資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.57.251)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
科學教育有助於消除迷信嗎?--從思考統整層面所做的觀察
書刊名:
教育心理學報
作者:
王震武
/
林文瑛
/
張郁雯
作者(外文):
Wang, Jennwu
/
Lin, Wenying
/
Chang, Yuwen
出版日期:
2011
卷期:
42:3
頁次:
頁467-490
主題關鍵詞:
局部統整
;
科學式思考
;
科學教育
;
迷信式思考
;
整體統整
;
Global coherence
;
Local coherence
;
Science education
;
Scientific thinking
;
Superstitious thinking
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
3
點閱:29
本研究的目的在釐清科學教育與思考統整性的發展之關係。假如科學教育使人趨於理性,則隨著科學教育年限的增長,迷信式思考便會逐步削弱,而思考的統整性則會越來越強,這也是科學教育有助於破除迷信的真正意涵。本研究針對小、中、大學生,以三個實驗分別去釐清他們對命相、風水、鬼神三類議題的思考之統整程度。每個實驗呈現兩個故事,每個故事均包含一個關於命相/風水/鬼神的說法,但兩故事的說法是彼此矛盾的。參與者須以五點量表表示他對每個說法的接受度。三個實驗結果非常類似,不論是關於命相、風水或鬼神議題的思考,隨著受教育年限的增長,參與者對這些說法的接受度趨於下降。然而,參與者對兩個矛盾說法的反應相關係數卻顯示,參與者的思考是局部統整的,而且此局部統整現象遍通於命相、風水與鬼神類議題的思考,並隨教育年限的增長而趨於明顯。換句話說,偏重科學知識的科學教育,除了明顯增進受教育者懷疑精神外,在思考上,並未能成功的教導最重要的科學理性-思考統整。
以文找文
The main purpose of this study was to understand the relationship between science education and development of global coherence in thinking. To devise successful science education, it is necessary to consider both scientific knowledge and scientific thinking. The crucial point of scientific thinking is to achieve global coherence in thinking instead of local coherence which involves conflicts in thinking. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of science education on diluting superstitious thinking in terms of local coherence in thinking. Three experiments were designed to investigate the coherence in thinking of elementary school, middle/high school, and college students in the fields of physiognomy, supernaturalism, and geomancy, respectively. In each experiment, two stories depicting the same unusual events with conflicting paranormal explanations were presented. The participants were asked to rate their acceptance of each explanation in a five point scale. Similar results were found in the three experiments: (1) Participants' acceptance of paranormal explanations decreases with age; (2) However, the correlation between participants' two responses to the two conflicting explanations suggests local coherence in participants' thinking. And such local coherence in thinking increases with age. In other words, science education with focus on science knowledge has not successfully taught student global coherence in thinking, which is the most important part of science reasoning.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Tetlock, Philip E.(2002)。Social Functionalist Frameworks for Judgment and Choice: Intuitive Politicians, Theologians, and Prosecutors。Psychological Review,109(3),451-471。
2.
Kuhn, D.(1989)。Children and adults as intuitive scientists。Psychological Review,96(4),674-689。
3.
Lipman, Matthew(1976)。Philosophy for children。Metaphilosophy,7(1),17-39。
4.
Flavell, J. H.(1999)。Cognitive Development: children's knowledge about the mind。Annual Review of Psychology,50,21-45。
5.
王震武、林文瑛(20050300)。迷信思考中的解釋效果。中華心理學刊,47(1),39-60。
延伸查詢
6.
Gergely, G.、Csibra, G.(2003)。Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7,287-292。
7.
Wang, J. W.、Cheng, C. M.、Lin, W. Y.(2010)。Thinking biases in searching for explanation: Plausibility bias and local coherence。Journal of Psychology,1,31-37。
8.
Ybarra, O.(2002)。Naive causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing。Psychological Bulletin,128,421-441。
圖書
1.
Piaget, Jean、Cook, M.(1954)。The Construction of Reality in the Child。New York:Basic Books。
2.
Inhelder, B.、Piaget, Jean、Parsons, Anne、Milgram, Stanley(1958)。The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence。Basic Books。
3.
Piaget, J.、Cook, M.(1952)。The origins of intelligence in children。New York, NY:W. W. Norton and Company。
4.
Piaget, Jean、Piercy, M.、Berlyne, D. E.(1950)。The Psychology of Intelligence。Routledge and Kegan Paul。
5.
Feuerstein, R.(1980)。Instrumental enrichment: an intervention program for cognitive modifiability。Baltimore, MD:University Park Press。
6.
Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.、Weaver, H.(1969)。The Psychology of the Child。New York, NY:Basic Book。
7.
Adams, M. J.(1986)。Odyssey: A curriculum for thinking。MA, US。
8.
Burke, T.(1971)。Intuitive Math。CT, USA。
9.
de Bono, E.(1973)。CoRT thinking program: Workcards and teacher notes。Sydney。
10.
Lipman, M.(1983)。Thinking skills forstered by philosophy for children。NJ, US。
11.
Wellman, H. M.、Hickling, A. K.、Schult, C. A.(1997)。Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations。The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena。CA, US。
12.
Ritchhart, R.、Perkins, D. N.(2005)。Learning to thinking: The challenges of teaching thinking。The cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning。New York, US。
圖書論文
1.
Piaget, J.(1970)。Piaget’s theory。Carmichael’s manual of child psychology。New York:Wiley。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從局部統合到整體統合的發展--以道德思考為例
2.
我如何知道我關心什麼?--不同背景大學生的自身技術之分析
3.
迷信思考中的解釋效果
1.
國小高年級學童、家長對教師專業之信任與學業成就關係之研究
1.
Religious Experience: In contemporary Taiwan and China
2.
正向心理情意:教與學
無相關著作
1.
闢妄醒迷:明清之際的天主教與「迷信」之建構
2.
「迷信」觀念於清末民初之變遷
QR Code