:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《幽暗意識與民主傳統》闡論
書刊名:華神期刊
作者:朱曉海 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Sherman
出版日期:2009
卷期:2
頁次:頁40-69
主題關鍵詞:基督教教義
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:83
The present essay is divided into six sections. The first section recapitulates the main points of Professor Chang Hao's celebrated work ”Consciousness of Darkness and Democratic Tradition.” In section 2, I add a supplement and offer a correction to Chang's arguments from four aspects, particularly those about orthodox Christianity's perspective on the consciousness of darkness in human nature, suggesting that Chang's understanding is far from what is shown in traditional Chinese thoughts and orthodox Christianity. In section 3, I firstly discuss three issues in regard to human nature and democracy: the idea that human nature is evil can lead to anti-democracy; the belief that human nature is evil is not what democratic system is based on; and, non-Christian thoughts had helped to shape democracy, though unintentionally. In light of these philosophical reasoning and historical reality, I clarify the relationship between the consciousness of darkness and democratic systems. In section 4, I demonstrate that there has never been the concept of democracy in traditional Chinese thoughts and Christianity. Instead, both of them have understood the dynastic transition from the perspectives of Heaven's Mandate. However, their understandings of Heaven's Mandate are obviously different from each other in the fundamental sense. Section 5 starts by explaining why we adopt democracy, pointing out that democracy is no more than an expediency for securing liberty for the time being. I further delve into Christianity's viewpoint on liberty, which has been widely saluted. The last section reflects on the democracy-related issues such as whether the Christian church should adopt democracy, the actual degree of the practice of democracy in the Christian church, and whether it should be practiced uncompromisingly.
期刊論文
1.秦家懿(19851200)。「聖」在中國思想史內的多重意義。清華學報,17(1/2),15-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.朱曉海(20020600)。孔子的一個早期形象。清華學報,32(1),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Popper, Karl R.(1950)。The Open Society and its Enemies。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Schaff, Philip(1974)。A Select Library of the Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church。Grand Rapids:Eerdmans。  new window
3.Hinsley, Francis Harry(1986)。Sovereignty。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Rousseau, Jean Jacques(1947)。The Social Contract。New York:Hafner Press。  new window
5.Locke, John、Macpherson, C. B.(1980)。Second Treatise of Government。Indianapolis, IN:Hackett Publishing Company:Cambridge Press。  new window
6.楊惊、王先謙(1965)。荀子集解。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.朱熹(1975)。書.答陳同甫。朱文公文集。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.韋昭(1974)。楚語下。國語。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.瀧川龜太郎(1983)。項羽本紀。史記會注考證。臺北:洪氏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.瀧川龜太郎(1983)。高祖本紀。史記會注考證。臺北:洪氏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱熹(1985)。滕文公下。四書集注.孟子集注。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃暉(1990)。本性。論衡校釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱曉海(1999)。《荀子.性惡》真僞辨。張以仁先生七秩壽慶論文集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.王先謙(1965)。性惡。荀子集解。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱曉海(2005)。荀子性惡論論證的商兌及疑義探索。自由主義與人文傳統--林毓生先生祝壽論文集。臺北:允晨文化實業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.王先謙(1965)。正論。荀子集解。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.孔穎達(1977)。(僞)五子之歌。尙書注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.高亨、董治安(1998)。齊部第十三(上).畏字聲系。古字通假會典。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Berlin, Isaiah(1981)。The Originality of Machiavelli。Against the Current。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE