:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「崑劇傳統」在當代的意義:以《牡丹亭》「重構本」為例的探討
書刊名:戲劇學刊
作者:陳芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Fang
出版日期:2010
卷期:11
頁次:頁163-193
主題關鍵詞:崑劇當代戲曲牡丹亭折子全本戲Kungu operaContemporary musical theatreThe peony pavilionExtractsThe complete set of a play
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:240
「傳統與創新」是當代戲曲的重要課題,但是,對於「傳統」的界義與內涵,卻似乎缺乏具體的論述。就崑劇而言,在悠久的歷史發展中,已然從全本戲逐漸提煉出折子戲,形成崑劇表演的「乾、嘉傳統」。當代「重構全本」演出時,究竟要如何對待這些乾、嘉折子,其實就涉及對待「傳統」的態度與方法,也直接影響了劇作的展演風貌。筆者以為,乾、嘉時期所形成的定式折子,雖是「崑劇傳統」的基礎,卻非絕對不可更動,亦非全部都是「經典」折子。在重構全本時,對於這些折子的內容與表演,或微調精修,或挪移刪節,或重新捏塑,其編創基準應建立在對折子核心精義的認識上。本文即以《牡丹亭》為例,嘗試從宏觀與微觀的角度來盱衡全局,思考如何在當代重構一部兼具思想內蘊與藝術價值的全本戲。
Tradition and Innovation are significant issues in contemporary musical theatres. “Innovation rooted in tradition” was a well-known slogan in the last decade. However, there are few discourses on the definition and connotation of so-called “tradition”. Che Tzu (extracts refined out of the complete set of a play), for example, had become formalized and evolved into the “Chien-Jia Tradition” of the Kungu Opera for centuries. On the other hand, theaters nowadays have reconstructed the traditional Chinese opera in a creative and innovative way. In terms of Kungu Opera, there were more than a dozen of formalized extracts and reconstructed editions to perform The Peony Pavilion. Therefore, the adapters and performers’manners and attitudes toward tradition had direct impact on the styles and features of their presentations. In my opinion, there exist fine adjustments and modifications to reconstruct a contemporary meaning of Kungu Opera. Take The Peony Pavilion for example, many popular extracts such as Quest for the Garden Saunter and the Interrupted Dream, Finding the Portrait and Calling to the Portrait are too classic to make significant modifications. The tedious and superfluous parts in some unimportant extracts, such as The Schoolroom, Infernal judgment, Encouraging Agriculture, and Asking for Directions may be deleted. Some of the missing extracts such as Painting a Portrait and The Soul Departs can be regenerated based on the traditional performance style. As long as the purport of intense sentiment and true love is well managed, and the conflict of sense and sensibility is plotted, we would expect a reconstructed edition of The Peony Pavilion that embraces meaningful connotations and artistic values.
期刊論文
1.陳芳(20070600)。試論崑劇表演的「乾、嘉傳統」。戲曲學報,1,181-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.華瑋(2003)。則為你如花美眷,似水流年─《牡丹亭‧驚夢》的詮釋及演出。臺灣戲專學刊,7,91-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.沈冰血(1923)。戲目偶志。戲雜誌,6。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kowaills, Jon Eugene von(2006)。“大流亡”中一“亭”─崑劇《牡丹亭》在海外上演的文化框架。南京師範大學文學院學報,4,52-58。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳芳(2008)。傳神不傳形─以《寫真》、《拾叫》為例論崑劇表演的傳承。九州學林,6(1),2-29。  延伸查詢new window
6.廖奔(2000)。觀念挪移與文化闡釋錯位─美國塞氏《牡丹亭》印象。文藝爭鳴,2001(1),55-60。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉俊(2007)。論青春版崑曲《牡丹亭》的當代意義。面對世界:崑曲與《牡丹亭》國際學術研討會,國家大劇院(主辦) (會議日期: 2007/10/08-10/11)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳凱莘(1999)。崑劇《牡丹亭》舞台藝術演進之探討--以《牡丹亭》晚明文人改編本及折子戲為探討對象(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.桑毓喜(2000)。崑劇傳字輩。南京。  延伸查詢new window
2.周世瑞、周攸(2003)。周傳瑛身段譜。臺北:國家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.岳美緹、楊汗如(2006)。臨風度曲。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.王季烈、劉富樑(1969)。集成曲譜。臺北:進學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈德符(1982)。顧曲雜言。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.周傳瑛、洛地(1988)。崑劇生涯六十年。上海:上海文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.冲和居士(1984)。怡春錦。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭培凱(1995)。湯顯祖與達觀和尚─兼論湯顯祖人生態度與超越精神的發展。湯顯祖與晚明文化。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭培凱(1995)。湯顯祖的文藝觀與《牡丹亭》曲文的藝術成就。湯顯祖與晚明文化。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.王安祈(2005)。如何檢測崑劇全本復原的意義。湯顯祖與牡丹亭。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.古兆申(2003)。古蒼梧集。古蒼梧集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.李惠綿(2005)。《審音鑑古錄:牡丹亭》折子戲的改編與表演。奼紫嫣紅牡丹亭:四百年青春之夢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.周秦(2005)。《牡丹亭》曲譜選錄。奼紫嫣紅牡丹亭:四百年青春之夢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.俞振飛(1991)。振飛曲譜。振飛曲譜。上海。  延伸查詢new window
15.張淑香(2005)。捕捉愛情神話的春影─青春版《牡丹亭》的詮釋與整編。奼紫嫣紅牡丹亭:四百年青春之夢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳芳(2007)。晚清宮廷崑劇的演出與嬗變。花部與雅部。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.陸萼庭(2005)。〈遊園驚夢〉集說。湯顯祖與牡丹亭。臺北:中研院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
18.(2005)。《牡丹亭》劇本。奼紫嫣紅牡丹亭:四百年青春之夢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.葉長海、蔡正仁(2005)。無悔追夢─上崑名家從藝五十周年風采實錄。無悔追夢─上崑名家從藝五十周年風采實錄。上海。  延伸查詢new window
20.鄭培凱(2005)。梅蘭芳對《牡丹亭》的詮釋。湯顯祖與牡丹亭。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)玩花主人,(清)錢德蒼(1987)。綴白裘,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.俞振飛(1996)。粟廬曲譜。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)青溪菰蘆(1987)。醉怡情。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)王繼善(1987)。審音鑑古錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)毛晉(2002)。碩園刪定牡丹亭,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)湯顯祖。臨川四夢。  延伸查詢new window
7.(明)湯顯祖(1999)。牡丹亭,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.崑曲身段譜。  延伸查詢new window
9.季國平(2007)。經典也流行─兼談青春版《牡丹亭》的當代意義,北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)張廷玉(1956)。明史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.牡丹亭。  延伸查詢new window
12.(2000)。牡丹亭,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(2004)。牡丹亭,臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
14.(1997)。牡丹亭,北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.(1999)。牡丹亭,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.牡丹亭。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.馮夢龍、俞民(199307)。墨憨齋定本傳奇。夢龍全集。南京:江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳新雷(2004)。一九一一年以來《牡丹亭》演出回顧。姹紫嫣紅牡丹亭:四百年青春之夢。臺北:遠流出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.王文章(2000)。蘭苑集萃─五十年中國崑劇演出劇本選(1949-1999)。蘭苑集萃─五十年中國崑劇演出劇本選(1949-1999)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE