期刊論文| 1. | Smith, Steven P.,、Kurt R. Van Thomme(2007)。Bridge Over Troubled Water: The Supreme Court’s New Patent Obviousness Standard in KSR Should Be Readily Apparent and Benefit the Public。ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH.，17，127。   |
| 2. | 謝祖松(20040500)。新穎性之理論與實務--評析最高行政法院九十二年判字第六九八號判決。世新法學，1，43-82。 延伸查詢 |
| 3. | Davis, Michael H.(2004)。Patent Politics。South Carolina Law Review，56(2)，337-378。 |
| 4. | 謝祖松(20030300)。從專利調和化的觀點評析我國新修專利法可專利性要件之規範。臺灣本土法學雜誌，44，19-38。 延伸查詢 |
| 5. | 呂紹凡(2007)。組合發明之非顯而易見性－2007 年 KSR v. Teleflex 判決簡介。萬國法律，第 153 期。 延伸查詢 |
| 6. | 呂紹凡(2008)。非顯而易見性於 KSR 判決後之實務發展－藥物專利實例探討。萬國法律，162。 延伸查詢 |
| 7. | 董安丹(2004)。非顯著性之理論與實用。世新法學，創刊號。 延伸查詢 |
| 8. | Fromer, Jeanne C.(2008)。The Layers of Obviousness in Patent Law。HARV. J. LAW & TEC，22，75-101。 |
| 9. | Gilles, Stephen G.(1994)。The Invisible Hand Formula。VA. L. REV.，80，1015。 |
| 10. | Gilles, Stephen G.(2004)。On Determining Negligence: Hand Formula Balancing, the Reasonable Person Standard, and the Jury。VAND. L. REV.，54，813。 |
| 11. | Heymann, Laura A.(2008)。The Reasonable Person in Trademark Law。ST. LOUIS L. J.，52，781。 |
| 12. | Homma, Tomotaka(2008)。Comparing Japanese and U.S. Standards of Obviousness: Providing Meaningful Guidance After KSR。IDEA，48，449。 |
| 13. | Hornle, Tatjana(2008)。Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: The “Reasonable Person” in a Comparative Perspective。NEW CRIM. L. R.，11，1。 |
| 14. | .Mandel, Gregory N.(2006)。Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration that the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational。OHIO ST. L.J.，67，1391。 |
| 15. | Mandel, Gregory N.(2006)。Patently Non-obvious II: Experimental Study on The Hindsight Issue Before The Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex。YALE J. L. & TECH.，9，1。 |
| 16. | Meara, Joseph P.(2002)。Just Who Is The Person Having Ordinary Skill In The Art? Patent Law's Mysterious Personage。WASH. L. REV.，77，267。 |
| 17. | Miller, Joseph Scott(2008)。Remixing Obviousness。TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J.，16，237-256。 |
| 18. | Schwartz, Warren F.(1989)。Objective and Subjective Standards of Negligence: Defining the Reasonable Person to Induce Optimal Care and Optimal Populations of Injurers and Victims。GEO. L.J.，78，241。 |
| 19. | Tresansky, John O.(1991)。PHOSITA－The Ubiquitous and Enigmatic Person in Patent Law。J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC’Y，73，37, 50。 |
| 20. | Wagner, R. Polk、Strandburg, Katherine J.(2007)。The Obviousness Requirement in the Patent Law。U. PA. L. REV. PENNUMBRA，155。 |