:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後九一一時代人身保護令制度內涵的動態演進--美國聯邦最高法院Boumediene v. Bush判決評釋
書刊名:法學新論
作者:陳欣湉
作者(外文):Chen, Sin-tian
出版日期:2011
卷期:28
頁次:頁99-132
主題關鍵詞:人身保護令反恐普通法權力分立Writ of habeas corpusAnti-terrorismCommon lawSeparation of powers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:33
期刊論文
1.莊坤龍(20060900)。美國反恐戰爭之國際法爭議及最高法院判決分析。歐美研究,36(3),465-514。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Yeh, Jiunn-rong、Chang, Wen-chen(2008)。The emergence of transnational constitutionalism: Its features, challenges and solutions。Penn State International Law Review,27(1),89-124。  new window
3.Leval, Pierre N.(2006)。Judging under the Constitution: Dicta about Dicta。N.Y.U. L. Rev.,81,1249-1250。  new window
4.Tyler, Amanda L.(2009)。Suspension as an Emergency Power。The Yale Law Journal,108,600-694。  new window
5.廖元豪(20020100)。美國反恐怖主義相關法律措施之簡介與評論。月旦法學,80,272-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張文貞(2004)。邁向整合的崎嶇路:美國最高法院對聯邦權限的緊縮。歐美研究,34(2),265-305。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.廖福特(2003)。非理性戰爭行爲之理性人道規範:四個日內瓦公約及兩個議定書。全國律師,7(5),5-16。  延伸查詢new window
8.廖元豪(2006)。總統不得私設刑堂!:美國最高法院Hamdan v. Rumsfeld案簡介。台灣本土法學雜誌,86,271-275。  延伸查詢new window
9.廖福特(2009)。即使戰爭,也要人權:Hamdi及Hamdan評論。歐美硏究,39(4),671-711。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳品潔(2008)。後911時代反恐措施與人權保障之衡平:以美國法爲中心。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Chemerinsky, Erwin、Levenson, Laurie L.(2008)。Criminal Procedure。Aspen Publishers。  new window
2.Freedman, Eric M.(2001)。Habeas Corpus: Rethinking the Great Writ of Libert。New York,NY。  new window
3.Gaffney, Megan(2009)。Boumediene v. Bush: Legal Realism and the War on Terror。44 HARV. C. R.-C.L. L .REV. 197。  new window
4.Ghoshray, Saby(2007)。Hamdan’s Illumination of Article III Jurisprudence in the Wake of the War on Terror。53 WAYNE L. REV. 991。  new window
5.Fitzpatrick, Regina(2007)。Rumsfeld: Implications for the Geneva Conventions。20 HARV.HUM. RTS. J. 339。  new window
6.Katz, Martin J.(2009)。Guantanamo, Boumediene, and Jurisdiction-Stripping: The Imperial President Meets the Imperial Court。25 CONST. COMMENT. 377。  new window
7.Landau, Joseph(2009)。Muscular Procedure: Conditional Deference in the Executive Detention Cases。84 WASH. L. REV. 661。  new window
8.Marinelli, Adam(2009)。A Call for the Proper Recognition of Habeas Corpus in the 21st Century。3 CHARLESTON L. REV. 689。  new window
9.Alexander, Janet Coper(2007)。Jurisdiction-Stripping in a Time of War。95 CAL. L. REV. 1193。  new window
10.Neuborne, Burt(2005)。The Role of Courts in Time of War。29 N.Y.U. REV. L. & SOC. CHANGE 555。  new window
11.Neuman, Gerald L.(2010)。The Habeas Corpus Suspension Clause After Boumediene v. Bush。110 COLUM. L. REV. 537。  new window
12.Robertson, James(2008)。Qua Vadis, Habeas Corpus?。55 BUFF. L. REV. 1063。  new window
13.Alicuben, Allan M. Q.(2007)。Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: The Ongoing Debate of the Proper Use of International Norms in Federal Constitutional Decisions。29 U. HAW. L. REV. 459。  new window
14.Anderson, Michael(2008)。Boumediene v. Bush: Flashpoint in the Ongoing Struggle to Determine the Rights of Guantanamo Detainees。60 Me. L. Rev. 235。  new window
15.Solomon, Deva(2008)。Can Government Indefinitely Detain Individuals Accused of Being Enemy Combatants?。34 WM. MITCHELL. L. REV. 5155。  new window
16.Sonn, Matthew(2007)。Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: A Bad Decision With the Best Intensions - Why the Court Was Wrong in Interpreting the Geneva Conventions and What Should Be Done。19 PACE INT’LL.REV. 143。  new window
17.Steyn, Johan(2004)。Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole。53 lNT’L. & COMP. L. Q. 1。  new window
18.Aranda, Ari(2008)。The Supreme Court’s Post-9/11 War-on-Terror Jurisprudence Special Considerations, Threshold Determinations, and Anticipatory Review。73 BROOK. L. REV.645。  new window
19.Arend, Anthony Clark(2007)。Who's Afraid of the Geneva Conventions? Treaty Interpretation in the Wake of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld。22 AM. U. INT’L L. REV. 709。  new window
