:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國棒鋼及線材課徵反傾銷稅落日檢討案件標準之探討
書刊名:臺灣銀行季刊
作者:黃智輝
出版日期:2010
卷期:61:3
頁次:頁119-136
主題關鍵詞:落日檢討案件標準反傾銷稅
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.黃智輝(20081000)。銅版紙課徵反傾銷稅經濟效果與國家整體利益分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,39(1),69-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Nieberding, Jame F.(1999)。The Effect of U.S. Antidumping Law on Firms 'Market Power: An Empirical Test。Review of Industrial Organization,14,65-84。  new window
3.Staiger, R. W.、Wolak, F. A.(1994)。Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States。Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics,1,51-118。  new window
4.黃智輝(20080600)。我國入會後農產品貿易救濟產業損害之模擬分析--以紅豆產業為例。農業經濟叢刊,13(2),135-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Armington, P. S.(1970)。Adjustment of trade balances: Some experiments with a model of trade among many countries。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,17(3),488-526。  new window
6.左俊德、楊秀玲(19990700)。課徵反傾銷稅對產業影響之研究。貿易調查專刊,4,87-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Shiells, C. R.、Stern, R. M.、Deardorff, A. V.(1986)。Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution between Imports and Home Goods for the United States。Weltwirtschaftliches Archive,122(3),497-519。  new window
8.黃智輝(2006)。反傾銷案件產業損害之認定態樣。台銀季刊,56(2),145-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Krupp, Corinne M.、Skeath, Susan(2002)。Evidence on the Upstream and Downstream Impacts of Antidumping Cases。North America Journal of Economics and Finance,13(2),163-178。  new window
10.林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽、溫偉任、陳建維、陳財家(20020900)。反傾銷制度產業損害經濟分析--美國鋼鐵與高科技產業案例研究。貿易調查專刊,8,271-314。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Armington, Paul S.(1969)。The Geographic Pattern of Trade and the Effects of Price changes。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),176-199。  new window
12.Armington, P. S.(1969)。A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production。International Monetary Fund Staff Papers,16(1),159-178。  new window
13.Kelly, K. M.、Morkre, M. E.(1998)。Do Unfairly Traded Imports Injure Domestic Industries?。Review of International Economics,6(2),321-332。  new window
14.黃智輝(20080300)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析--臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,38(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.黃智輝(20000100)。反傾銷稅的經濟福利效益分析。臺灣經濟金融月刊,36(1)=420,66-83。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃智輝(20031200)。反傾銷案件產業損害調查經濟效益實證分析--我國案例探討。臺灣銀行季刊,54(4),216-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Said, S. E.、Dickey, D. A.(1985)。Hypothesis Testing in ARIMA Models。Journal of the American Statistical Association,80,369-374。  new window
18.李成(20020900)。世界貿易組織「泰國對波蘭進口H型鋼課徵反傾銷稅案」。貿易調查專刊,8,67-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.林仁光(2003)。世貿易組織『美國對韓進口之不鏽鋼皮捲及不鏽鋼成捲帶採行反傾銷措施案』之研究。經濟部貿易調查專刊,8。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃智輝(2007)。進口救濟案件調查認定態樣之探討。臺灣銀行臺灣經濟金融月刊,42(1)。  延伸查詢new window
21.黃智輝(2007)。進口救濟案件調查認定態樣之探討。臺灣銀行臺灣經濟金融月刊,42(2)。  延伸查詢new window
22.黃智輝(20060600)。臺灣農產品救助政策與進品救濟制度運用之效益分析。農業經濟叢刊,11(2),309-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Bown, C. P.、Crowley, M. A.(2007)。Trade Deflection and Trade Depression。Journal of International Economics,72,176-201。  new window
24.Durling, J. P.、Prusa, T. J.(2006)。The Trade Effects Associated with an Antidumping Epidemic: The Hot-rolled Steel Market, 1996-2001X。European Journal of Political Economy,22,675-695。  new window
25.黃智輝(2006)。反傾銷案件產業損害之認定態樣。台銀季刊,56(1),215-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Krupp, C.、Pollard, Patrica S.(1996)。Market Responses to Antidumping Law: Some Evidence from US Chemical Industry。Canadian Journal of Economics,29,199-227。  new window
研究報告
1.Eichengreen, B. J.、Der Ven, H. Van(1983)。U.S. Antidumping Policies: The Case of Steel。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
2.Prusa, T. J.(1999)。On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
3.Knetter, Michael M.、Prusa, Thomas J.(2000)。Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries。Washington, DC:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
4.(1989)。經濟部統計處工業生產統計月報。  延伸查詢new window
5.Prusa, T. J.(1996)。The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions。Washington, D.C.:National Bureau of Economic Research。  new window
學位論文
1.李書全(2003)。台灣鋼鐵產業H型鋼材之反傾銷個案研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳星宇(20010700)。反傾銷制度產業保護效果之研究--以DRAM個案為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱俊儀(2005)。反傾銷調查立案與裁定成立之影響因素--WTO會員國1990-2004案例實證分析(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳玉麟(2001)。台灣鋼鐵產業網絡--不鏽鋼之生產與行銷策略(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.李淑媛(2006)。反傾銷案件產業損害認定經濟分析模型之研究-台灣型鋼產業之應用(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.USITC(1995)。The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order and Suspension Agreements。Washington, D.C.:U.S. International Trade Commission。  new window
2.Francois, J. F.、Hall, H. K.(1993)。COMPAS: Commercial Policy Analysis System。Washington, D. C.:U. S. International Trade Commission。  new window
3.黃智輝(2001)。貿易救濟防火牆進口救濟與世界貿易組織--台灣產業結構調整策略。台商圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.World Trade Organization(1995)。Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations-Agreement on Agriculture。  new window
5.Francois, J. F.、Reinert, K. A.(1997)。Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Reinert, Kenneth A.、Shiells, Clinton R.(1992)。Estimated Elasticities of Substitution for Analysis of a North American Free Trade Area。Washington, D.C.:USITC, Office of Economics。  new window
7.Dinardo, J.、Johnston, J.(1996)。Econometric methods。McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.黃得晉、經濟部技術處(2006)。2006鋼鐵年鑑--棒線類鋼材篇。  延伸查詢new window
9.臺灣鋼鐵2006。臺灣區鋼鐵工業同業公會。  延伸查詢new window
10.(2005)。臺灣地區鋼品需求預測。臺灣地區鋼鐵工業同業公會。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1989)。鋼鐵資訊。鋼鐵公會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top