:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國特定農產品(香菇)取消關稅配額後產業損害預期效果之研析
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:黃智輝廖芳心
作者(外文):Huang, Chi-hueiLiao, Fan-shin
出版日期:2009
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁25-39
主題關鍵詞:特別防衛措施關稅配額商業政策分析模型Special safeguard clauseCOMPAS modelTariff rate quota
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:40
台灣屬小農體制的國家,長期以來農業部門都是受政府保護性政策如高關稅、關稅配額員及補貼政策等所維護。在加入WTO後,我國必須履行WTO協商之承諾,調降各類產品之進口關稅,取消各類進口管制、削減境內補貼等貿易保護措施,而農產品更是協商削減之主要對象。國內農產品在未來勢必面對低價進口品的衝擊影響,如何在短時間內快速評估產黨損失,值得相關政府單位多加重視。本研究運用美國國際貿易委員會所發展的商業政策分析系統(簡稱COMPAS模型)進行農產品產業損害認定之分析,探討特定農產品(香菇為例)若取消適用關稅配額政策時,對該產業所帶來的衝擊影響。結果發現一旦政府相關係護措施的取消,香菇之價格、產出帶來大幅度的負面影響,本研究結果可提供我國目前正在實施之23項關稅配額,其中更有15項可以實施特別防衛措施之產品推估其成本與收益及產業損害衡量之參考指標,作為政府部門事先預為輔導開放及彌補損害之效益評估模型。
Taiwan is a nation of small-scale economy agricultural sector has been protected by government for a long time by high tariff, tariff quotas and subsidy policy domestically. The agricultural sector is the most important sector of many economics and highly protective acts were practiced in this sector. Therefore the World Trade Organization (WTO) in particular allows imported countries to proceed with temporary protective activities-"Special Safeguard clause". However, Taiwan needs to follow the results of WTO negotiation after participating WTO. For executing the promise of WTO negotiation results, we have to decrease import tariff among relevant products and cancel policies of trade protection such as import control and domestic subsidy. Particularly in agricultural products, it is the major goal to reduce tariff between WTO members. We will face the challenge of low-price products from outside countries, making policy fast for dealing with relevant problems and computing out industrial loss in a short time are both worthy for government to pay more attention on it. We try to applied COMPAS model for analysis. In our research, we choose the shiitake as our research targets. We found that producers will have the negative impacts after reducing tariff. Shiitake have more serious effects of price than of amount. This could be resulted from quantity control policy by government, consumer behavior in domestic and quality reorganization from domestic products to foreign products. Government should assist farmers to build up knowledge of branding and processing before foreign low-price products begin to shock domestic market. Excluding strict definition of Safeguard clause, based on different tariff set up, the protection effect of "Safeguard Clause" could be great than of "Special Safeguard Clause" to impose positive effect on domestic firms.
期刊論文
1.黃智輝、廖芳心(20070300)。世界貿易組織衝擊與我國農產品救濟措施之研究。臺灣銀行季刊,58(1),204-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bureau, J. C.、Tangerman, S.(2000)。Tariff Rates Quotas in the EU。Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,29(1),70-80。  new window
3.黃智輝(20080600)。我國入會後農產品貿易救濟產業損害之模擬分析--以紅豆產業為例。農業經濟叢刊,13(2),135-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Boughner, D. S.、de Gorter, H.、Shledon, I. M.(2000)。The Economics of Two-Tier Tariff-Rate Import Quotas in Agriculture。Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,29(1),58-69。  new window
5.Abbott, P.、Morse, B. A.(2000)。Tariff Rate Quota Implementation and Administration by Developing Countries。Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,29(1),115-124。  new window
6.Shiells, C. R.、Stern, R. M.、Deardorff, A. V.(1986)。Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution between Imports and Home Goods for the United States。Weltwirtschaftliches Archive,122(3),497-519。  new window
7.邱照仁(19970500)。Compas Methodology在產業損害認定上之運用。貿易調查專刊,2,195-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Armington, Paul S.(1969)。The Geographic Pattern of Trade and the Effects of Price changes。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),176-199。  new window
9.Said, S. E.、Dickey, D. A.(1985)。Hypothesis Testing in ARIMA (p, 1, q) Models。Journal of the American Statistical Association,80,369-374。  new window
10.黃智輝(20000100)。反傾銷稅的經濟福利效益分析。臺灣經濟金融月刊,36(1)=420,66-83。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃智輝(20031200)。反傾銷案件產業損害調查經濟效益實證分析--我國案例探討。臺灣銀行季刊,54(4),216-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.USITC(1995)。The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order and Suspension Agreements。USITC Investigation,5-9,332-334。  new window
13.黃智輝(20060600)。臺灣農產品救助政策與進品救濟制度運用之效益分析。農業經濟叢刊,11(2),309-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳再益、賴英崑(1996)。美國實施反傾銷稅暨平衡稅經濟效益分析之研究。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽(2002)。反傾銷制度與產業保護效果--台灣個案研究。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳逸潔(2007)。WTO農業關稅配額管理議題與重要國家實際執行方式之研析。  延伸查詢new window
4.王鳳生(1999)。進口救濟制度對產業結構調整之研究--多部門一般均衡模型。  延伸查詢new window
5.左峻德(1998)。課徵反傾銷稅對產業影響之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳添枝(2005)。WTO新回合談判對我國經濟之影響評估--計量模型分析 (計畫編號:9412-6-0781A1)。臺北市:中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO中心)。  延伸查詢new window
7.李順成(2000)。加入WTO後國內重要農產品關稅配額制度及其管理之研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李淑媛(2006)。反傾銷案件產業損害認定經濟分析模型之研究-台灣型鋼產業之應用(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Francois, J. F.、Hall, H. K.(1993)。COMPAS: Commercial Policy Analysis System。Washington, D. C.:U. S. International Trade Commission。  new window
2.World Trade Organization(1995)。The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations。  new window
3.Francois, J. F.、Reinert, K. A.(1997)。Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.沈筱玲(1999)。反傾銷措施裁定效應之分析--以本土個案為例。台北:天一圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top