20.Uhrig, Emily Garcia(2008)。Boumediene v. Bush, The Great Wrrit, and the Power to Say What the Law is。33 OKLA. CITY U. L. REV. 389。  new window
21.Bradley, Curtis A.(2007)。The Military Commissions Act, Habeas Corpus, and the Geneva Conventions。101AM. J. INT’L.322。  new window
22.Burnett, Christina Duffy(2009)。A Convenient Constitution? Extraterritoriality After Boumediene。109 COLUM. L. REV. 973。  new window
23.Cabranes, Jose A.(2009)。Our Imperial Criminal Procedure: Problems in the Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Constitutional Law。118 YALE L. J. 1660。  new window
24.Calhoun, Emily(2008)。The Accounting: Habeas Corpus and Enemy Combatants。79 U. COLO. L. REV.77。  new window
25.Christian, Sarah(2009)。'Yes, We Can' Grant Guantanamo Detainees Habeas Corpus Rights, in Boumediene v. Bush。29 J. NAT’LASS’N ADMIN. L. JUDICIARY 599。  new window
26.Colangelo, Anthony J.(2009)。De Facto Sovereignty: Boumediene and Beyond。77 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 623。  new window
27.Dziengowski, David C.(2007)。NoteNote, Thinking Globally While Acting Globally: Habeas Corpus,International Law, and the Military Commissions Act of 2006。39 RUTGERS L.J. 159。  new window
28.Fallon, Richard H. Jr.、Meltzer, Daniel J.(2007)。Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction, Substantive Rights,and the War on Terror。120 HARV. L. REV. 2029。  new window
29.Federman, Cary(2006)。The Body and the State: Habeas Corpus and American Jurisprudence。Albany, NY。  new window
30.Halliday, Paul D.、White, G. Edward(2008)。The Suspension Clause: English Text, Imperial Contexts, and American Implications。94 VA. L. REV. 575。  new window
31.Hafetz, Jonathan(2006)。Habeas Corpus, Judicial Review, and Limits on Secrecy in Detentions at Guantanamo。5 CARDOZO PUB. L.,POL’Y & ETHICS J. 127。  new window
32.Heath, J. Erik(2009)。Writing Off the Great Writ: Preserving Habeas Corpus in Boumediene v. Bush。1 N.E. U. L.J. 9。  new window
33.Howell, William G.(2009)。Wartime Judgments of Presidential Power: Striking Down But Not Back。93 MINN. L. Rev. 1778。  new window
34.Quimby, Amy(2007)。Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: Reviewing the Geneva Convention Rights to the Unlawful Enemy Combatants Detained at GITMO。17 WlDENER L.J. 317。  new window
35.Londras, Fiona de(2007)。The Right to Challenge the Lawfulness of Detention: An International Perspective on US Detention of Suspected Terrorists。12 JCSECL. 223。  new window
36.McConnell, Lori(2009)。Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction versus Executive War Power: The Court’s Role in Protecting Individual Rights。34 OKLA. CITY U. L. REV. 565。  new window
37.Neuman, Gerald L.(2009)。The Extraterritorial Constitution After Boumediene v. Bush。82 S. CAL. L.REV. 259。  new window
38.Schatz, Christopher J.、Horst, Noah A. F.(2007)。Will Justice Delayed Be Justice Denied? Crisis Jurispridence, the Guantanamo Detainees, and the Imperiled Role of Habeas Corpus in Curbing Abusive Government Detention。11 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 539。  new window
39.Rosen, Jeffrey(2008)。The Roberts Court & Executive Power。35 PEPP. L. REV. 503。  new window
40.Scribner, Heather P.(2009)。A Fundamental Misconception of Separation of Powers: Boumediene v. Bush。14 Tex. REV. L. & PoL. 90。  new window
41.Tushnet, Mark(2007)。The Political Constitution of Emergency Powers: Some Lessons from Hamdan。91 MINN. L. REV. 1451。  new window
42.Vladeck, Stephen I.(2008)。Habeas Corpus, Alternative Remedies, and the Myth of Swain v. Pressley。13 ROGER WILLAMS U. L. REV. 411。  new window
其他
1.Noble, Brian O.(2008)。Constitutional Law - Habeas Corpus - Guantanamo Bay Detainees Are Entitled to the Privilege of Habeas Corpus Under the U.S. Constitution. Bounmediene v. Bush, 128 S.Ct. 2229,39 CUMB. L. REV. 341。  new window
2.Vladeck, Stephen I.(2008)。The Suspension Clause as a Structural Right,62 U. MIAMI L. REV. 275。  new window
3.Jackson, Vicki C.(2006)。World Habeas Corpus,91 CORNELL L. REV. 303。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE