:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國會議員之法地位探討--我國法與德國法的觀察與比較
書刊名:世新法學
作者:陳正根 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Cheng-ken
出版日期:2010
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁140-175
主題關鍵詞:國會議員自由代表平等代表政黨機會平等言論免責權不受逮捕權Members of CongressFree representativeEqual representativeEqual opportunities for political partiesSpeech immunityFree from being arrested
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:186
  • 點閱點閱:72
本文所探討國會議員之法地位,首先探討其角色與性質,認為其所代表的是一種自由的代表以及平等的代表,自由的代表之內涵則表現在兩方面,一為法定全體人民之之代表,其次是在自由代表下,仍受國會自律與政黨之制約。針對自由代表,我國憲法並無明文規定,可以從德國法觀察,依據德國基本法第38條第1項第2句規定:「議員為全體人民之代表,不受命令與訓令之拘束,只服從其良心。」。而本文認為最重要的概念即為國會議員乃全體國民之代表,而非某選區之代表而已,另一重點則為:自由代表的國會議員仍應在國會自律權範圍下,行使其代表的職權。又國會議員之另一種角色則是作為平等的代表,其若要成為平等的代表,則須有二方面的原則保障,一方面為選舉平等原則,透過平等選舉,符合平等代表性原則;另一方面則是在國會內的平等,亦即國會內各政黨以及議員相互間,包括無黨籍議員等,在職權上,如提案權或表決權均應平等看待。而國會議員成為自由與平等代表後,則須要憲法對國會議員之特權保障,如此才能確保延續法地位上之權利與義務,其特權主要為言論免責與不受逮捕權,此乃是現代議會民主制度保障代表國民意志之議會履行憲法所賦予任務之設計,同時亦是國會議員在法地位上重要的內涵。兩者係在保障議會內討論及表決之自由、避免議會之組成受到不法之干預以及維護議員本身之人身自由,最終之目的在防止其他國家權力或第三人利用不當手段來妨礙或破壞議會之運作,若為防止濫權而對其限制,仍應符合比例原則。
This article discusses the status of law for members of Congress. First of all, the role and nature represent freedom and equality. The representative of freedom is manifested in two aspects: one is the statutory representatives of all the people, followed by the constraints of a free, self-discipline and the Congress party. For the representative of freedom, no explicit statement is made in the local law. But according to the German Basic Law Article 38, paragraph 1, sentence 2 states, “Members are the representatives of people, not bound by orders and instructions, but subject to their conscience.” Concerning the status of law for members of Congress, the most important notion is that they represent all citizens, not just for a district. Being representatives of freedom, members of Congress should execute their rights within the self-disciplined scope of congress. Being representatives of equality, members of Congress should be protected in two ways. One is to follow the principle of equal representative through equal election; the other is equality between each political party and each member in the Congress. All members of Congress, including non-party ones, should be treated equally in the right to propose or in the right to vote. Being representatives of freedom and equality, members of Congress are protected by Constitution in their status, in order to extend their rights and obligations. Their major privileges include freedom of speech and freedom from being arrested, which are designed to endow representatives to complete their tasks in modern congress democracy and to ensure their legal status. Both are to protect the freedom to discuss and vote, to prevent the Congress being illegal intervened, and to ensure personal freedom. The ultimate goal is to prohibit interference or destroy of the operating mechanism in the Congress from the powers of other countries or the third party.
期刊論文
1.陳淑芳(19990600)。國會議事規範之規範形式。政大法學評論,61,87-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許志雄(19980800)。國會自律權。月旦法學雜誌,27,10-11。  延伸查詢new window
3.林麗真(199407)。議會之決議能力。司法周刊,681,3-5。  延伸查詢new window
4.李建良(20001000)。國會議員言論免責權之理論與實務。法令月刊,51(10),172-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李建良(19960900)。國會自律與國會議員免責權之基本概念。臺灣法學會學報,17,488-522。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳春生(19950300)。議員之言論免責與議會自律。東吳法律學報,8(2),91-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.涂懷瑩(198910)。立法委員的「地位」及其「保障」與「問題」。法律評論,55(10)=1264,2-14。  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭文生(19961000)。言論免責權與不受逮捕權。法學叢刊,41(4)=164,41-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Rinck, Hans-Justus(1961)。Die Indeinnität des Abgeordneten im Bundesstaat des Botmer Grundgesetzes。JZ。  new window
學位論文
1.薛宏欣(1997)。論司法權對議會自律事項之審查(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙義德(199506)。政黨機會平等原則之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Katz, Alfred(2005)。Staatsrecht。Heidelberg。  new window
2.林紀東(199101)。中華民國憲法釋論。大中國圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Degenhart, Christoph(1999)。Staatsorganisationsrecht。München。  new window
4.Birk, Dieter(1988)。Gleichheit im Parlament。NJW。  new window
5.Stem, Klaus(1984)。Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland。München。  new window
6.陳慈陽(200511)。憲法學。臺北:陳慈陽。  延伸查詢new window
7.許志雄、陳銘祥、蔡茂寅、周志宏、蔡宗珍、許志雄(2008)。現代憲法論。元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.李惠宗(2004)。憲法要義。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
9.許慶雄(2000)。憲法入門。臺北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.許育典(2008)。憲法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
11.許宗力(20070000)。法與國家權力。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.徐振雄(200701)。憲法學導論。高立圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.羅傳賢(200411)。國會立法技術。五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Friesenhahn, Ernst(1981)。Zur Jndenmitt der Abgeordneten in Bund und Lander。DÖV。  new window
15.Klein, in、Zeh、Schneider(1989)。Parlamentsrecht und Parlamentspraxis in der BRD。  new window
16.Munch, Kinderwahlrecht(1995)。NJW。  new window
17.Sendler(1985)。NJW。  new window
18.Stein。Staatsrecht。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳新民(199201)。國會自律權之法理初探。憲法基本權力之基本理論。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳慈陽(200703)。國會議員言論免責權相關問題初探。憲法規範性與憲政現實性。翰蘆出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Uhlitz, Otto(1962)。Die Strafverfolgung von Abgeordneten ohne Genehmigung des Parlaments。DVBI。  new window
4.Walter, Tonio(2000)。Indemnität mid Immunität (Art. 46 GG) im Überblick。Jura。  new window
5.Wilt, Olaf(2001)。Das Immunitätsrecht im Grundgesetz。Jura。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE