臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：遛狗活動之休閒效益
書刊名：戶外遊憩研究
作者：于志睿／林晏州
作者(外文)：Yu, Chih-jui／Lin, Yann-jou
出版日期：2010
卷期：23:4
頁次：頁25-49
主題關鍵詞：休閒；休閒效益；遛狗活動；遛狗活動者；Leisure；Leisure benefits；Walking dogs；Dog walkers
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:219
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究旨在探討遛狗活動者從事遛狗活動之休閒效益。本研究所探討之休閒效益包含均衡生活體驗、健全生活內涵及提升生命品質三構面。在以問卷收集資料後，應用描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行分析。研究結果發現在休閒效益的感受方面，遛狗活動者之整體休閒效益感受頗高，其中以均衡生活體驗最高，而提升生命品質的感受最低。結果並發現不同性別、遛狗活動時間、主要活動及共同活動犬體型之遛狗活動者，在部份休閒效益感受上均有顯著差異。其中女性及遛狗活動時間較久之遛狗活動者在均衡生活體驗及健全生活內涵效益上，皆有較高之感受。此外亦發現主要活動不同之遛狗活動者在提升生命品質效益感受上有顯著差異，即遛狗時主要活動爲和狗遊戲之遛狗活動者在提升生命品質效益上感受較高。另一方面結果亦顯示共同活動犬體型不同之遛狗活動者在健全生活內涵及提升生命品質效益感受上有顯著差異，即與中大型犬共同活動之遛狗活動者在健全生活內涵及提升生命品質效益上感受較高。
The purpose of this study was to investigate potential leisure benefits to dog walkers when walking their dogs. The leisure benefits contain three categories: balancing living experiences, promoting the wellness of lifestyle, and enhancing the quality of life. Data were collected via questionnaires and have been analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA. Results showed leisure benefits experienced by dog walkers were high. The greatest was balancing living experiences, while the lowest was enhancing the quality of life. Dog walkers who have different genders, the durations of dog-walking, main activities and body-sized dogs experienced parts of leisure benefits significantly differently. That means dog walkers who are female and had longer durations of dog-walking experienced the balancing living experiences and promoting the wellness of lifestyle benefits more. In addition, dog walkers who engaged in different activities showed a significant difference in experiencing enhancing the quality of life benefits. That means dog walkers who played with dogs as the main activity experienced enhancing the quality of life benefits more. Finally, dog walkers who walked different body-sized dogs showed a significant difference in experienced promoting the wellness of lifestyle and enhancing the quality of life benefits. That means dog walkers who walked medium-sized or big-sized dogs experienced promoting the wellness of lifestyle and enhancing the quality of life benefits more.
期刊論文
1.Ho, C. H.、Sasidharan, V.、Elmendorf, W.、Willits, F. K.、Graefe, A.、Godbey, G.(2005)。Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits。Journal of Leisure Research，37(3)，281-306。  new window
2.Philipp, S. F.(1997)。Race, gender, and leisure benefits。Leisure Sciences，19(3)，191-207。  new window
3.Anderson, W. P.、Reid, C. M.、Jennings, G. L.(1992)。Ownership and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease。Medical Journal of Australia，157，298-301。  new window
4.高俊雄(19990900)。運動員休閒參與、休閒利益與自覺訓練效果之比較研究。戶外遊憩研究，12(3)，43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.高俊雄、溫景財(19981200)。職業運動員休閒利益與自覺訓練效果關係之研究--以臺灣職棒大聯盟本土球員為例。戶外遊憩研究，11(4)，43-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.高俊雄(19931200)。休閒參與體驗形成之分析。戶外遊憩研究，6(4)，1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.高俊雄(19950300)。休閒利益三因素模式。戶外遊憩研究，8(1)，15-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Brown, S. G.,、Rhodes, G. M.(2006)。Relationship among dog ownership and leisure time walking in western Canadian adults。American Journal of Preventive Medicine，30(2)，131-136。  new window
9.Cutt, H.、Giles-Corti, B.、Knuiman, M.、Burke, V.(2007)。Dog ownership, health and physical activity: A critical review of the literature。Health & Place，13(1)，261-272。  new window
