:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:平衡計分卡於審計機關績效評估之設計
書刊名:會計學報
作者:詹乾隆 引用關係吳麗雲
作者(外文):Jan, Chyan-longWu, Li-yun
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁85-112
主題關鍵詞:平衡計分卡績效評估政府審計Balanced scorecardPerformance evaluationGovernment audit
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:90
本研究以平衡計分卡為理論基礎,將政府審計機關使命、願景及核心價值與平衡計分卡四大構面及績效指標連結,建構審計機關策略地圖;研究過程除蒐集國內外平衡計分卡及績效評估之文獻案例、總決算審核報告、審計法規及媒體網站等資訊外,並對審計部及所屬審計處、室現任政府審計人員進行問卷調查、深度訪談;根據實證分析結果,本研究訂出8項策略性目標及20項績效評估指標。 本研究結論及建議如下:五成之政府審計人員認同審計機關實施績效評估制度是可行的,其中擔任主管職務者之認同程度,高於未擔任主管職之政府審計人員,且達顯著水準。政府審計人員對於平衡計分卡四大構面績效指標之認同程度,以「學習與成長」構面得分最高,以「顧客」構面得分最低。綜上,顯示政府審計人員對於審計績效評估與顧客服務等觀念有待加強及宣導。此外,建議改善「內部流程」構面,充分利用網路平台資源共享之機制,提供現有稽察成果統計資料予績效考核者及管理單位擷取運用,俾免耗費人力資源重複建置。
This research based on balance scorecard, collecting relevant auditing documents, regulations and information to design the questionnaire, and takes interviews with the government auditors. The study transforms the organization’s mission and vision into strategy objectives, performance evaluation indicators and strategy map. Through literature review and statistical analysis, we obtain 8 strategy objectives and 20 performance evaluation indicators. The results of the research are as follows: There is a significant difference about 50 percent of management level more approve of the performance evaluation system than the staff in the government audit agencies.For the entire performance evaluation indicators in balance scorecard’s perspectives, learning and growth aspect has the highest average score, customer aspect has the lowest average score. Therefore, it’s necessary to enhance the concept of customer service.Through the internet and the audit department’s internal process being improved, there are much information being supplied to managers and performance examiners for reference. It will avoid of the duplication of efforts and human resources.
期刊論文
1.Wise, I. R.(1997)。The Balanced Scorecard Approach to Strategy Management。The Public Manager,26(3),47-50。  new window
2.Corrigan, J.(1996)。The balanced scorecard: The new approach to performance measurement。Australian Accountant,66(7),47-48。  new window
3.李允傑(19991000)。公部門之績效評估。人事月刊,29(4)=170,4-9+11+13-14。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy。California Management Review,39(1),53-79。  new window
5.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system。Harvard Business Review,74(1),75-85。  new window
6.周靜幸(2004)。四個央格魯薩克遜國家最高審計機關績效評估:最佳範例(下)。東信男著,25(1),50-77。  延伸查詢new window
7.周靜幸、東信男(2004)。四個央格魯薩克遜國家最高審計機關績效評估:最佳範例 (上)。審計季刊,24(4),51-65。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳安妮(2001)。公務機關實施平衡計分卡及績效評估及管理制度之探討:以主計處會計作業小組為對象。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃同圳(2000)。績效評估與管理。人力資源管理的十二堂課。臺北市:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
2.Niven, P. R.(2003)。Balanced Scorecard Step-by-step: For Government and Nonprofit Agencies。New York, NY:Hoboken, New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
3.吳安妮(2004)。平衡計分卡在公務機關實施之探討,政府績效評估。台北:行政院研考會。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。行政院所屬各機關施政績效管理作業手冊。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE