:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:圖書館電子資源投資報酬率評量研究:以南台科技大學為例
書刊名:大學圖書館
作者:李勅毅陳昭珍 引用關係楊智晶
作者(外文):Lee, Chih-yiChen, Chao-chenYang, Chih-ching Emily
出版日期:2010
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁174-188
主題關鍵詞:電子資源假設市場評估法經濟價值願付價格投資報酬Electronic resourceContingent Valuation MethodEconomic valueWillingness to payReturn on investment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
電子資源對大學圖書館使用者是最直接便捷的資訊取用途徑,且認為是圖書館應提供的重要服務。然而電子資源價格昂貴,大學經費日益緊縮,在有限的資源下,只依據使用者需求之概念性價值認定,圖書館難以在母機構爭取合理的經費訂購電子資源。若能分析電子資源的成本效益,證明其可為研究者及校方創造實際的價值,將有助於圖書館在經費預算上的爭取。本研究以南台科技大學圖書館為例,利用三種評估方法計算大學圖書館在電子資源的成本效益:一是利用假設市場評估法,調查讀者對於電子資源的願付價格以計算其投資報酬率;其二,參考MLA 圖書館服務價值計算方式,以館際合作之文獻傳遞價格計算讀者使用電子資源的收益以求得投資報酬率;第三是參考伊利諾大學所提出的計算方法,以研究者使用圖書館電子資源撰寫研究計畫而獲得校外研究補助案的實質效益。研究結果發現,上述3種評估方法的結果均顯示,南台科技大學圖書館在電子資源的投入成本可獲得正面的經濟效益。
Searching databases and subscriptions available online has proven to be the most expedient means for library users to acquire information needed. The library arguably bears such a mission to make available as much information online as possible. However, the cost for a library to upgrade and expand their e-services seems to be rather high, amidst school’s limited budget. Relevant ROI studies would apparently be needed to help validate the spending on a library’s online digital services. This research conducts the following three ROI assessments to investigate the case relating to Southern Taiwan University Library. First, using a contingent valuation method, a survey done to determine the ROI based on the fees users are willing to pay for e-services. Second, in reference to the service value calculator the Massachusetts Library Association uses, ROI is done based on inter-library loans and usage. Third, using the model of University of Illinois’s study in which e-resources has been proven effective for proposals to secure outside funding, ROI case in point is positive. The conclusion shows the positive economic value for Southern Taiwan University Library to invest on e-resources.
期刊論文
1.任紅娟(2008)。高校圓書館電子資源成本效益分析構成要素略論。圖書館論與實踐,6,101-103。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hu, R. H.(2002)。ROI can validate your library value。AALL Spectrum Magazine,7(2),20-27。  new window
3.Missingham, R(2005)。Libraries and economic value: a review of recent studies.Performance。Measurement and Metrics,6(3),142-158。  new window
4.Montgomery, C. H(2002)。Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections: a first step towards a comprehensive analysis。D-Lib Magazine,8(10)。  new window
5.Noonan, D. S.(2004)。Valuing arts and culture: a research agenda for contingent valuation。Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society,34(3),1063-2921。  new window
6.Saracevic, T.(2000)。Digital library evaluation: toward an evolution of concepts。Library Trends,49(2),350-369。  new window
7.李明聰、甘志展(20070900)。國家公園遊客對綠建築旅館之願付價格研究--以墾丁國家公園為例。中華建築學刊,3(2),1-13。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳佩君(2008)。圖書館經濟價值之探討--以台北市立圖書館為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Steffen, N、Lietzau, Z、Lance, K. C、Rybin, A(2009)。Public libraries- a wise investment: a return on investment study of Colorado libraries。Denver:Library Research Services。  new window
其他
1.Holmstrom, J(2004)。The return on investment of electronic journals -it is a matter of time,http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ april04/holmstrom/04holmstrom.html。  new window
2.Luther, J(2008)。University investment in the library: what’s the return?,http: //libraryconnect.elsevier.com/ whitepapers/0108/lcwp010801. html。  new window
3.Massachusetts Library Association(2008)。MLA value of library service calculator.,http://www.masslib.org/value-new/calculator.html。  new window
4.Rusch(1999)。Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals,http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE