:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國專利訴訟制度:以專利有效性問題為中心
書刊名:智慧財產權月刊
作者:陳秉訓 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ping-hsun
出版日期:2009
卷期:131
頁次:頁67-101
主題關鍵詞:專利法美國專利訴訟專利有效性
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
期刊論文
1.Sung, Lawrence M.(1999)。Echoes of Scientific Truth in the Halls of Justice: The Standards of Review Applied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Patent-Related Matters。Am. U. L. Rev.,48,1233-1237。  new window
2.Schwartz, David L.(2009)。Courting Specialization: An Empirical Study Of Claim Construction Comparing Patent Litigation Before Federal District Courts And The International Trade Commission。Wm. & Mary L. Rev.,50,1699-1711。  new window
3.Broughan, Thomas A. III(2009)。Modernizing § 337's Domestic Industry Requirement for the Global Economy。Federal Circuit Bar Journal,19,41-78。  new window
4.Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper(2008)。In Search of Institutional Identity: The Federal Circuit Comes of Age。BERKELEY TECH. L.J.,23,787-789。  new window
5.Field, Ted L.(2009)。Improving the Federal Circuit's Approach to Choice of Law for Procedural Matters in Patent Cases。GEO. MASON L. REV.,16,643-644。  new window
6.Quillen, Cecil D. Jr.(2008)。Commentary on Bessen and Meurer's Patent Failure: An Industry Perspective。J. INTELL. PROP. L.,16,57-64。  new window
7.Sutton, John P.(2007)。Should the Federal Circuit Defer to Findings of Fact by Tribunals below It?。J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y,89,701-702。  new window
8.Shartzer, Adam(2009)。Patent Litigation 101: Empirical Support for the Patent Pilot Program's Solution to Increase Judicial Experience in Patent Law。FED. CIRCUIT B.J.,18,191-195。  new window
9.Hale, Emmette F. III(1986)。The 'Arising Under' Jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit: An Opportunity for Uniformity in Patent Law。Fla. St. U. L. Rev.,14,229-236。  new window
10.Petro, Anthony M.(2009)。Threading the Needle: Intermediate-Scope Broadening Reissue Claims and the Recapture Rule。TEX. L. REV.,87,827。  new window
11.Gardella, Greg H.、Berger, Emily A.(2009)。United States Reexamination Procedures: Recent Trends, Strategies and Impact on Patent Practice。J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L.,8,381-386。  new window
12.Oliver, Jason S.(2003)。Reexamining the Meaning of a "Substantial New Question of Patentability": Amending the Patent Reexamination Provision's Threshold Requirement。Syracuse Law Review,53,1093-1095。  new window
13.Charneski, Carl C.(2009)。The Role of the Office of the Administrative Law Judges within the United States International Trade Commission。J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L.,8,216-218。  new window
14.de Blank, Bas、Cheng, Bing(2009)。Where is the ITC Going after Kyocera?。SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J.,25,701-703。  new window
15.Dennis, Corey M.(2007)。Case Comment, Sufficiency of Evidence Not Reviewable in Absence of Post-Verdict Judgment as a Matter of Law or New Trial Motion - Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394 (2006)。Suffolk U. L. Rev.,41,279-281。  new window
16.Stewart, Mark J.(1999)。The Written Description Requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112(1): The Standard after Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co.。IND. L. REV.,32,537-542。  new window
17.Kumar, Sapna(2009)。The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC。FLA. L. REV.,61,529-550。  new window
圖書
1.HAZARD, GEOFFREY C. JR.(2005)。PLEADING AND PROCEDURE: STATE AND FEDERAL。Foundation Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE