:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:語意部件與關聯強度對成人與國小五年級孩童漢字語意處理效應的差異
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:洪國鈞李姝慧陳修元 引用關係周泰立 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Kuo-chungLee, Shu-huiChen, Shiou-yuanChou, Tai-li
出版日期:2010
卷期:52:3
頁次:頁327-344
主題關鍵詞:字形字音語意部件語意關聯強度OrthographyPhonologySemantic associationSemantic radical
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:171
  • 點閱點閱:99
此研究整合語意部件及語意關聯強度,探討兩者對於語意發展的影響。兩個實驗操弄語意關聯強度字對(高、低相關),及字對含有共同語意部件與否(共同、不同語意部件),要求參與者判斷「視覺-聽覺」呈現字對是否具有語意關係。實驗一以年齡及識字能力皆不同的五年級孩童與成人為參與者,結果顯示在處理高語意相關時,兩組參與者的反應時間差異,會隨著共同語意部件的出現而顯著地減少。實驗二則進一步將五年級孩童分為高、低識字能力孩童兩組,結果顯示兩組孩童在判斷高相關字對時,對共同語意部件字對的區辨敏感度,顯著地優於不同語意部件的字對。本研究推論語意部件會影響孩童的理解歷程;(1)孩童由於語意網絡不似成人精緻化,輔以語意部件有助於高相關字對的語意判斷;(2)對相同年齡孩童而言,高相關字對在語意網絡系統內分享著較多的語意表徵,當字對間出現共同語意部件時,字形相似性有助於偵測與整合字對間的重疊語意表徵,提昇孩童在意義關聯性的正確判斷處理。
While past research has investigated the effects of semantic radical or semantic association on comprehension of meaning for children, little is known about the impact of semantic radical integrated with semantic association. This study addressed this issue using a semantic relatedness judgment task with semantic association strength (strong, weak) and semantic radical (with, without) varied between character pairs. Participants were asked to decide if two Chinese characters were semantically related, when the first character was visually presented and the second character was auditorily presented. Experiment 1 recruited two groups of participants (adults and fifth graders) that differed in ages and word recognition abilities for the semantic judgment task. Our results showed a reduced difference between adults and fifth graders in reaction time on semantic judgment of strongly related radical-shared pairs as compared with that for without-radical pairs. Experiment 2 recruited two groups of fifth graders with various word recognition abilities to perform the semantic judgment task. Our results demonstrated better discrimination sensitivity on judging strongly related radical-shared pairs as compared with that for pairs without shared radicals. The semantic radical was found to affect meaning judgments for fifth graders. There are two implications in this study. First, compared with adults, fifth graders may not have elaborate semantic representations available and thus may not use the whole character to get the correct answer among homophones. They may need the aids of orthographic similarity from the shared radical between characters on meaning judgments of strongly related pairs. Second, when fifth graders process strongly related pairs that have greater overlapping features between characters, orthographic similarity aids in the detection and integration of these features.
期刊論文
1.吳思娜、舒華、王彧(2004)。4-6年級小學生發展性閱讀障礙的異質性研究。心理發展與教育,20(3),46-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳烜之(19840600)。閱讀中文時對部件偵測的歷程。中華心理學刊,26(1),29-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ziegler, J. C.,、Muneaux, M.(2007)。Orthographic facilitation and phonological inhibition in spoken word recognition: A developmental study。Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14,75-80。  new window
4.Yeh, S. L.、Li, J. L. T.、Takeuchi, T.、Sun, V. C.、Liu, W. R.(2003)。The role of learning experience on the perceptual organization of Chinese characters。Visual Cognition,10(6),729-764。  new window
5.Ho, C. S. H., Ng, T. T.,、Ng, W. K.(2003)。A ‘radical’ approach to reading development in Chinese:the role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals。Journal of Literacy Research,35,849-878。  new window
6.洪儷瑜、黃冠穎(20060900)。兩種取向的部件識字教學法對國小低年級語文低成就學生之成效比較。特殊教育研究學刊,31,43-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Perea, Manuel、Rosa, Eva(2002)。The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task。Psychological Research,66(3),180-194。  new window
8.Booth, James R.、Lu, Dong、Burman, Douglas D.、Chou, Tai-Li、Jin, Zhen、Peng, Danling、Zhang, Lei、Ding, Guo-Sheng、Deng, Yuan、Liu, Li(2006)。Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading。Brain Research,1071(1),197-207。  new window
9.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Bitan, T.、Burman, D. D.、Bigio, J. D.、Cone, N. E.、Cao, F.(2006)。Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words。Human Brain Mapping,27(11),915-924。  new window
10.Chou, Tai-Li、Booth, James R.、Burman, Douglas D.、Bitan, Tali、Bigio, Jordan D.、Lu, Dong、Cone, Nadia E.(2006)。Developmental changes in the neural correlates of semantic processing。NeuroImage,29(4),1141-1149。  new window
11.Chou, T. L.、Chen, C. W.、Wu, M. Y.、Booth, J. R.(2009)。The role of inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule in semantic processing of Chinese characters。Experimental Brain Research,198(4),465-475。  new window
12.Moss, H. E.、Marslen-Wilson, W. D.、Ostrin, R. R.、Tyler, L. K.(1995)。Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence form priming。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,21,863-883。  new window
13.Nation, K.、Snowling, M. J.(1999)。Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming。Cognition,70(1),B1-B13。  new window
14.Shu, Hua、Anderson, Richard C.(1997)。Role of Radical Awareness in the Character and Word Acquisition of Chinese Children。Reading Research Quarterly,32(1),78-89。  new window
15.陳秀芬(19990600)。中文一般字彙知識教學法在增進國小識字困難學生識字學習成效之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,17,225-251。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Stanovich, Keith E.(1986)。Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy。Reading Research Quarterly,21(4),360-407。  new window
17.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。  new window
18.王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、陳秀芬(20070900)。低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究--馬太效應之可能表現。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Chen, M. J.、Weekes, B. S.(20040600)。Effects of Semantic Radicals on Chinese Character Categorization and Character Decision。Chinese Journal of Psychology,46(2),181-196。  new window
20.Shu, H.、Anderson, R. C.、Zhang, H.(1995)。Incidental learning of word meanings while reading: A Chinese and American cross-culture study。Reading Research Quarterly,30,76-95。  new window
21.李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20091200)。國小五年級孩童與成人的識字能力對中文字語意處理之效應的差異。中華心理衛生學刊,22(4),345-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬(20080600)。一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報,39(4),555-568。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Cain, K.、Lemmon, K.、Oakhill, J.(2004)。Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity。Journal of Educational Psychology,96(4),671-681。  new window
24.田慧娟(2004)。〈閱讀障礙學生與一般學生在視知覺上之比較研究〉。《台東大學教育學報》,15,33-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M.,、Prieto, T.(1997)。Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging。Journal of Neuroscience,17,353-362。  new window
26.Bitan, T.、Burman, D. D.、Chou, T. L.、Lu, D.、Cone, N. E.、Cao, F.、Booth, J. R.、Bigio, J. D.(2007)。The interaction between orthographic and phonological information in children: An fMRI study。Human Brain Mapping,28(9),880-891。  new window
27.Cao, F., Peng, D. L., Liu, L., Jin, Z., Fan, N., Deng, Y.(2009)。Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantics processing in Chinese word reading。Human Brain Mapping,30,797-809。  new window
28.Chen, Y. C.、Yeh, S. L.(2009)。Radical representation in models of Chinese character recognition。Research in Applied Psychology,43,177-205。  new window
29.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Chen, C. W.、Fan, L. Y.、Chen, S. Y.(2009)。Testing for a cultural influence on reading for meaning in the developing brain: The neural basis of semantic processing in Chinese children。Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,3,(27)1-(27)9。  new window
30.Copland, D. A., de Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K., Wilson, S. J., Eastburn, M.,、Chenerya, H. J.(2003)。Brain activity during automatic semantic priming revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging。NeuroImage,20,302-310。  new window
31.Fernald, A., Perfors, A.,、Marchman, V. A.(2006)。Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year。Developmental Psychology,42,98-116。  new window
32.Fujii, T., Okuda, J., Tsukiura, T., Ohtake, H., Suzuki, M., Kawashima, R.(2002)。Encoding-related brain activity during deep processing of verbal materials: A PET study。Neuroscience Research,44,429-438。  new window
33.Gold, B. T., Balota, D. A., Jones, S. J., Powell, D. K., Smith, C. D.,、Andersen, A. H.(2006)。Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions。The Journal of Neuroscience,26,6523-6532。  new window
34.Gurd, J. M., Amunts, K., Weiss, P. H., Zafiris, O., Zilles, K., Marshall, J. C.(2002)。Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: An fMRI study with clinical implications。Brain,125,1024-1038。  new window
35.Liu, L., Deng, X., Peng, D., Cao, F., Ding, G., Jin, Z.(2009)。Modality- and task-specific brain regions involved in Chinese lexical processing。Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,21,1473-1487。  new window