10.Cutt, H.、Giles-Corti, B.、Knuiman, M.(2008)。Encouraging physical activity throughdog walking: Why don't some owners walk with their dog。Preventive Medicine，46(2)，120-126。  new window
11.Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., Lynch, J. L.,、Thomas, S.(1980)。Animal companionsand one year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit。Public Health Reports，95(4)，307-312。  new window
12.Kobelt, A. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L.,、Coleman, G. J.(2003)。A survey of dog ownership in suburban。Applied Animal Behaviour Science，82(2)，137-148。  new window
13.Laurier, E., Maze, R.,、Lundin, J.(2006)。Putting the dog back in the park: Animal and human mind-in-action。Mind, Culture & Activity，13(1)，2-24。  new window
14.Lee, H., Mardelle, S.,、Huang, C.(2009)。Evaluation of off-leash dog parks in Texasand Florida: A study of use patterns, user satisfaction, and perception。Landscape and Urban Planning，92(3)，314-324。  new window
15.McNicholas, J.、Collis, G. M.(2000)。Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect。British Journal of Psychology，91(1)，61-70。  new window
16.McNicholas, J., Gilbey, A., Rennie, A., Ahmedzai, S., Dono, J.,、Ormerod, E.(2005)。Pet ownership and human health: A brief review of evidence and issues。British Medical Journal，331(7527)，1252-1254。  new window
17.Serpell, J.(1991)。Beneficial effects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behaviour change。Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine，84(12)，717-720。  new window
學位論文
1.周樺暄(2009)。寵物共生理念落實於臺灣住宅環境之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王裕順(2004)。臺灣地區家犬數目變化趨勢及其原因探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊姮稜(2002)。畜主對畜犬行為發展之影響研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.塗紫吟(2008)。探討家犬服從訓練與社會化課程對飼主休閒生活之效益，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.潘麗雯(2006)。動物輔助休閒活動影響照護機構老人身心健康之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院，桃園。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡珮芸(2005)。都市公園之寵物犬活動區設置研究－以臺北市大安森林公園使用者為調查對象，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ajzen, I.(1999)。Benefits of Leisure: A Social Psychological Perspective。Benefits of Leisure。State College, PA：Venture Publishing。  new window
2.Driver, Beverly L.、Brown, Perry J.、Peterson, George L.(1991)。Benefits of Leisure。Venture Publishing, Inc.。  new window
3.Edwards, V.,、Knight, S.(2006)。Understanding the psychology of walkers with dogs:New approaches to better management。London:。  new window
4.Hamilton-Smith, E.(1991)。The construction of leisure。Benefits of leisure。State College, PA。  new window
5.McPherson, B. D.(1991)。Aging and leisure: A life cycle perspective。Benefits of leisure。State College, PA:。  new window
6.Rolston, H.(1991)。Creation and recreation: Environmental benefits and human leisure。Benefits of leisure。State College, PA:。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kelly, J. R.(1991)。Sociological perspectives on recreation benefits。Benefits of Leisure。State College, PA：Venture Publishing。  new window
2.Orthner, D. K.、Mancini, J. A.(1991)。Benefits of leisure for family bonding。Benefits of Leisure。Stage College, PA：Venture Publishing。  new window
3.鍾瓊珠(1996)。大專運動員休閒行為之研究--以國立臺灣體育學院專長生為例。運動休閒管理論文集。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mannell, R. C.、Stynes, D. J.(1991)。A retrospective: the benefits of leisure。Benefits of Leisure。Venture Publishing。  new window
5.Wankel, L. M.、Berger, B. G.(1991)。The personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity。Benefits of leisure。Venture。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：755（臺灣：754，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67686261
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上