兒童及少年安置教養機構離院個案評估及追蹤輔導模式之探究_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	兒童及少年安置教養機構離院個案評估及追蹤輔導模式之探究
書刊名：	兒童及少年福利期刊
作者：	彭淑華／范書菁
作者(外文)：	Pong , Su-hwa／Fan, Shu-ching
出版日期：	2009
卷期：	16
頁次：	頁1-33
主題關鍵詞：	離院照顧；家外安置；機構安置；安置決策；Leaving care；Out-of-home placement；Residential placement；Placement decision-making
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:5 共同引用:115 點閱:316

臺灣地區有關兒童及少年安置教養機構之離院個案評估及追蹤輔導並未獲得應有的重視，雖然「兒童及少年福利法」對於安置期滿或撤銷安置之兒童及少年，明訂直轄市、縣（市）主管機關應續予追蹤輔導一年，「兒童及少年福利機構設置標準」亦將「獨立生活技巧養成及分離準備」及「追蹤輔導」列為安置教養機構應提供之服務，然而，目前各地方主管機關及各安置教養機構對於離院協助與追蹤輔導之實施方式與服務現況究為何？這些均有待深入瞭解。本研究之目的在瞭解主管機關及相關機構對於安置個案離院之評估與決策作法。經由問卷調查、焦點團體及深度訪談等方式，本研究發現：（1）機構自行收容個案之離院評估與追蹤輔導主要由安置機構自行處理；（2）針對直轄市、縣（市）政府委託收容個案，在保護個案上主要為「縣市政府主責」、「縣市政府主責或由受託機構主責」以及「縣市政府及安置機構共同決定」等3種模式；在非保護個案上，除上述保護個案3種模式外，另增「安置機構主責」模式。最後，根據研究結果提出3項建議－「自收個案納入管理機制」、「建立跨單位、跨專業之離院評估機制」與「提供具完整性、延續性與支持性之離院照顧服務」等，以提供相關部門於建構兒童及少年安置教養機構離院照顧服務政策與服務輸送之參據。

以文找文

Children's home or residential placement has existed for centuries; however, it has not been emphasized, as it should be. Some research on the outcomes of children after care indicated that care leavers are still in an inferiority status. Children in care are not well-prepared when they leave their placement, thus have long-term negative impacts on those vulnerable children. Compared to other youths, care leavers have lower educational attainment, higher unemployment, more likely to be homeless in adulthood, loneliness, young parenthood, dependent on state benefits, higher levels of alcohol/drug abuse, in trouble with the law, involved with psychiatric services, and poorer physical health, etc. The decision-making process of leaving the care system and the delivery of services need to be explored. In order to understand the decision-making models of leaving care and the delivery of services after care in Taiwan, the researcher applies for one-year project. Survey, in-depth interview and focus group methods are adopted in this research to get multi-dimensional and rich information. Results indicated multiple models are adopted by the public sector. However, the roles of public and not-for-profit sector are unclear on the services of children in care and aftercare. Leaving care policy is not established, neither are the regulations and guidance of leaving care in Taiwan. The delivery of services is needed to be examined as well. Some implications are discussed to reshape and modify our service system toward care leavers. Leaving care policy and related regulations and guidance are all needed in the future. The classification of diverse children and providing adequate services for those care leavers are also necessary. Hopefully, children in care and after can benefit from our leaving care system in the recent future.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Newton, R. R.、Litrownik, A. J.、Landsverk, J. A.(2000)。Children and Youth in Foster Care: Disentangling the Relationship between Problem Behaviors and Number of Placements。Child Abuse & Neglect，24，1363-1373。
2.	Martin, P. Y.、Jackson, S.(2002)。Educational Success for Children in Public Care: Advice from a Group of High Achievers。Child and Family Social Work，7，121-130。
3.	Duncan, L.(1991)。Factors affecting the foster care placement decision: an analysis of National Survey Data。American Journal of Orthopsychiatry，61(2)，272-281。
4.	Glisson, C.、Peters, C.、Martin, L.(1998)。Factors Affecting Case Management Recommendations for Children Entering State Custody。Social Service Review，72(4)，521-544。
5.	洪昭蓉(1995)。台灣省高雄育幼院院童學業成就表現影響因素之研究。社會福利，117，51-52。延伸查詢
6.	Collins, M. E.、Schwartz, I. M.、Epstein, L.(2001)。Risk factors for adult imprisonment in a sample of youth released from residential child care。Children and Youth Services Review，23(3)，203-226。
7.	Colton, M.(2002)。Factors associated with abuse in residential child care institution。Children & Society，16，33-44。
8.	DePanfilis, D.、Girvin, H.(2005)。Investigating child maltreatment in out-of-home care: Barriers to effective decisionmaking。Children and Youth Services Review，27，353-374。
9.	Freundlich, M.、Avery, R. J.(2005)。Planning for permanency for youth in congregate care。Children and Youth Services Review，27，115-134。
10.	Park, J. M.、Metraux, S.、Brodbar, G.、Gul-hane, D. P.(2004)。Public shelter admission among young adults with child welfare histories by type of service and type of exit。Social Service Review，78(2)，284-303。
11.	Shlonsky, A.、Wagner, D.(2005)。The next step; Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management。Children and Youth Services Review，27，409-427。
12.	Barber, J.、Delfabbro, P.(2005)。Children’s adjustment to long-term foster care。Children and Youth Services Review，27，329-340。
13.	Britner, P. A.、Mossier, D. G.(2002)。Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse。Child Abuse & Neglect，26，317-332。
14.	Glisson, C.(1994)。The effects of services coordination teams on outcomes for children in state custody。Administration in Social Work，18，1-23。
15.	Glisson, C.(1996)。Judicial and service decisions for children entering state custody: The limited role of mental health。Social Science Review，70，257-281。
16.	Johnson-Reid, M.、Barth, R. P.(2000)。From placement to prison: The path to adolescent incarceration from child welfare supervised foster or group care。Children and Youth Services Review，22(7)，493-516。
17.	Kerman, B.、Wildfire, J.、Barth, R. P.(2002)。Outcomes for Young Adults Who Experienced Foster Care。Children and Youth Services Review，24(5)，319-344。
18.	Knapp, M、Baines, B.、Bryson, D.、Lewis, J.(1987)。Modeling the initial placement decision for children received into care。Children and Youth Services Review，9，1-15。
19.	Littell, J.(2005)。Lessons from a systematic review of effects of multisystemic therapy。Children and Youth Services Review，27，445-463。
20.	Munro, E.(2005)。Improving practice: Child protection as a systems problem。Children and Youth Services Review，27，375-391。
21.	Rossi, P. H.、Schuerman, J.、Budde, S.(1999)。Understanding decisions about child maltreatment。Evaluation Review，23(6)，579-598。
22.	Ryan, J. P.、Testa, M. F.(2005)。Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability。Children and Youth Services Review，27，227-249。
23.	Schuerman, J.、Rossi, P. H.、Budde, S.(1999)。Decisions on placement and family preservation。Evaluation Review，23，599-618。
24.	Schwalbe, C.(2004)。Re-visioning risk assessment for human service decision making。Children and Youth Services Review，26，561-576。
25.	Smith, B. D.、Donovan, S. E. F.(2003)。Child welfare practice in organizational and institutional context。Social Service Review，77(4)，541-563。
26.	Little, M.、Kohm, A.、Thompson, R.(2005)。The impact of residential placement on child development: Research and policy implications。International Journal of Social Welfare，14(3)，200-209。
27.	Anglin, James P.(2004)。Creating "Well-functioning" Residential Care and Defining Its Place in a System of Care。Child and Youth Care Forum，33(3)，175-192。
28.	許如悅、鄭麗珍(2003)。兒保工作人員對兒虐案件之風險硏判與處遇決策。社會政策與社會工作學刊，7(1)，163-213。延伸查詢
29.	DePanfilis, D.、Scannapieco, M.(1994)。Assessment the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: Decision-making models。Child Welfare，73(3)，229-245。
30.	Nicholas, B.、Roberts, S.、Wurr, C.(2003)。Looked after Children in Residential Homes。Child and Adolescent Mental Health，8(2)，78-83。
31.	Rutter, M.(2000)。Children in substitute care: some conceptual considerations and research implications。Children and Youth Services Review，22(9/10)，685-703。
32.	Schneiderman, M、Connors, M. M.、Fribourg, A.、Gries, L.、Gonzales, M.(1998)。Mental health services for children in out-of-home care。Child Welfare，77(1)，29-40。
33.	Urquiza, A. J.、Wirtz, S. J.、Peterson, M. S.、Singer, V. A.(1994)。Screening and evaluating abused and neglected children entering protective custody。Child Welfare，73(2)，155-171。
34.	Willumsen, E.、Skivenes, M.(2005)。Collaboration between service users and professionals: Legitimate decisions in child protection-A Norwegian model。Child and Family Social Work，10，197-206。
35.	劉德勝(19851100)。育幼院兒童的自我概念與生活適應。青少年兒童福利學刊，8，22-30。延伸查詢
36.	彭淑華(20070600)。「寧缺毋濫」？「寧濫毋缺」？--兒童少年保護工作人員機構安置決策困境之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，20(2)，127-154。延伸查詢
37.	Briar, S.(1963)。Clinical Judgments in Foster Care Placement。Child Welfare，42，161-169。

會議論文
1.	Pinkerton, J.、Coyle, D.(2008)。Leaving care in the UK: General reflections on developments and delivery。2008 International Conference on Developing & Delivering Care Leaving Services for Youth in Out-of-home Care。

研究報告
1.	彭淑華(2007)。95年度兒童及少年安置機構評鑑總報告。延伸查詢
2.	彭淑華、范書菁(2009)。兒童及少年安置教養機構離院個案評估及追蹤輔導研究。延伸查詢
3.	Dixon, J.、Lee, J.、Wade, J.、Byford, S.、Weatherly, H.(2004)。Young people leaving care: An evaluation of costs and out-comes。York：University of York。
4.	余漢儀(1997)。兒童保護模式之探討--兼論社工決策及家外安置 (計畫編號：NSC86-2412-H-002-004)。延伸查詢

學位論文
1.	劉美芝(2000)。機構安置受虐兒童社會適應之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。延伸查詢
2.	邱智慧(1988)。家庭模式兒童福利機構內兒童生活適應之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Stein, M.(2004)。What Works for Young People Leaving Care?。Barnardos。
2.	Hai, N.、Williams, A.(2004)。Implementing the children (Leaving Care) Act 2000, the experience of eight London boroughs。London：National Children's Bureau。
3.	Hazel, N.、Hagell, A.、Liddle, M.、Archer, D.、Grimshaw, R.、King, J.(2000)。Detention and training: Assessment of the detention and training order and its impact on the secure estate across England and Wales。London：Youth Justice Board。
4.	Biehal, N.、Clayden, J.、Stein, M.、Wade, J.(1995)。Moving on: Young people and leaving care schemes。London, England：HMSO。
5.	Child Welfare League of America(1999)。CWLA standards of excellence for services for abused or neglected children and their families。Washington, DC：Child Welfare League of America。
6.	Costin, L.B.、Bell, C. A.、Downs, D. W.(1991)。Child welfare policies and practice。New York：Longman。
7.	Dixon, J.、Stein, M.(2002)。Still a bairn: Throughcare and aftercare services in Scotland, Final report to the Scottish Executive。Edinburgh：Scottish Executive。
8.	Dixon, J.、Stein, M.(2005)。Leaving care: Throughcare and aftercare in Scotland。London, England：Jessica Kingsley Publishers。
9.	House of Commons(2009)。Looked-after children. Children, Schools and Families Committee, Third Report of Session 2008-09。London：The Stationery Office Limited。
10.	Phillips, M. H.、Shyne, A. W.、Sherman, E. A.、Haring, B. L.(1971)。Factors associated with placement decisions in child welfare。New York：Child Welfare League of America。
11.	Scotland’s Commissioner for Children and Young People(2008)。Sweet 16? The age of leaving care in Scotland。Scotland：SCCYP。
12.	Crossen-Tower, C.(2001)。Exploring child welfare: a practice perspective。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。
13.	Doran, L.、Berliner, L.(2001)。Placement decisions for children in long-term care: Innovative practices and literature review。Olympia, WA：Washington State Institute for Public Policy。
14.	Department of Health and Social Security(1985)。Social work decisions in child care: Recent research findings and their implications。London：HMSO。
15.	Lipsky, M.(1980)。Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas o f the individual in public services。New York：Russell Sage Foundation。
16.	Downs, S. W.、Moore, E.、McFadden, E. J.、Costin, L. B.(2000)。Child welfare and family services: Policies and practice。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。
17.	Reamer, F. G.、包承恩、王永慈(2000)。社會工作價値與倫理。臺北：洪葉。延伸查詢
18.	余漢儀(1995)。兒童虐待：現象檢視與問題反思。台北：巨流圖書公司。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	彭淑華(2008)。兒童福利政策脈絡。兒童福利：理論與實務。臺北：偉華書局。延伸查詢
2.	Jackson, S.(2002)。Promoting stability and continuity in care away from home。What works for children。Buckingham：Open University Press。
3.	VanBergeijk, E. O.、McGowan, B. G.(2001)。Children in foster care。Handbook of social work practice with vulnerable and resilient populations。New York：Columbia University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	兒童及少年安置教養機構社會工作人員之在職訓練課程規劃
2.	兒童及少年安置及教養機構評鑑制度之現況檢視與未來發展取向之省思
3.	被隱沒的聲音：離開家外安置照顧青年之自立生活經驗
4.	探討重複開案受虐兒童家庭特質及社工處遇
5.	臺灣社會工作者職場抗拒類型之研究--以兒少保社工者為例
6.	「浮萍有依方案」--發展長期機構安置兒少的永續計畫
7.	處罰父母、拯救小孩？臺灣強制性親職教育輔導的結果評估：以兒虐再通報率為指標
8.	伴他度過暴風雨後的平靜--談歷經機構安置自立生活者生活與心理困境
9.	家庭再思考：從保護工作實務現場的觀察談起
10.	兒少「表意權」實質意涵的初探--以被安置兒少發聲的權利為中心
11.	兒童權利公約之後：臺灣兒少福利發展
12.	臺灣社區工作觀點與保護性社會工作發展之初探
13.	什麼要保護未成年人？兒少福利、法律與歷史的分析
14.	兒少保護實務研判的挑戰與因應
15.	兒童保護on call英雄的圖像

1.	神性與異化：宗教型兒少安置機構之建制民族誌
2.	非自願少年留院適應歷程之探討
3.	諮商心理師與社工師在協助遭逢家庭內性侵害兒童進行家庭重聚之處遇經驗探究
4.	建立初入安置機構兒童之定向遊戲治療工作模式
5.	高風險家庭處遇整合困境之研究-台灣中部五縣市社工員的觀點
6.	在兒童安置機構中青少年復原力與憂鬱情緒之相關研究
7.	兒童發展的風險治理：發展遲緩、監管網絡與親職政治
8.	家有學齡前幼童母親在教養環境中母職的建構歷程-社會工作的視角
9.	家庭脈絡對大學生心理福祉的影響
10.	遭受性侵害女性的母職經驗之研究
11.	澳洲、香港、日本之家事商談相關制度比較研究－兼論我國家事商談制度之現況與發展
12.	子女權利與親權制度
13.	經濟發展、婦女就業與家庭變遷：台灣經驗之觀察

1.	家庭與家人關係
2.	兒童福利
3.	兒時性創傷與社會工作處遇
4.	社會政策與社會立法
5.	矯正社會工作與諮商 : 犯罪防治的有效要素
6.	被害者學新論
7.	法律社會工作
8.	親職暴力處遇 : 介入與省思
9.	兒童少年保護福利服務
10.	幼兒的身體與動作發展及輔導
11.	臺灣兒童及少年福利政策與法令制度之發展
12.	暴力犯罪行為
13.	兒童虐待之定義
14.	家庭問題

無相關著作

1.	離開安置機構青年之自立生活現況與相關經驗初探
2.	臺灣兒童少年安置機構政策與實務發展之探討
3.	對我國自立生活方案的芻議
4.	離院青年自立生活之優勢經驗 : 社會工作者的觀點
5.	敘事治療的「抗拒」觀點
6.	遵／不遵醫囑？國家偏遠醫療治理與達悟族精神失序者的「混亂敘事」
7.	戰後第一世代詩人李弦〈古城行〉與林梵〈某個時間的對位法〉之國／古都歷史敘事辯證
8.	歷代志為先知性的歷史敘事：一個「文類」的分析
9.	安置機構少女自立生活能力培育方案之反思與回饋：輔導人員之觀點
10.	癌症病人的復原力及其護理處置
11.	建構弱勢少年復原力的社會工作專業服務輸送體系
12.	《兒童及少年福利與權益保障法》修正後安置離院轉銜與照顧政策之變遷
13.	經濟弱勢大學生情意健康之探討：易受傷害性與復原力因子效果分析
14.	照亮自立少年的未來：獨立生活服務作為離開安置系統少年成功重返社區的關鍵

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