:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育課中教師獲知學生學習經驗之方法論述
書刊名:大專體育
作者:邱逸翔 引用關係廖莉安林明佳
作者(外文):Chiu, Yi-hsiangLiao, Li-anLin, Ming-chia
出版日期:2010
卷期:111
頁次:頁17-24
主題關鍵詞:學習經驗半結構式訪談焦點團體Learning experienceSemi-structured interviewsFocus groups interview
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:197
在體育課中,當學生達到體育教師所給予的目標後,並不表示學生真的擁有足夠的體育認知,這認知可能包含情意、技能、體育相關知識。然而,學生的學習過程中,我們很少知道學生是如何理解課程或技能中的學習情況,故本文以國內外相關運動教育理論與文獻為基礎,分別探究現今體育課程中,如何有效了解學生在學習過程的經驗、看法以及想法,進而提供體育教師能做有效的體育教學。其有效方法有三:(一)以半結構式訪談法(semistructured interviews)來了解學生個人對體育課的學習活動的想法,單一使用此方法,學生的回答太過簡短,且沒有回答更深入的想法;(二)畫、說與寫(draw, talk and write)來引出學生對於體育課的想法和意見,在此方法中,學生表達出情意與認知方面的結果很少;(三)藉由焦點團體訪談方式(focus groups)要求學生分享自己的學習經驗,以致從中獲得特定的資訊,但學生的回答有可能會因為太多人在場,而不敢回答他心中真正的答案。但綜合以上三種方式的運用,能有效提供學生的學習經驗。
In physical education, students couldn't learn enough knowledge even they completed physical education during school education. The knowledge includes affective, skill and cognitive domains of physical education. However, it is hard to understand how students learn during a PE class. Therefore, this paper was better to understand how learn experience and opinions impact through students’ learning processes in physical education in recent time. That helps physical education teachers improve their effective teaching. The methods of three instrument for effectiveness was a semi-structured interviews, which could understand how a student think about learning in physical education, students could answer the questions, but couldn't express their concepts specifically. Drawing, talking, and writing could guild the students for physical education concepts and viewpoints. In this way, students expressed the results of affective and cognitive aspects of small. And focus groups interviews asked students to share their learning experiences, which derived specific information, but the student's answer may be because too many people around and not answer the real answer in his mind. However, the use of the above three methods, can provide students with the learning experience.
期刊論文
1.張世忠(20031200)。從建構取向觀點探討一門非同步教學課程之行動研究。中原學報,31(4),391-402。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊筱玉、傅敏芳、林怡倩(20080300)。建構式英語教學之研究。美和技術學院學報,27(1),83-101。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐秀慧(20091100)。論文字與圖畫在傳播媒體中的分合。大葉大學通識教育學報,4,27-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Koekoek, J.、Knoppers, A.、Stegeman, H.(2009)。How do children think they learn skills in Physical Education ?。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,28,310-332。  new window
5.Morgan, D. L.(1996)。Focus groups。Annual Review of Sociology,22(1),129-152。  new window
6.von Glasersfeld, Ernst(1989)。Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching。Synthese,80(1),121-140。  new window
7.Cobb, P.(1988)。The Tension between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education。Educational Psychologist,23(2),87-103。  new window
8.李文田(19960900)。體育課程的設計模式與價值取向。臺灣省學校體育,6(5)=35,42-48。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bodner, George M.(1986)。Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge。Journal of Chemical Education,63(10),873-878。  new window
會議論文
1.許義雄(1984)。大專學生的體育目標認同傾向。七十三年度大專院校體育研討會。臺北市:中華民國大專院校體育總會。257-292。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李淑芬(2008)。創意畫圖引導提早寫作教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳志強(2006)。建構臺北市國小高年級學童理想中的資訊環境─以臺北市忠義國民小學為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂 玉 琴。國小六年級學生對教師數學教學評量的知覺(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉宏鈺(2003)。雙生涯家庭女性繼續學習歷程與經驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇錦祥(2009)。同儕互評應用於理解式球類教學之行動研究--以國小六年級合球教學為例(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.王春堎(1999)。彰化縣國小教師對體育課程價值取向暨課程決定之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園市。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘義祥(1998)。國小教師體育教學目標與教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.闕月清(2003)。體育教師回饋的迷思。運動文化與運動教育。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Carey, M. A.(1994)。The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research。Critical issues in qualitative research methods。London::Sage。  new window
3.Dyson, B.(2006)。Students’ perspectives of physical education。The handbook of physical education。London:Sage。  new window
4.黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘淑滿(2008)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Ministry of Education(2009)。國民中小學九年一貫課程與教學網站,http://teach.eje.edu.tw/, 20090921。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rovegno, I.、Dolly, J. P.(2006)。Constructivist perspectives on learning。The handbook of physical education。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE