:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民帝國日本的異法域統合與差別
書刊名:臺灣史研究
作者:山室信一陳姃湲 引用關係鍾淑敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Yamamuro, Shinichi
出版日期:2009
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:國民帝國異法域統合統合差別格差共通法Nation-empireUnion of different legal zonesIntegrationDiscriminationCommon law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:165
明治日本建構國民國家的經驗,影響到其領有殖民地,也影響到明治國家轉變為殖民帝國過程中的改變。但是明治憲法中並沒有任何關於日本領地或擁有殖民地之規定。因此,明治憲法的起草人未曾預想領有殖民地的可能性,也沒有考慮擁有殖民地時的法律地位以及應該如何統治管理的問題。 獲得臺灣、朝鮮、樺太及關東州等地後,日本將其部分憲法延伸適用於這些殖民地時,對於母國以及殖民地之國民並未適用統一的法律。而且,不論採行何種法律政策,日本必須先考慮各地社會中的法制狀態,才能決定法律的適用與否。因此明治國家就不得不採行由異法域結合構成的帝國體系。在此帝國結構下,人們以及適用於他們身上的法律規範並不是任意的交錯摻雜,而是刻意建構出不同的權利與義務,其中本國居於最優越的地位。 帝國內的異法域之間有不同的法律系統與適用情況,而且有各自不同的裁判系統。為解決這種異法域之間所衍生的問題,日本在1918 年實施共通法,欲在以往施行不同民事與刑事法律及法規的異法域之間建立統一的適用規則,希望達到全國為同一法域的理想。 作者在本文將嘗試以國民帝國的概念來釐清整個日本帝國的特質,不過在此也要特別強調其具有兩個不同面向,因為它是將國民國家與殖民地帝國融合為一體之意。不過作者同時也指出,正因包含著國民國家與殖民地帝國兩個彼此矛盾的基礎,故無法避免國民帝國本身隱含著自我矛盾的潛在趨勢。 明治國家在法律結構上直到最後都無法擺脫做為異法域結合體的法律結構。對不同法域中被迫加入帝國臣民行列的人而言,他們所負擔的義務遠遠超過了所享受的有限權利。
The experience of Meiji Japan in establishing a nation state influenced its governance of the colonies acquired and also its transformation into a colonial empire. However, the Meiji Constitution did not contain any provisions concerning either Japanese dominion or possession of colonies. The drafters had never envisaged any possibility of Japan becoming a colonizer; and hence, left absolutely no groundwork concerning the legal status of colonies, or their governance. After acquiring Taiwan, Korea, Karafuto (Sakhalin) and Kantoushu, Japan applied its Constitution to these colonies but the people of Japan and its colonies were not governed by the same laws. Due consideration was first given to the conditions of the local legal system before any policy, laws and regulations were to be implemented in the colonies. Thus, the Meiji imperial empire was in reality a union of different legal zones. Neither the people within the empire nor the laws applied to them were unified. Not only the people seldom intermingled, differential rights and obligations were often consciously constructed, with the home country given the most privileged position. When complicated further the situation was that the colonies all had different legal and court systems. Such chaotic status naturally led to conflicts and disputes in the legal arena. To resolve the problem would require the institution of a unified legal system for the entire empire and the enactment of a common law for universal governance. In 1918, in an attempt to realize the ideal of a unified legal zone throughout the Japanese empire, a common law went into effect. In this paper, I will elucidate the characteristics of the whole Japanese empire using the concept of nation-empire, which contains two dimensions, the nation state and the colonial empire. In particular, I will emphasize that the construction of a nation-empire involved gradual integration of these two dimensions. Nevertheless, integration was never easy due obviously to the abovementioned difference and discrimination. Ultimately, the attempt of Meiji Japan in achieving integration and eliminating discrimination within the union of different legal zones turned out to be futile. In particular, for those who were coerced into becoming imperial subjects, their heavy and many obligations far exceeded the narrow and limited rights bestowed upon them.
期刊論文
1.許雪姬(20041200)。日治時期臺灣人的海外活動--在「滿洲」的臺灣醫生。臺灣史研究,11(2),1-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.水野直樹(1997)。戦時期の殖民地支配と「內外地行政一元化」。人文学報,79,77-102。  延伸查詢new window
3.平野義太郎(1944)。大東亞共榮體の構成原理たる家秩序について:特に異系血統を同家化する日本精神。法律新報,765,9。  延伸查詢new window
4.有賀長雄(1901)。臺灣に關する立法の錯誤。国家学会雑誌,14(172),4-5。  延伸查詢new window
5.梅謙次郎(1909)。韓國の法律制度に就て。東京經濟雜誌,1512,7-9。  延伸查詢new window
6.梅謙次郎(1909)。韓國の法律制度に就て。東京經濟雜誌,1514,7-14。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.臨時臺灣土地調查局(1901)。臺灣舊慣制度調查一斑。臺北:臨時臺灣土地調查局。  延伸查詢new window
2.平塚篤(1929)。伊藤博文秘錄。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
3.シレイエス(1950)。第三階段とは何か:他2篇。第三階段とは何か:他2篇。東京。  延伸查詢new window
4.山室信一(1998)。植民帝国.日本の構成と満洲国。帝国という幻想:「大東亜共圈栄」の思想と現実。東京。  延伸查詢new window
5.山室信一(2003)。「国民帝国」論の射程。帝国の研究:原理.類型.関係。名古屋。  延伸查詢new window
6.山邊健太郎(1971)。臺灣(1)。臺灣(1)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
7.手島兵次郎(1909)。臺灣法務成績集:自明治二十八年至明治四十年。臺灣法務成績集:自明治二十八年至明治四十年。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.外務省條約局法規課(1971)。外地法制誌(第四卷)。外地法制誌(第四卷)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
9.後藤新平(1980)。臺灣統治救濟策(1898年1月)。後藤新平文書(12)。水澤。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1929)。拓殖省設置問題ニ對スル朝鮮人ノ動靜報告ノ件。  延伸查詢new window
2.濱田恒之助(1924)。拓殖省設置に關する意見書(1924年7月26日)。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE