臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：銀合歡移除及栽植作業對現地保留原生木本植物之短期影響--以墾丁海岸林復舊地為例
書刊名：國家公園學報
作者：王相華／陳芬蕙
作者(外文)：Wang, Hsiang-hua／Chen, Fen-hui
出版日期：2010
卷期：20:1
頁次：頁15-25
主題關鍵詞：銀合歡；外來種；入侵種；復舊；植生動態；Leucaena leucocephala；Exotic species；Invasive species；Restoration；Vegetation dynamics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:25
墾丁國家公園內遭外來種銀合歡入侵情形嚴重，急需進行有關銀合歡移除及復舊作業的相關研究。詴驗地作業前為農耕地廢棄後遭銀合歡入侵之林地，成(幼)樹(DBH≧1cm)的密度為7,645株/ha，其中銀合歡占72%。詴驗地分為12 m與6 m兩種寬度之銀合歡移除帶，移除帶之間有3 m之保留帶，以達遮蔭及防風效果。銀合歡於2008年梅雨季前移除，並於作業前後進行現地保留原生木本植物之調查。結果顯示銀合歡移除及栽植作業不會減少成(幼)樹的密度及物種數，但會降低其樹冠面積，此外10月時冠幅的大幅下降則導因於颱風干擾。相對的，移除作業會明顯降低稚樹(DBH<1 cm，高度≧50 cm)及幼苗(高度<50 cm)的密度及物種數，且12 m移除帶的受害情形多比6 m顯著，密度減少約1/3。整體來說，銀合歡移除作業對幼小木本植物衝擊較大，移除帶越寬植生受到的影響也越大。但本研究結果顯示，多數受擾動的植生可在一個生長季內經由幼苗庫與種子庫等更新材料快速補充恢復，但未來植生更新之速度與方向，則需要進一步的監測研究。
Leucaena leucocephala is a widely-spread exotic invasive species that has seriously threatened the natural ecosystem in Kenting National Park. Therefore, L. leucocephala removal and native vegetation restoration are urgent issues to be addressed. A 2.2-ha experimental site, an abandoned farm, was dominated by L. leucocephala before treatment. Density of all trees with DBH≧1cm was 7,645 trees/ha, with 72% being L. leucocephala. There were two widths of removal zone, 12-m and 6-m, respectively, and a 3-m preservation zone (no L. leucocephala removal) between the removal zones. Woody plant surveys were conducted before and after removal of L. leucocephala prior to the rainy season in May 2008. Our results showed that L. leucocephala removal and restoration planting did not affect trees with DBH≧1 cm in terms of density and species richness, but canopy area of trees was reduced, especially in the 12-m removal zone. Furthermore, considerable canopy area was reduced in October as a result of typhoon disturbance. In contrast, removal of L. leucocephala significantly decreased the density and species richness of saplings (DBH<1 cm and height≧50 cm) and seedlings (height<50 cm), especially in the 12- removal zone. Average density of saplings and seedlings was reduced by 1/3. Overall, L. leucocephala removal had more impact on smaller trees. Vegetation was affected slightly more in wider removal zones. However, most of the disturbed vegetations would recover after a growing season through various regeneration sources, such as seedling bank and seed bank. Long-term monitoring is suggested to fully understand the effects of L. leucocephala removal on subsequent vegetation regeneration.
期刊論文
1.鍾玉龍、呂明倫(20060600)。SPOT衛星影像於墾丁國家公園銀合歡入侵分布之繪製。臺灣林業科學，21(2)，167-177。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂明倫、鍾玉龍(20070700)。墾丁國家公園銀合歡空間分布特徵之研究。特有生物研究，9(2)，7-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.王相華、洪聖峰(20050600)。銀合歡藥劑注射防除效果及林相復舊方式。中華民國雜草學會會刊，26(1)，15-32。  延伸查詢new window
4.王相華、洪聖峰、郭耀綸、陳芬蕙(2009)。復舊苗木在墾丁熱帶海岸林銀合歡防除地之初期生長。國家公園學報，19(1)，9-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Biggerstaff, M. S.、Beck, C. W.(2007)。Effects of method of English Ivy removal and seed addition on regeneration of vegetation in a southeastern Piedmont Forest。American Midland Naturalist，158(1)，206-220。  new window
6.Feyera, S.、Beck, E.、Luttge, U.(2002)。Exotic trees as nurse-trees for the regeneration of natural tropical forests。Trees: structure and function，16(4-5)，245-249。  new window
7.Flory, S. L.、Clay, K.(2009)。Invasive plant removal method determines native plant community responses。Journal of Applied Ecology，46(2)，434-442。  new window
8.Hardwick, K.、Healey, J. R.、Elliott, S.、Blakesley, D.(2004)。Research needs for restoring seasonal tropical forests in Thailand: accelerated natural regeneration。New Forests，27(3)，285-302。  new window
9.Kennedy, T. A.、Naeem, S.、Howe, K. M.、Knops, J. M. H.、Tilman, D.、Reich, P.(2002)。Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion。Nature，417(6889)，636-638。  new window
10.Lamb, D.、Erskine, P. D.、Parrotta, J. A.(2005)。Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes。Science，310(5754)，1628-1632。  new window
11.Ostertag, R.、Cordell, S.、Michaud, J.、Cole, T.C.、Schulten, J. R.、Publico, K. M.、Enoka, J. H.(2009)。Ecosystem and restoration consequences of invasive woody species removal in Hawaiian lowland wet forest。Ecosystems，12(3)，503-515。  new window
12.Simmons, M. T.、Windhager, S.、Power, P.、Lott, J.、Lyons, R. K.、Schwope, C.(2007)。Selective and non-selective control of invasive plants: The short-term effects of growing-season prescribed fire, herbicide, and mowing in two Texas prairies。Restoration Ecology，15(4)，662-669。  new window
13.Webb, S. L.、Pendergast, T. H. I.、Dwyer, M. E.(2001)。Response of native and exotic maple seedling banks to removal of the exotic, invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides)。Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society，128(2)，141-149。  new window
14.Vitousek, P. M.、D'Antonio, C. M.、Loope, L. L.、Westbrooks, R.(1996)。Biological invasions as global environmental change。American scientist，84(5)，468-478。  new window
15.Wakibara, J. V.、Mnaya, B. J.(2002)。Possible control of Senna spectabilis (Caesalpiniaceae), an invasive tree in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania。ORYX，36(4)，357-363。  new window
16.Zavaleta, E. S.、Hobbs, R. J.、Mooney, H. A.(2001)。Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context。Trends in Ecology & Evolution，16(8)，454-459。  new window
17.Shono, K.、Cadaweng, E. A.、Durst, P. B.(2007)。Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands。Restoration Ecology，15(4)，620-626。  new window
18.郭幸榮(2005)。森林生態復育之理論與實例。臺灣林業，31(1)，46-54。  延伸查詢new window
19.Chou, C. H.、Kuo, Y. L.(1986)。Allelopathic research of subtropical vegetation in Taiwan。Journal of Chemical Ecology，12(6)，1431-1448。  new window
20.Blakesley, D.、Hardwick, K.、Elliott, S.(2002)。Research needs for restoring tropical forests in Southeast Asia for wildlife conservation: framework species selection and seed propagation。New Forests，24(3)，165-174。  new window
21.Denslow, J. S.(2007)。Managing dominance of invasive plants in wildlands。Current Science，93(11)，1579-1586。  new window
22.Diaz, S.、Symstad, A. J.、Chapin, F. S.、Wardle, D. A.、Huenneke, L. F.(2003)。Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments。Trends in Ecology & Evolution，18(3)，140-146。  new window
23.Mason, T. J.、French, K.(2007)。Management regimes for a plant invader differentially impact resident communities。Biological Conservation，136(2)，246-259。  new window
24.Florentine, S. K.、Westbrooke, M. E.(2004)。Evaluation of alternative approaches to rainforest restoration on abandoned pasturelands in tropical North Queensland。Australia Land Degradation & Development，15(1)，1-13。  new window
25.Gooden, B.、French, K.、Turner, P. J.(2009)。Invasion and management of a woody plant, Lantana camara L., alters vegetation diversity within wet sclerophyll forest in southeastern Australia。Forest Ecology and Management，257(3)，960-967。  new window
會議論文
1.蔣慕琰、徐玲明、袁秋英、陳富永、蔣永正(2003)。台灣外來植物之危害與生態。花蓮, 台灣。97-109。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.呂福原、陳民安(2002)。墾丁國家公園外來種植物對原生植群之影響-以銀合歡為例。  延伸查詢new window
2.許正一(2009)。墾丁熱帶海岸林天然更新復舊潛力評估：土壤特性及其對苗木栽植之影響。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉嘉卿(2005)。太魯閣國家公園外來植物分布、播遷機制與衝擊評估。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Loope, L. L.(1993)。An overview of problems with introduced plant species in national parks and biosphere reserves of the United States。Alien plant invasions in native ecosystems of Hawai`i: management and research \\ C. P. Stone ; C. W. Smith ; J. T. Tunison (eds.)。Honolulu, Hawaii。  new window
2.Walton, C.(2003)。Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) in Queensland。Queensland。  new window
其他
1.Global Invasive Species Database, GISD(2006)。Global invasive species database。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：756（臺灣：745，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2687178 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68491060
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上