:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國專利法上「具有通常技術者」之探討
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:謝祖松 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Tsu-sung
出版日期:2010
卷期:76
頁次:頁43-94
主題關鍵詞:具有通常知識者進步性致能要求合理人後見之明KSRPHOSITANonobviousnessEnablementReasonable personHindsight
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:114
期刊論文
1.Smith, Steven P.,、Kurt R. Van Thomme(2007)。Bridge Over Troubled Water: The Supreme Court’s New Patent Obviousness Standard in KSR Should Be Readily Apparent and Benefit the Public。ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH.,17,127。  new window
2.謝祖松(20040500)。新穎性之理論與實務--評析最高行政法院九十二年判字第六九八號判決。世新法學,1,43-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Davis, Michael H.(2004)。Patent Politics。South Carolina Law Review,56(2),337-378。  new window
4.謝祖松(20030300)。從專利調和化的觀點評析我國新修專利法可專利性要件之規範。臺灣本土法學雜誌,44,19-38。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂紹凡(2007)。組合發明之非顯而易見性-2007 年 KSR v. Teleflex 判決簡介。萬國法律,第 153 期。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂紹凡(2008)。非顯而易見性於 KSR 判決後之實務發展-藥物專利實例探討。萬國法律,162。  延伸查詢new window
7.董安丹(2004)。非顯著性之理論與實用。世新法學,創刊號。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fromer, Jeanne C.(2008)。The Layers of Obviousness in Patent Law。HARV. J. LAW & TEC,22,75-101。  new window
9.Gilles, Stephen G.(1994)。The Invisible Hand Formula。VA. L. REV.,80,1015。  new window
10.Gilles, Stephen G.(2004)。On Determining Negligence: Hand Formula Balancing, the Reasonable Person Standard, and the Jury。VAND. L. REV.,54,813。  new window
11.Heymann, Laura A.(2008)。The Reasonable Person in Trademark Law。ST. LOUIS L. J.,52,781。  new window
12.Homma, Tomotaka(2008)。Comparing Japanese and U.S. Standards of Obviousness: Providing Meaningful Guidance After KSR。IDEA,48,449。  new window
13.Hornle, Tatjana(2008)。Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The “Reasonable Person” in a Comparative Perspective。NEW CRIM. L. R.,11,1。  new window
14..Mandel, Gregory N.(2006)。Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration that the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational。OHIO ST. L.J.,67,1391。  new window
15.Mandel, Gregory N.(2006)。Patently Non-obvious II: Experimental Study on The Hindsight Issue Before The Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex。YALE J. L. & TECH.,9,1。  new window
16.Meara, Joseph P.(2002)。Just Who Is The Person Having Ordinary Skill In The Art? Patent Law's Mysterious Personage。WASH. L. REV.,77,267。  new window
17.Miller, Joseph Scott(2008)。Remixing Obviousness。TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J.,16,237-256。  new window
18.Schwartz, Warren F.(1989)。Objective and Subjective Standards of Negligence: Defining the Reasonable Person to Induce Optimal Care and Optimal Populations of Injurers and Victims。GEO. L.J.,78,241。  new window
19.Tresansky, John O.(1991)。PHOSITA-The Ubiquitous and Enigmatic Person in Patent Law。J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC’Y,73,37, 50。  new window
20.Wagner, R. Polk、Strandburg, Katherine J.(2007)。The Obviousness Requirement in the Patent Law。U. PA. L. REV. PENNUMBRA,155,96。  new window
圖書
1.盧文祥(2006)。智慧財產權不確定法律概念的剖析研究。瑞興圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭中人(2009)。專利法規釋義。臺北:考用出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊崇森(2007)。專利法理論與運用。台北:三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡明誠(19980000)。發明專利法研究。臺北:蔡明誠。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉國讚(2009)。專利實務論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.王澤鑑(2009)。侵權行為法。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾陳明汝原著、蔡明誠續著(2009)。兩岸暨歐美專利法。曾與陳同道堂法學文集。  延伸查詢new window
8.CHISUM, DONALD S.(2009)。2-5 CHISUM ON PATENTS § 5.04。  new window
9.HARMON, R. L.(1990)。PATENTS AND THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 5.2(c)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE