:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:團體動力學在教學行動研究之應用探究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:湯梓辰
作者(外文):Tang, Tzu-chen
出版日期:2010
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁145-171
主題關鍵詞:行動研究團體動力學團體決策問題解決溝通互動Kurt LewinAction researchGroup dynamicDecision-makingProblem solvingInteraction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:72
  • 點閱點閱:96
行動研究的傳統是受到Kurt Lewin團體動力學的強烈影響,相信行動的觀點需要聚焦在團體合作和研究過程的再循環以及回歸的本質之中。團體雖然是個人的集合體,但絕非是烏合之眾,是需要一個完整個體的形成過程。而團體之所以存在是有一定的理由,其目的主要是集合眾人的力量,共同追尋一個目標。 因此,本文之目的主要是探討團體動力學在教學行動研究的應用,以Kurt Lewin團體動力學的涵義、應用基本模式、研究範疇,以及行動研究傳統的背景、方法、以及應用模式為基礎,探討團體動力學在行動研究上的團體決策、問題解決、溝通互動上之應用。最後,以國內博碩士論文的實證研究為例,分析並探討目前國內教學行動研究在團體動力學之應用,以及其構想之可行性。 綜以上所述,本文發現Kurt Lewin的團體動力學已成為教學行動研究的一種研究範疇。而目前國內許多實證行動研究皆採用此模式來進行研究。因此我們可知此教學模式是一個可實際運作的方式,其可提升教師的思慮以及教師決策的能力。 因此,本文建議團體動力學之教學行動研究可作為目前國內課程與教學的引導教學架構,並建議可作為國內行動研究之重要研究範疇之一。
The traditions of action research has received the huge influences from Kurt Lewin’s group dynamics, which believes the group cooperation and the action research process should start in a circulated and returnable way. In the theory of group dynamic, a group can be an individual aggregate, but it cannot be a motley crew. A group needs to see itself as a complete individual. A group, which can exit, always has certain rationales. The main reason of being a group is to gather people’s power and track down to a main goal together. The purpose of this paper is to explore the idea "how can we implement group dynamics into action research?" This paper used Kurt Lewin’s idea of group dynamic as a basic to discuss group dynamic’s meaning, application formats, and research. Then, the paper has analyzed action research’s themes and historical background, and explores action research’s backgrounds, methods, and applications. Finally, the paper explored the group dynamic’s application into action research’s decision-making, problem solving, and interaction. According to the above statements, this paper had found that Kurt Lewin’s group dynamics already became one of the categories in action research. Presently, there are lots of empirical studies which used this category of action research to conduct an instruction. We can know that this category is a feasible way. It can promote teachers’ thinking and decision making. Therefore, this paper is suggested that we can use group dynamics in instruction and curriculum.
學位論文
1.林瑞吉(2008)。國小教師諮詢之行動研究:一位輔導工作者的實踐故事(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪昭岑(2006)。多元智能融入國小低年級生命教育課程之行動研究--以應用繪本為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪昭岑(2006)。多元智能融入國小低年級生命教育課程之行動研究--以應用繪本為例(碩士論文)。國立台北教育大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳金聰(2008)。精進國小教師的數學專業知能之行動研究(博士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳淑娟(2008)。國小教師發展數學提問能力之合作行動研究(博士論文)。國立臺南大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉妙錦(2008)。增進國小高年級學童意志控制力之課程教學行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.梁桐仙(2007)。生命教育創造思考教學策略行動研究—以小學生關懷老人方案為例,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.梁桐仙(2007)。生命教育創造思考教學策略行動研究--以小學生關懷老人方案為例。國立台北教育大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林振春、王秋絨(1992)。團體輔導工作。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.林坤輝(2002)。小團體動力學。臺北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lewin, K.(1936)。Principles of Typological Psychology。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Corey, Stephen M.(1953)。Action Research to Improve School Practices。New York:Teachers College Columbia University。  new window
5.宋鎮照(2000)。團體動力學。台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘正德(2005)。團體動力學。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.楊極東(1992)。團體輔導--理論與實務。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Cartwright, D.、Zander, A.(1968)。Group dynamics: Research and theory。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
9.Ellis, D. G.、Fisher, B. A.(1994)。Small group decision making: Communication and the group process。NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Johnson, David W.、Johnson, Frank P.(1991)。Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
11.Forsyth, Donelson R.(1990)。Group dynamics。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
12.Lewin, Kurt、Cartwright, Dorwin(1951)。Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers。Harper & Row。  new window
13.楊極東(1992)。團體輔導理論與實務。台北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Grundy, S.(1982)。Three Modes Of Action Research。The Action Research Reader (3rd ed)。Geelong。  new window
15.MaTaggart R.(1997)。Guiding Principles for Participatory Action Research。Participatory action consequences。  new window
16.Noffle, S(1997)。Themes and tension in US action research: Towards historical analysis。International Action Research。London。  new window
17.Fischer, J(1996)。Open to ideas: Developing a framework for your research。Teachers doing research: practical possibilities。Mahwah, JK。  new window
18.Grundy, S.(1982)。Three Modes Of Action Research。The Action Research Reader。Geelong。  new window
19.MaTaggart R.(1997)。Guiding Principles for Participatory Action Research。Participatory action consequences。  new window
20.Noffle, S(1997)。Themes and tension in US action research: Towards historical analysis。International Action Research。London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Zeichner, K. Z.、Noffke, S. E.(2001)。Practitioner Research。Handbook of Research on Teaching。American Educational Research Association。  new window
2.Elliott, J.(1997)。School-Based Curriculum Development and Action Research in the United Kingdom。International Action Research A Casebook for Educational Reform。London:Falmer。  new window
3.Fischer, J.(1996)。Open to ideas: Developing a framework for your research。Teachers doing research: practical possibilities。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE