The European Union and the Two Sides of the Taiwan Strait (1996~2009)--A Content Analysis_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	The European Union and the Two Sides of the Taiwan Strait (1996~2009)--A Content Analysis
書刊名：	Issues & Studies
作者：	湯紹成Tang, Shaocheng)
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	46:1
頁次：	頁55-87
主題關鍵詞：	Cross-strait relations；European union；European council；European commission；European parliament
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:1 點閱:6

The author uses content analysis to examine the European Union’s (EU’s) policy on relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait from 1996 to 2009. During this period, the EU devoted increasing amounts of attention to this flashpoint in East Asia. For geographical reasons, theEU has fewer strategic interests in this region than the United States. Therefore trade and economic interests are high on the EU agenda. Nonetheless,these interests can only be secured if there is peace and stability between the two sides of the Strait. The entry of new member states into the EU since 2004 may have influenced its policy on cross-Strait relations. The firm adherence to democratic values among EU member states is the main reason behind the incessant friction between these states and China. This culminated in the abrupt canceling of the eleventh Sino-EU summit meeting by Beijing in protest at the Dalai Lama’s tour of Europe in 2008.Thanks to the change of government in Taipei in May that year, a new era of reconciliation with Beijing has begun. This gives China a free hand to tackle other issues of interest. Also, China has sufferedmuch less from the recent global financial crisis than either the United States or Europe. Yet there is too much at stake for both China and the EU for them to be at odds with each other in the long run.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Tang, S. C.(200509)。The EU's policy towards China and the arms embargo。Asia Europe Journal，3(3)，313-321。
2.	Tubilewicz, Czeslaw(20051200)。The Scrooge Effect: Taiwan's Economic Diplomacy toward Central Europe, 1988-2005。Issues & Studies，41(4)，209-249。

會議論文
1.	Gilson, Julie(2002)。Asia Meets Europe: Inter-regionalism and the Asia-Europe Meeting。Cheltenham：Edward Elgar Publishing。

圖書
1.	Viotti, Paul R.、Kauppi, Mark V.(1999)。International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond。Boston：Macmillan。
2.	王萬里(2002)。台灣與歐盟。台北：五南。延伸查詢
3.	Krippendorff, Klaus(2004)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology。Sage Publications。
4.	Haas, Ernst Bernard(1964)。Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization。Stanford University Press。
5.	Lindberg, Leon N.(1963)。The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration。Stanford University Press。

其他
1.	Archer, Clive, Judy Batt, Stephen George, and Michael Newman(2002)。The European Union and Asian Countries。
2.	Dent, Christopher(1999)。The European Union and East Asia: An Economic Relationship。
3.	Edwards, Geoffrey(2006)。The New Member States and the Making of EU Foreign Policy。
4.	Etzioni, Amitai(1965)。Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces。
5.	Haas, Ernst(1975)。The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory。
6.	Ifestos, Panayiotis(1987)。European Political Cooperation。
7.	Jakobsen, Linda(2005)。A Greater Chinese Union。
8.	lung, Chang-Hwa(2002)。Kooperation zwischen der Europaeischen Union und Ostasien am Beispiel der neuen asiatisch-europaeischen Zusammenarbeit im Rahmen des ASEM (Asia-Europe Meeting)。
9.	Kindermann, Gottfried-Karl(1986)。Grundelemente der Weltpolitik。
10.	Kole, William J.(2006)。New EU Members Reaffirm Ties with U.S.。
11.	Lan, Yuchun(2004)。The European Parliament and the China-Taiwan Issue: An Empirical Approach。
12.	Longhurst, Kerry and Marcin Zaborowski , eds(2005)。Old Europe, New Europe and the Transatlantic Security Agenda。
13.	Michelmann, Hans J. and Panayotis Soldatos, eds.(1994)。European Integration: Theories and Approaches。
14.	Mouritz, Hans(2006)。Choosing Sides in the European Iraq Conflict: A Test of New Geopolitical Theory。
15.	Mueller-Brandeck-Bocquet, Gisela, ed(2002)。Europaeische Aussenpolitik。
16.	Rosamond, Ben(2005)。The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism ofErnst Haas。
17.	Ruggie, John Gerard, Peter Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane, and Philippe C. Schmitter(2005)。Transformations in World Politics: The InteLlectual Contributions of Ernst B. Haas。
18.	Sandholtz, Wayne, and Al ec Stone Sweet, eds(1998)。European Integration and Supranational Governance。
19.	Schucher, Gtinter and Margot Schtiller, eds(2005)。Perspectives on cross-Strait Relations: Views from Europe。
20.	Shepherd, Robin(2007)。Romania, Bulgaria, and the EU's Future。
21.	Smith, Hazel(2002)。European Foreign Policy。
22.	Strange, Jim, and Corrado Molteni, eds(2000)。The European Union and ASEAN: Trade and Investment Issues。
23.	Tang, Shaocheng(2003)。EU's Taiwan Policy in the Light of Its China Policy。
24.	Tang, Shaocheng(2009)。Relations across the Taiwan Strait。
25.	Thiel, Elke(1994)。Die Europaeische Union。
26.	Tomala, Karin(2005)。Poland and the Cross-Strait Relations since the End of the Cold War。
27.	(20091115)。United Daily。
28.	Waltz, Kenneth(1990)。Realist Thought and Neo-Realist Theory。
29.	Weidenfeld, Werner, and Wolfgang Wessels, eds(2002)。Europa van A bis Z - Taschenbuch der Europaeischenlntegration。
30.	White, Brian(2001)。Understanding European Foreign Policy。
31.	Yeo, Lay Hwee(2003)。Asia and Europe。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	Old Hat, New Rhetoric: The EU's Policy toward Taiwan after the Fifth Enlargement
2.	The Scrooge Effect: Taiwan's Economic Diplomacy toward Central Europe, 1988-2005

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