:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國專利法非顯而易知性之新觀點:相同條件下的客觀指標
書刊名:科技法學評論
作者:劉懿嫻
作者(外文):Liu, Yi-hsien
出版日期:2010
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁181-219
主題關鍵詞:進步性顯而易知後見偏差相乘效果標準TSM法則顯可嘗試法則輔助性判斷因素實證研究ObviousnessHindsight biasSynergy testTSM testObvious-to-TrySecondary considerationPatentEmpirical study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
期刊論文
1.Smith, Steven P.,、Kurt R. Van Thomme(2007)。Bridge Over Troubled Water: The Supreme Court’s New Patent Obviousness Standard in KSR Should Be Readily Apparent and Benefit the Public。ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH.,17,127。  new window
2.Cottrell, Clara R.(2007)。The Supreme Court Brings a Sea Change with KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc.。WAKE FOREST L. REV.,42,595。  new window
3.Burk, Dan L.、Lemley, Mark A.(2002)。Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,17,1155-1167。  new window
4.Burk, Dan L.、Lemley, Mark A.(2003)。Policy Levers in Patent Law。Virginia Law Review,89(7),1575-1696。  new window
5.Merges, Robert Patrick(1988)。Commercial Success and Patent Standards: Economic Perspectives on Innovation。California Law Review,76(4),803-876。  new window
6.Allison, John R.,、Mark A. Lemley(1998)。Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents。AIPLA Q.J.,26,185。  new window
7.Benjamin, Stuart Minor,、Arti Rai(2007)。Who’s Afraid of the APA? What the Patent System Can Learn from Administrative Law。GEO. L. J.,95,269。  new window
8.Chiang, Tun-Jen(2008)。A Cost-benefit Approach to Patent Obviousness。ST. JOHN’S L. REV.,82,39。  new window
9.Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper(2008)。Nonobviousness: A Comment on Three Learned Papers。LEWIS & CLARK L. REV.,12,431。  new window
10.Duffy, John F.(2008)。A Timing Approach to Patentability。LEWIS & CLARK L. REV.,12,343-374。  new window
11.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(2004)。Obvious to Whom? Evaluating Inventions from the Perspective of PHO-SITA。BERKELEY TECH. L. J.,19,885-906。  new window
12.Lake, Kevin J.(1983)。Synergism and Nonobviousness: The Rhetorical Rubik’s Cube of Patentability。B. C. L. REV.,24,697。  new window
13.Mandel, Gregory(2007)。Patently Non-Obvious II: Experimental Study on the Hindsight Issue Before the Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex。YALE J. L. & TECH.,9,1。  new window
14.Mandel, Gregory(2008)。The Non-obvious Problem: How the Indeterminate Nonobviousness Standard Produces Excessive Patent Grants。U.C. DAVIS L. REV.,42,57-128。  new window
15.McGuire, Joshua(2003)。Nonobviousness: Limitations on Evidentiary Support。BERKELEY TECH. L. J.,18,175。  new window
16.Packin, Tamir(2006)。A New Test for Obviousness in Combination Patents: Economic Synergy。CARDOZO L. REV.,28,957。  new window
17.Rich, Giles S.(1960)。The Principles of Patentability。J. PAT. OFF. SOC’Y,42,75。  new window
18.Rich, Giles S.(2004)。Laying the Ghost of the “Invention” Requirement。FED. CIRCUIT B. J.,14,163。  new window
19.Robbins, Richard L.(1964)。Subtests of “Nonobviousness”: A Nontechnical Approach to Patent Validity。U. PA. L. REV.,112,1169。  new window
20.Trask, Andrew V.(2008)。“Obvious to Try”: A Proper Patentability Standard in the Pharmaceutical Arts?。FORDHAM L. REV.,76,2625。  new window
21.Whelan, Dorothy(1987)。A Critique of the Use of Secondary Considerations in Applying the Section 103 Nonobviousness Test for Patentability。B.C. L. REV.,28,357。  new window
22.Wieker, Amanda(2008)。Secondary Considerations Should Be Given Increased Weight in Obviousness Inquiries Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in the Post-KSR v. Teleflex World。FED. CIR. B. J.,17,665。  new window
會議論文
1.劉懿嫻(2009)。美國專利法非顯而易知性之實證研究:相同發明條件下之客觀指標。新竹。232-259。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.SCHWARTZ, HERBERT F.(2003)。PATENT LAW AND PRACTICE (4th ed. ).。  new window
2.ADELMAN, MARTIN J., RANDALL R. RADER,、JOHN R. THOMAS(2009)。CASES AND MATERIALS ON PATENT LAW。  new window
3.CHISUM, DONALD(2007)。CHISUM ON PATENTS。  new window
4.MOORE, KIMBERLY A.、HOLBROOK, TIMOTHY R.、MICHEL, PAUL R.(2008)。PATENT LITIGATION AND STRATEGY。  new window
5.ROSENBERG, PETER D.(1998)。2 PATENT LAW FUNDAMENTALS (2d ed.).。  new window
6.UNITED STATES PATENT、TRADEMARK OFFICE(2007)。MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE (8th ed. 2001) (REV. 6, Sept. 2007).。  new window
7.Duffy, John F.,、Robert P. Merges(2006)。The Story of Graham v. John Deere Company: Patent Law’s Evolving Standard of Creativity。INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STORIES。  new window
其他
1.Federal Trade Commission(2003)。To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy,http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrptsummary.pdf, 2008/08/28。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE