臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Development of a Competency-Based Group Health Teaching Performance Examination Model for BSN Graduates
書刊名：The Journal of Nursing Research
作者：戴君倚／鍾聿琳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tai, Chun-yi／Chung, Ue-lin
出版日期：2008
卷期：16:4
頁次：頁275-285
主題關鍵詞：Competency examination；Group health teaching；Quasi-clinical situation model；Clinical performance examination clinical examination；能力鑑定；團體健康教學；半模擬臨床情境模式；臨床展現考試臨床考試
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:22
目前台灣的護理教育在「教考用」的原則下，仍無一套公正、客觀的畢業生團體健康教學能力鑑定之工具，故本研究的目的在研發一套具信效度的大學層級護理系畢業生團體健康教學能力鑑定模式，以作為護理畢業生的團體健康教學能力評鑑之依據。本研究採行動研究法，分兩個階段進行，第一為研發之階段，在研究之初即成立鑑定模式研發團隊，此團隊定期開會討論，依據文獻及台灣護理實務，發展出以半模擬臨床情境模式的鑑定模式之內涵及過程，並完成考試場所的準備、模擬病人的招募、劇本的設計、鑑核老師和模擬病人的培訓以及評量與學習指引手冊。此草案在經專家的檢定及小型的預測，兩度修正後定案。第二為測試之階段，即實際應用此已研發完成的鑑定模式，來進行此模式效信度之初探。具有各2年以上臨床實務和教學經驗之大學層級護理人員3位、未修過教學原理且未有實務經驗的護生3位、鑑核老師3位和模擬病人6位，共同參與此鑑定模式效信度之驗證。本模式測試之結果具專家及區分效度，鑑核老師執行模式和模擬病人於每一場考試中的演出亦具高度之一致性，此模式不但可應用為能力鑑定考試，做為學生抵免學分之依據，亦可以應用於傳統護理學程及護理實務，做為鑑定護理人員團體健康教學能力的另一種選擇。
Under the current nursing education system in Taiwan, a fair and objective evaluation of group health teaching competency has been lacking for a long time. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish a competency-based group health teaching performance examination model for baccalaureate graduates. Action research was the main research methodology used in this study. The research consisted of two phases. In the first phase, a development committee was established. Based on routine discussions, literature reviews and realistic cases, a draft examination model with quasi-clinical situation model content and procedure was developed. Examination Facility Preparations, Simulated Scenarios and Client Recruitments, Examination Result Evaluation (evaluated by teachers) and Learning Guidelines were also prepared. This draft was reviewed twice for expert opinion, a pilot test was done and both the draft and pilot testing were reviewed again before the draft was finalized. The second phase involved refining the examination model by actually practicing the completed draft examination model in a simulated group-teaching setting in order to examine the model's reliability and validity. Fifteen people were involved in this experiment: three nursing personnel each having at least two years' clinical and teaching experience; three nursing students who did not have actual clinical experience and had not taken the course of teaching principles; three senior teachers; and six virtual patients. The responses from the nursing personnel, nursing students, teachers, and virtual patients who participated in the testing were gathered and integrated to refine the model. The model has content, expert and discriminative validity. The reliability of the model was proven by the high consistency in administration and scoring of the model by clinical examiners. This examination model is not only applicable for the proof of students' credit point exemption, but also as an alternative option for examining nursing personnel in traditional nursing education and practice.
