:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:農產品進口傾銷損髓害認定之經濟評估方法與案例分析--以臺灣椰子與柿子產品為例
書刊名:貿易調查叢刊
作者:李淑媛 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Shu-yuan
出版日期:2009
卷期:20:2
頁次:頁41-75
主題關鍵詞:傾銷行為產業損害COMPAS模型DumpingCOMPAS modelInjury
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:82
摘 要 當前國際貿易體系雖然大力鼓吹自由貿易,自1980 年之後,反傾銷稅之課 徵已經變成最普遍的貿易保護工具之一。而農產品因產品特性與資料取得不 易,需有一即時且具有參考價值之產業損害評估方法。本研究嘗試採用目前普 受重視且執行方便的COMPAS 模型來進行農產品產業損害認定之分析,並為降 低參數投入之不確定性利用機率分配進行參數之描述,且根據Blonigen and Prusa (2001)統計於1987-1999年WTO會員國農產品反傾銷案件主要集中於水果 產品、糖以及肉類製品三大類,自水果產品中挑選於台灣加入WTO 後,進口 量激增的柿子與椰子作為研究對象,探討如何修正與應用傳統COMPAS 模型進 行相關農產品產業損害認定之分析。研究結果發現:傾銷行為對進口國國內產 業確實會帶來價格、產量以及收益上的損害,比較加入機率機制之COMPAS 模 型與傳統COMPAS 模型之實證結果發現,於價格面的估計單依傳統COMPAS 模型的八個情境所推估出來的影響會有低估的現象,而在產量面則呈現高估的 現象。
Abstract The agricultural sector is undoubtedly the core of economic development. Although the sector is subject to intense protectionism, the number of lawsuits for dumping agricultural products filed has not increased noticeably. Blonigen (2003) discovered that in all lawsuits filed by WTO members, the successful cases of antidumping agricultural products only accounted for 6 %. This study reveals that difficulties in identifying damage standards and in collecting tangible information are the chief reasons explaining the low percentage of filed lawsuits of antidumping agricultural products. Hence we need a more objective, accurate and straightaway measurement for industrial damage identification. In our study, we applied COMPAS model for analysis, and we found that a probabilistic model that takes into account the uncertainty surrounding economic parameter reduces the risk of misjudging the effect of dumping on the domestic industry. Based on the statistic data by Prusa (2001), most of the filed lawsuits of antidumping agricultural products are in fruits, sugar and meat. We chose coconut and persimmon products as our research targets. Simulation results show that dumping will cause injury to coconut and persimmon industries. And limiting the analysis to the 8 scenarios of COMPAS model might tend to overstate the overall effect on the domestic industry in terms of quantity of output.
期刊論文
1.Armington, Paul S.(1969)。The Geographic Pattern of Trade and the Effects of Price changes。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),176-199。  new window
2.Armington, P. S.(1969)。A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),159-178。  new window
3.林永樂(19950600)。產業損害認定方法之探討。進口救濟論叢,6,201-213。  延伸查詢new window
4.林永樂(19951200)。產業損害認定方法之探討。進口救濟論叢,7,39-52。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃智輝(20060600)。臺灣農產品救助政策與進品救濟制度運用之效益分析。農業經濟叢刊,11(2),309-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Blonigen, Bruce A.,(2002)。“Tariff-jumping antidumping duties.”。Journal of International Economics,57,31–49。  new window
會議論文
1.Watson, Paul S.(1996)。International Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws and Processes。Seminar on Injury Investigation International Trade Commisssion, Minister of Economy Affairs。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.黃鴻與辛炳隆(1997)。《產業損害計量經濟分析方法之研究》。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾巨威(1995)。《進口救濟有關產業損害程度及因果關係認定之研究》。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅昌發(1994)。「美國反傾銷稅及平衡稅法中損害要件之研究」。  延伸查詢new window
4.Blonigen, Bruce A., and Prusa Thomas J.(2001)。“Antidumping.”。  new window
5.Keck, A.、Makashevich, B.、Ian, G.(2006)。A Probabilistic Approach to the Use of Econometric Model in Sunset Review。  new window
學位論文
1.Jione, J.(2004)。Understanding The COMPAS Model: Assumptions, Structure, and Elasticity of Substitution(博士論文)。University of Florida。  new window
圖書
1.USITC(1999)。Overview and Analysis of the Economic Impact of U.S. Sanctions With Respect to India and Pakistan。USITC Publication。  new window
2.Boltuck, R.,(1996)。“The Economic Approach to Injury Determination in Dumping and Countervailing Duty Cases: State of the Modeling Art 1996.”。Trade Resource Company。Washington D.C。  new window
3.Seth, K.,(1996)。“Injury and Causation in USITC Antidumping Determination:Five Recent Approaches, ”。Policy Implication od Anti dumping Measure。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE