Tongcheng School member, Ma Qichang finished Study on Mao's Poetry in 1916. It was a synthesis of studies on Mao's poetry posterior to the works by Chen Qiyuan, Hu Chenggong, Ma Ruichen, and Chen Huan. However, due to the decline of ancient text school during the late Chin dynasty, the prosperity of modern text school, New Culture Movement's advocate of the abolishment of "preface" during the early Republic of China, and the impact of the abolishment of classics on academic thinking, people viewed this book as a conservative work, which therefore had lacked organization and relevant researches. This paper discusses this book from all aspects, including the life and works of Ma Qichang, different versions of Study on Mao's Poetry, the concept and the style of creation, the creation feature of Study on Mao's Poetry, Study on Mao's Poetry's point of view and glosses of Preface to Poetry, Study on Mao's Poetry's glosses of Preface to Poetry, and the extension and contribution of Study on Mao's Poetry towards researches on Mao's Poetry. The conclusions are as follows. Based on the Method of Collating Mao's Commentaries on the Book of Songs by Chen Huan, Study on Mao's Poetry had a positive opinion on Preface to Poetry and detailed explanation presented in Mao's Commentary of poetries. Moreover, Study on Mao's Poetry widely took the opinions of the annotators in the pass to gain a full understanding of the profound knowledge presented in Preface to Poetry and "Mao's Commentary". Study on Mao's Poetry accepted the opinions expressed in Zheng's book and Three Schools of Poetry which showed that the author did not have biased opinions on certain schools as Chen Huan did. Study on Mao's Poetry could not compete with Method of Collating Mao's Commentaries on the Book of Songs in terms of the researches into the following aspects: semantics of ancient words, systems of things, history and geography. Nonetheless, Study on Mao's Poetry was the only work which was able to provide thorough explanations about all the large number of details mentioned, put more emphasis on the explanations and sublime words with deep meaning of the meaning of poetries to make up the deficiency of Chen Huan and complete the researches of Mao's Poetry. Chen Han Zhang had the following praises about this book: "Because of this book, ancient text school will never be abolished!" Though not as a pioneer research work about Mao's Poetry, Study on Mao's Poetry is still an important material for today's researches into Mao's Poetry!