期刊論文
1.Johnson, J. H.、Zerwic, J. J.、Theis, S. L.(1999)。Clinical Simulation Laboratory: An Adjunct to Clinical Teaching。Nurse Educator，24(5)，37-41。  new window
2.Lenburg, C. B.、Mitchell, C. A.(1991)。Assessment of Outcomes: The Design and Use of Real and Simulation Nursing Performance Examinations。Nursing & Health Care，12(2)，68-74。  new window
3.Long, M. C.、Redding, B. A.(1991)。Evaluating Clinical Skills of RN Students。Nurse Educator，16(3)，31-33。  new window
4.李怡娟(19971000)。行動研究在護理上的應用。護理研究，5(5)，463-468。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.曾珍麗、尹裕君、陳都美(19970300)。護理人員能力進階制度實施成效之探討。榮總護理，14(1)，52-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾聿琳(2000)。臨床能力展現考試。護理雜誌，47(3)，13-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Higgins, B.、Ochsner, S.(1989)。Two approaches to clinical evaluation。Nurse Educator，14(2)，8-11。  new window
8.高千惠、吳祥鳳、高美玲、鍾聿琳、郭素珍、曾秀瑜、林明慧、盧玉贏(2001)。大學護理畢業生產科臨床專業能力鑑定模式的發展。護理研究，9(3)，213-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Rosebraugh, C. J.、Speer, A. J.、Solomon, D. J.、Szauter, K. E.、Ainsworth, M. A.、Holden, M.(1997)。Setting Standards and Defining Quality of Performance in the Validation of a Standardized-patient Examination Format。Academic Medicine，72(11)，1012-1014。  new window
10.Gould, D.、Kelly, D.、Goldstone, L.、Gammon, J.(2001)。Examining the Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales: Developing and Using Illustrated Patient Simulations to Collect the Data。Journal of Clinical Nursing，10(5)，697-705。  new window
11.Chang, K. K.、Chung, J. W.、Wong, T. K.(2002)。Learning Intravenous Cannulation: A Comparison of the Conventional Method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System。Journal of Clinical Nursing，11(1)，73-78。  new window
12.Massias, L. A.、Shimer, C. A.(2007)。Clinical Simulations: Let's Get Real!。Teaching and Learning in Nursing，2(4)，105-108。  new window
13.Luttrell, M. F.、Lenburg, C. B.、Scherubel, J. C.、Jacob, S. R.、Koch, R. W.(1999)。Competency Outcomes for Learning and Performance Assessment: Redesigning a BSN Curriculum。Nursing and Health Care Perspectives，20(3)，134-141。  new window
14.Bennett, L.、Baikie, K.(2003)。The Client as Educator: Learning about Mental Illness through the Eyes of the Expert。Nurse Education Today，23(2)，104-111。  new window
15.Alinier, G.(2003)。Nursing Students' and Lecturers' Perspectives of Objective Structured Clinical Examination Incorporating Simulation。Nurse Education Today，23(6)，419-426。  new window
16.Ferrell, B. G.、Thompson, B. L.(1993)。A Clinical Performance Assessment for a Third-year Required Clerkship in Family Medicine。Family Medicine，25(4)，262-263。  new window
17.Rogers, P. L.、Jacob, H.、Thomas, E. A.、Harwell, M.、Willenkin, R. L.、Pinsky, M. R.(2000)。Medical Students Can Learn the Basic Application, Analytic, Evaluative, and Psychomotor Skills of Critical Care Medicine。Critical Care Medicine，28(2)，550-554。  new window
18.Pollard, M. L.(2007)。Faculty Matters。Nursing Education Perspectives，28(4)，178-179。  new window
19.Bryans, A.、McIntosh, J.(2000)。The Use of Simulation and Post-simulation Interview to Examine the Knowledge Involved in Community Nursing Assessment Practice。Journal of Advanced Nursing，31(5)，1244-1251。  new window
20.Rogers, J.、Dains, J.、Corboy, J.、Chang, T.(1999)。Curriculum Renewal and a Process of Care Curriculum for Teaching Clerkship Students。Family Medicine，31(6)，391-397。  new window
21.De Lucio, L. G.、López, F. J. G.、López, M. T. M.、Hesse, B. M.、Vaz, M. D. C.(2000)。Training Programme in Techniques of Self-control and Communication Skills to Improve Nurses' Relationships with Relatives of Seriously Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study。Journal of Advanced Nursing，32(2)，425-431。  new window
22.Kruijver, I. P. M.、Kerkstra, A.、Bensing, J. M.、Van De Wiel, H. B. M.(2001)。Communication Skills of Nurses during Interactions with Simulated Cancer Patients。Journal of Advanced Nursing，34(6)，772-779。  new window
23.O'Connor, F. W.、Albert, M. L.、Thomas, M. D.(1999)。Incorporating Standardized Patients into a Psychosocial Nurse Practitioner Program。Archives of Psychiatric Nursing，8(5)，240-247。  new window
研究報告
1.鍾聿琳(1993)。臺灣護理業界對護理技職教育各層級畢業生專業能力意見之調查。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lenburg, C. B.(1979)。The Clinical Performance Examination。The Clinical Performance Examination。New York, NY：Appleton-Century Crofts。  new window
2.Munhall, P. L.、Boyd, C. D.(1993)。Nursing Research, a Qualitative Perspective。Nursing Research, a Qualitative Perspective。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1404（臺灣：1399，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67772718
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上