In 2008, William S. Murray published an article “Revisiting Taiwan’s Defense Strategy” calling for an army-centric “porcupine strategy.” The article gathered significant attention from the highest authorities in Taipei but was condemned roundly. This essay argues that, except fora few flaws, Murray’s article is generally correct, and that the criticisms do not withstand scrutiny. Based on Taiwan’s strategy up to 2008, these criticisms stem from a perception of low Taiwanese morale, but provide no solutions to the issues they raise. Taking into consideration the post-2008 developments,this essay argues that, by turning Taiwan’s China policy in a more widely supportable direction, the will to fight is strengthened. The essay then provides three simple but fundamental recommendations: have amore balanced force structure, avoid the allure of retaliation, and talk straight.