:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:認知成份依據的電腦化圖形推理測驗發展
書刊名:數位學習科技期刊
作者:張世強洪碧霞 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Shih-chiangHung, Pi-hsia
出版日期:2010
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁78-92
主題關鍵詞:試題難度電腦化測驗圖形推理認知成份分析診斷測驗Item difficultyComputerized testFigure reasoningCognitive component analysisdiagnosis assessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:20
本研究的目的在利用電腦多媒體的優勢及認知成份分析的明確架構,發展電腦化圖形推理測驗(The Computerized Figure Reasoning Test, CFRT),實徵驗證認知成份架構對測驗效度論述的重要支持意涵。研究中採用八項成份進行CFRT 作業的發展,針對國小五、六年級共498 名學生進行施測,實徵檢驗認知 成份對作業難度的解釋力。研究中操作性界定認知成份的內涵與編碼方式,以多元迴歸進行資料分析,結果顯示八項認知成份模式對實際難度參數的解釋量約為90%,充分顯示認知成份分析對於試題難度來源解釋與操弄的應用潛力。 本研究所提出的圖形推理認知成份架構,可作為未來圖形推理作業自動化產出的基礎,降低電腦化圖形推理題庫資源發展的成本,進一步提高圖形推理能力診斷與介入應用的可能。
The purpose of this study is to propose an eight-component-model to develop a computerized figure reasoning test (CFRT). The components included are distribution of three values rule, distribution of two values rule, constant in column/raw rule, quantitative pairwise progression rule, figure addition or subtraction rule, figure movement or rotation rule, perceptual identification, rule explicitness. The CFRT was administered to 498 5th and 6th graders. The results suggest that the cognitive components included can predict around 90% variances of the difficulty parameters. The cognitive component based test development approach is successfully implemented in this study. The approach demonstrates it’s direct and strong support for construct validity. The eight components investigated in this study might also serve as the basis for further compensatory intervention for students with low figure reasoning ability.
期刊論文
1.洪碧霞、蕭嘉偉、楊佩馨(20081200)。從認知負荷觀點分析國小二至四年級數與計算成就測驗。教育研究與發展期刊,4(4),151-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Embretson, S. E.、Gorin, J.(2001)。Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles。Journal of Educational Measurement,38(4),343-368。  new window
3.涂金堂(19990700)。簡介「國民中小學學生推理能力測驗」及其應用。學生輔導,63,24-33。  延伸查詢new window
4.Freund, P. A.、Hofer, S.、Holling, H.(2008)。Explaining and controlling for the psychometric properties of computer-generated figural matrix items。Applied Psychological Measurement,32(3),195-210。  new window
5.Carpenter, P. A.、Just, M. A.、Shell, P.(1990)。What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test。Psychological Review,97(3),404-431。  new window
6.DeShon, R. P.、Chan, D.、Weissbein, D. A.(1995)。Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: evidence for multidimensional performance determinants。Intelligence,21,135-155。  new window
7.Meo, M.、Roberts, M. J.、Marucci, F. S.(2007)。Element salience as a predictor of item difficulty for Raven's Progressive Matrices。Intelligence,35,359-368。  new window
8.Primi, R.(2001)。Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks, Contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence。Intelligence,30,41-70。  new window
9.Vigneau, F.、Bors, D. A.(2008)。The quest for item types based on information processing: An analysis of Rave's Advanced Progressive Matrices, with a consideration of gender differences。Intelligence,36(6),702-710。  new window
10.Embretson, S. E.(1998)。A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to Abstract Reasoning。Psychological Method,3(3),380-396。  new window
11.Gorin, J. S.(2006)。Test design with cognition in mind。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,25(4),21-35。  new window
12.Mulholland, T. M.、Pellegrino, J. W.、Glaser, R.(1980)。Components of geometric analogy solution。Cognitive Psychology,12,252-284。  new window
13.Nichols, P. D.(1994)。A Framework for Developing Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment。Review of Educational Research,64(4),575-603。  new window
14.洪碧霞、林素微、林娟如(20061200)。認知複雜度分析架構對TASA-MAT六年級線上測驗試題難度的解釋力。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),69-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Kaput, J.(1998)。Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by “algebrafying” the k-12 curriculum。Washington, DC:National Research Council, National Academy Press。25-26。  new window
研究報告
1.洪碧霞(2005)。國小學生數學學習潛力動態評量模式的發展與應用:數學學習潛力、工作記憶、與數學表現關係之縱貫探討 (計畫編號:NSC-93-2521-S-024-001)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉子鍵(2000)。認知測量在APM和新編圖形推理能力測驗效度化上的驗證研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張世強(2009)。電腦化圖形推理測驗效度議題之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李東霖(2001)。國小三年級學生工作記憶與數學學習關係之探討(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳亮君(2006)。國中小學生數學胚騰覺察能力發展概況之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.熊斌、張靜雅、周潔嬰(2001)。小學數學圖形問題。台北:九章。  延伸查詢new window
2.Van de Walle, John A.、張英傑、周菊美(2005)。中小學數學科教材教法。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.曹亮吉(2003)。阿草的數學聖杯。台北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000)。Principles and standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hunt, E.(1974)。Quote the Raven? Nevermore!。Knowledge and cognition。Potomac, MD:Erlbaum。  new window
2.Embretson, S. E.(1994)。Applications of cognitive design systems to test development。Cognitive assessment: a multidisciplinary perspective。New York, NY:Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE