資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.226.150.219)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Perceived Competency Disparities between Pre-service Training and Job Demands of Primary School Administrators
書刊名:
教育科學研究期刊
作者:
洪榮昭
/
黃明月
/
許伶琦
/
李嘉崑
作者(外文):
Hong, Jon-chao
/
Hwang, Ming-yueh
/
Hsu, Lin-chi
/
Lee, Chia-kun
出版日期:
2009
卷期:
54:3
頁次:
頁29-51
主題關鍵詞:
行政能力
;
能力落差
;
國小行政管理
;
Administrators' competency
;
Competency disparity
;
Primary school administration
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:22
摘要: 本研究旨在探討行政人員之教育訓練是否能培訓其校園行政管理的知識與技能,以應付當前學校行政的工作需求。在研究中,共有1,872位國小行政人員接受問卷調查,該問卷共計有44題,分為六大類,藉此來瞭解行政主管對能力落差的看法。此樣本包括來自全國的國小校長、主任及組長級行政人員,問卷回收率達43.59%,計有816 份進行分析處理。研究結果發現,這些行政人員對問卷中六類能力落差的感受多偏於中低程度,而這些學校創新管理的能力中,心智能力是最被注重,而專業能力是最少被提及
以文找文
Abstract: The aim of this study is to explore whether school administrators’ training has provided necessary knowledge and competency for school management, which allows school administrators to cope with current demands in their profession. This study also examines competency disparities based on a survey. The 44-item, 6-category survey was then distributed to a sample of 1,872 elementary school administrators. These subjects consisted of nationwide elementary school principals, managers and team leaders. A return rate of 43.59% was achieved and 816 valid samples were collected and analyzed. The results indicated a common trend in all 44 items. The findings suggested that: perceptions of competency disparity in the six categories drawn from primary school administrators ranged from the low to the intermediate level. Among the six categories of elementary school administrators’ competencies in school innovative management, “mental capability” was most significantly perceived and “professional capability” was least mentioned.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Korthagen, A. J.(2004)。In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education。Teaching and Teacher Education,20(1),77-97。
2.
Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika,39(1),31-36。
3.
Day, Christopher、Elliot, Bob、Kington, Alison(2005)。Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment。Teaching and Teacher Education,21(5),563-577。
4.
Belkardi, F.、Bonjour, E.、Dulmet, M.。Competency Characterization by Means of Work Situation Modeling。Computers in Industry,58(2),164-178。
5.
Berio, G.、Harzallah, M.。Knowledge Management for Competency Management。Journal of Universal Knowledge Management,0(1),21-28。
6.
Falender, C. A.、Shafranske, E. P.。Competency in Competency-based Supervision Practice: Construct and Application。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,38(3),232-240。
7.
Harzallah, M.、Vernadat, F.。IT-based Competency Modeling and Management: From Theory to Practice in Enterprise Engineering and Operations。Computers in Industry,48(2),157-179。
8.
Hemphill, J.。Job Descriptions for Executives。Harvard Business Review,37(5),55-67。
9.
Hollenbeck, G. P.、McCall, M. W.、Silzer, R. F.。Leadership Competency Models。The Leadership Quarterly,17(4),398-413。
10.
Hong, J. C.、Horng, J. S.、ChanLin, L. J.、Lin, C. L.。Competency Disparity between Pre-service Teacher Education and in-service Teaching Requirements in Taiwan。International Journal of Education Development,28,4-20。
11.
Hydén, L. C.、Bülow, P. H.(2003)。Who's Talking? Drawing Conclusions from Focus Groups: Some Methodological Considerations。International Journal of Social Research Methodology,6(4),305-321。
12.
Kaslow, N. J.。Competency in Professional Psychology。American Psychologist,59,774-781。
13.
Koster, B.、Brekelmans, M.、Korthagen, F.、Wubbels, T.。Quality Requirements for Teacher Educators。Teaching and Teacher Education,21(2),157-176。
14.
Lehex, P.、Poland, B.、Daudelin, G.。Focus Group Research and "The Patient's View"。Social Science & Medicine,63(8),2091-2104。
15.
Murray, J.、Male, T.(2005)。Becoming a Teacher Educator: Evidence from the Field。Teaching and Teacher Education,21(2),125-142。
16.
Obradović, J.、van Dulmen, M. H. M.、Yates, T. M.、Carlson, E. A.、Egeland, B.。Developmental Assessment of Competency from Early Childhood to Middle Adolescence。Journal of Adolescence,29(6),857-889。
17.
Propp, D. A.、Glickman, S.、Uehara, D. T.。ED Leadership Competency Matrix: An Administrative Management Tool。The American Journal of Emergency Medicine,21(6),483-486。
18.
Schellens, Tammy、Valcke, Martin(2005)。Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Discussion Groups: What about the Impact on Cognitive Processing?。Computers in Human Behavior,21(6),957-975。
19.
Spencer, W. A.、Kochan, F. K.。Gender Related Differences in Career Patterns of Principals in Alabama: A Statewide Study。Education Policy Analysis Archives,8(9),1-15。
20.
Tobias, L.、Dietrich, A.。Identifying Employee Competencies in Dynamic Work Domains: Methodological Considerations and a Case Study。Journal of Universal Computer Science,9(12),1500-1518。
21.
Vidal-Gomel, C.、Samurçay, R.。Qualitative Analyses of Accidents and Incidents to Identify Competencies: The Electrical Systems Maintenance Case。Safety Science,40(6),479-500。
22.
Wever, B. D.、Keer, H. V.、Schellens, T.、Valcke, M.。Applying Multilevel Modelling to Content Analysis Data: Methodological Issues in the Study of Role Assignment in Asynchronous Discussion Groups。Learning and Instruction,17(4),436-447。
圖書
1.
Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。
2.
McClelland, David(1975)。Power: The Inner Experience。New York:Irvington Publishers。
3.
Hamel, G.、Prahalad, C. K.(1996)。Competing for the Future。Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press。
4.
Neuendorf, K. A.(2002)。The Content Analysis Guidebook。Sage。
5.
Burns, N.、Grove, S. K.。The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization。The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique, & Utilization。Philadelphia, PA。
6.
Dunnette, M.。The Assessment of Managerial Talent。Advances in Psychological Assessment。Palo Alto, CA。
7.
Kline, P.。An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis。An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis。London, UK。
8.
Kremer-Hayon, L.、Zuzovsky, R.。Themes, Processes and Trends in the Professional Development of Teacher Educators。Teachers Who Teach Teachers。London, UK。
9.
Litwin, M.。How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity。How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity。Thousand Oaks, CA。
10.
McCall, M. W.、Hollenbeck, G. P.。Developing Global Executives: The Lessons of International Experience。Developing Global Executives: The Lessons of International Experience。Boston, MA。
11.
Murphy, K. R.、Davidshofer, C. O.。Psychological Testing。Psychological Testing。Englewood, NJ。
12.
Murray, J.。New Educators' Needs Perspectives from Research and Practice。New Educators' Needs Perspectives from Research and Practice。London, UK。
13.
Thornton, G.、Byham, W.。Assessment Centers and Managerial Performance。Assessment Centers and Managerial Performance。Orlando, FL。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
「國際華語教師學科教學知識問卷」之編製與教師教學能力素養落差分析
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code