:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「常態編班」政策實施的探討:以國中英語科為例
書刊名:中等教育
作者:張玉芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Yuh-fang
出版日期:2009
卷期:60:3
頁次:頁110-127
主題關鍵詞:學生英語能力懸殊能力分班國中英語教學Ability trackingEnglish teachingJunior high school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:58
期刊論文
1.Gamoran, Adam、Nystrand, Martin、Berends, Mark、LePore, Paul C.(1995)。An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping。American Educational Research Journal,32(4),687-715。  new window
2.Cheung, C. K.、Rudowicz, E.(2003)。Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong。The Journal of Educational Research,96(4),241-254。  new window
3.楊國樞(19760100)。能力分班對學業成績與心理健康的影響。科學發展月刊,4(1),5-27。  延伸查詢new window
4.Broaded, C. Montgomery(1997)。The limits and possibilities of tracking: Some evidence from Taiwan。Sociology of Education,70(1),36-53。  new window
5.張武昌(20030800)。我國的國中英語教育:問題與對策。人文及社會學科教學通訊,14(2)=80,113-130。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊荊生(19821200)。國中能力分班對學習效果之影響。輔導月刊,19(1),64-70。  延伸查詢new window
7.梁尚勇(19701100)。臺北市國民中學實施能力分班之調查研究。思與言,8(4),1-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Slavin, R. E.(1987)。Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis。Review of Educational Research,57(3),293-336。  new window
9.梁昆霞(19790600)。能力分班方式對國中學生自我概念之影響--學科能力分班與固定式能力分班之比較研究。教育與心理研究,3,233-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.高強華(2004)。編班與分組方式的檢討與展望。中等教育,55(5),187-195。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊荊生(1982)。國中學生能力分班的檢討:分班的型態與教學效果。臺灣教育,383,17-22。  延伸查詢new window
12.Chen, Y. H.、Shih, C. Y.(2007)。Evaluation of ability grouping and mixed-ability grouping practices in Junior high English class。Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly,15(2),35-78。  new window
13.林俊傑(2004)。標籤化的教育制度--能力分班vs.常態分班。師友,444,27-30。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐享良(1978)。臺中市立居仁國民中學實施能力分班對教師態度及學生態度影響之研究。教育學院學報,3,261-283。  延伸查詢new window
15.張長芳(1972)。國民中學能力分班問題之研究。國立政治大學學報,26,315-352。  延伸查詢new window
16.Chien, C. N.、Ching, H. L.、Kao, L. H.(2002)。Study on a different leveling English instruction policy for 'Freshman English' in Chung Yuan Christian University。Chung Yuan Journal,30,505-516。  new window
17.Kulik, C. C.、Kulik, J. A.(1982)。Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings。American Educational Research Journal,19(3),415-428。  new window
18.Lou, Y.、Chambers, B.(2000)。Why Should We Group Students Within-Class for Learning?。Educational Research and Evaluation,6(2),158-179。  new window
19.Resh, N.(1998)。Track Placement: How the 'Sorting Machine' Works in Israel。American Journal of Education,106(3),416-438。  new window
20.Slavin, R.(1993)。Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievemen effects and alternatives。Review of Education Research,60(4),471-499。  new window
會議論文
1.施玉惠(2002)。台灣九年一貫英語課程之特色以及實施後之省思。海峽兩岸新世紀小學課程與教材改革學術研討會。台北:國立台北師範學院。193-222。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張煌熙。國中編班方式與學生學習動機之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1971)。九年國民教育實施情形調查報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(1971)。九年國民教育檢討會議意見彙編。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Oakes, J.(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Birmingham, NY:New Haven:Vail-Ballou Press:Yale University Press。  new window
4.Bryan, M. M.、Findley, W. G.(1970)。Ability grouping: 1970-UU. The impact of ability grouping on school achievement, affective development, ethnic separation and socioeconomic separation。ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 048382。  new window
5.Byrne, B.(1988)。Adolescent Self-Concept, Ability Grouping, and Social Comparison: Reexamining Academic Track Differences。ERIC Reproduction Document Service No. ED 302565。  new window
6.French, D.、Rothman, S.(1990)。Structuring schools for student success: A focus on ability grouping。ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 501。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top