36.Marchman, Virginai A.、Fernald, Anne(2008)。Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood。Developmental Science,11(3),F9-F16。  new window
37.Matsumoto, A., Iidaka, T., Haneda, K., Okada, T.,、Sadato, N.(2005)。Linking semantic priming effect in functional MRI and event-related potentials。NeuroImage,24,624-634。  new window
38.Mummery, C. J.、Shallice, T.、Price, C. J.(1999)。Dual-process model in semantic priming: A functional imaging perspective。NeuroImage,9,516-525。  new window
39.Rissman, J., Eliassen, J. C.,、Blumstein, S. E.(2003)。An event-related fMRI investigation of implicitsemantic priming。Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15,1160-1175。  new window
40.Siegler, R. S.(2005)。Children’s learning。American Psychologist,60,769-778。  new window
41.Thompson-Schill S. L. D’Esposito M. Aguirre G. K.、Farah M. J.(1997)。Role of left inferior prefrontalcortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,94,14792-14797。  new window
42.Tsao, F. M., Liu, H. M.,、Kuhl, P. K.(2006)。Perception of native and nonnative affricate-fricative contrasts: Cross-Language tests on adults and infants。The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,120,2285-2294。  new window
43.Ventura, P., Kolinsky, R., Fernandes, S., Querido, L.,、Morais, J.(2007)。Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy。Cognition,105,547-576。  new window
44.Wagner, A. D., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Clark, J.,、Poldrack,R. A.(2001)。Recovering meaning: Left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval。Neuron,31,329-338。  new window
45.Whatmough, C., Chertkow, H., Murtha, S.,、Hanratty,K.(2002)。Dissociable brain regions process object meaning and object structure during picture naming。Neuropsychologia,40,174-186。  new window
46.Wheatley, T., Weisberg, J., Beauchamp, M. S.,、Martin,A.(2005)。Automatic priming of semantically related words reduces activity in the fusiform gyrus。Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience,17,1871-1885。  new window
47.Wu, M. Y., Chou, T. L., Chen, C. W., Lee, S. H., Fan, L. Y.,、Hsieh, M. E.(2008)。Neural substrate for integrating semantic and orthographic processing in Chinese children。NeuroImage,41(Suppl. 1),s173-s13。  new window
48.Yeh, S. L.,、Chen, Y. C.(2003)。Perceptual organization of Chinese characters: What is the entry-level unit forskilled readers?。Perception,32(Suppl.),27-27。  new window
49.Yeh, S. L.、Li, J. L.(2004)。Sublexical processing in visual recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence from repetition blindness for sub-character components。Brain and Language,88,47-53。  new window
50.Yeh, S. L.、Lin, Y. H.、Li, J. L.(2004)。Role of character structure in judgments of visual similarity of Chinese characters for children in elementary school。Journal of Education and Psychology,27,95-118。  new window
會議論文
1.黃碧雲(1990)。〈透過“漢字部件分色教學法"開拓華文教學與華文研究的新境界〉2(4),221-228。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yeh, S. L.,、Chen, Y. C.(2002)。Representations of semantic radical and phonetic component in Chinese character recognition:Repetition blindness for subcharacter component。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
研究報告
1.Wu, J. T.,、Liu, I. M.(1987)。Exploring the phonetic andsemantic features of Chinese words。Taipei。  new window
圖書
1.胡志偉、高千惠、羅明(2005)。六百個中文字的自由聯想常模。臺灣心理學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2006)。識字量評估測驗(國字測驗)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Perfetti, C. A.(1985)。Reading ability。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.黃秀霜(2001)。中文年級認字量表 : 指導手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cheng, C. M.,、Wu, S. J.(1994)。Character satiation in Chinese。Advances in the study of Chinese language processing Vol. 1。Taipei。  new window
6.Liu, I. M., Chuang, C. J.,、Wang, S. C.(1975)。Frequency count of 4,000 Chinese words。Taipei。  new window
7.Siegler, R. S.,、Shipley, C.(1995)。Variation, selection, and cognitive change。Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
8.Sinica Corpus.(1998)。Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus (3rd ed。Taipei。  new window
其他
1.三民書局編撰委員會(1998)。《學典》,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Taft, Marcus、Zhu, Xiao-Ping(1995)。The Representation of Bound Morphemes in the Lexicon: A Chinese Study。Morphological Aspects of Language Processing。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.萬雲英(19910000)。兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。中國人.中國心:發展與教學篇。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE