:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:全唐五代僧人詩格的詩學意義
書刊名:臺大佛學研究
作者:蕭麗華 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Li-hua
出版日期:2010
卷期:20
頁次:頁99-129
主題關鍵詞:詩僧詩格唐詩學以禪論詩Poem-monkRules of poetryPoetics in Tang dynastyDiscusses the poem by Zen
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:122
  • 點閱點閱:86
中國文化自佛經傳譯入中土後,文學、思想、社會、習俗都有進一步融合佛教的痕跡,在詩歌方面也漸漸形成以禪入詩、以禪喻詩的現象。六朝開始的僧人都熟習儒釋道典籍,能詩能文,到唐代更形成所謂的「詩僧」族群,他們參與詩歌創作並提出詩學專著,對詩格、詩法的歸納、詩歌美學的開拓,都有增補之功。 本文以全唐五代僧人的「詩格、詩式」為討論,藉一般詩論的重心,分為「聲律論」、「對偶論」、「體製論」、「創作論」與「風格論」等五大範疇,加以觀察分析,最後歸納出其中的詩學意義有:「繼承六朝聲律、對偶等詩法,參贊唐詩體製」、「增補詩道內涵,深化詩歌美學」、「載錄大量僧俗典範詩作,建立詩歌傳統」、「影響後代詩格、詩話,形成以禪論詩風尚」等幾個面向。本文一方面以詩學既有的成果作對照,一方面透過僧人詩格逐一舉例檢證,用以凸顯僧人在唐詩學建立過程中的貢獻。
Since Buddhism came to China in Han dynasty, its influence has deeply imprinted in every aspect of Chinese culture including literature, philosophy, and poetry in particularly has formed a trend of discussing it by Zen gradually. Being very proficient in Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism, the Buddhist monks in the Six Dynasty were talented literary men of the time. During Tang Dynasty, there were many monks engaging in poetry writing and even formed a so-called “group of poem-monks.” Through examining the Buddhist monks’ literary works in Tang and Five Dynasties, this article aims to discuss their “rules of poetry” and investigate them with the following five categories: “phonology”, “the antithesis theory”, “the system theory”, “the creation theory” and “the style theory.” Their contributions towards poetic include: “to help to form the Tang poem system by inheriting Six Dynasties rules of phonology and antithesis”, “ to enlarge poem connotation and deepen poetry aesthetics”, “to document the massive poetic compositions of both the Buddhist monks and the laymen and set the poetry tradition up”, and “to affect the descendant rules of poetry, and form the trend of discussing the poem by Zen.” With illustrating these above effects, this article highlights the Buddhist monks’ contribution to poetics in Tang Dynasty.
期刊論文
1.王邦雄(20060600)。《莊子》心齋「氣」觀念的詮釋問題。淡江中文學報,14,15-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.舊題南朝陳.釋真諦(1924)。《大乘起信論》。《大正藏》,32冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾錦坤(1989)。從存有論與心性論談儒家與佛家的區別。孔孟學報,58 期,頁253-287。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭雅玲(2001)。皎然意境論的內涵與意義——從唯識學的觀點分析。佛學研究中心學報,6期,頁181-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.傅璇琮(1988)。談王昌齡詩格。文學遺產,6期。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉運蓮(2009)。論鍾嶸「自然英旨」說。現代語文,6期。  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭麗華(2004)。惠洪詩禪的「春」意象——兼為「浪子和尚」辯誣。佛學研究中心學報,9期。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許清雲(1988)。皎然《詩式》研究。臺北市:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.(日)釋遍照金剛(1976)。《文鏡秘府論》。臺北:河洛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.覃召文(1994)。禪月詩魂。香港:香港三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.計有功(197010)。唐詩紀事。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.張伯偉(2002)。全唐五代詩格彙考。南京:江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.赤井益久(2004)。中唐詩壇の研究。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Greenblatt, Stephen J.(1990)。Learning to Curse: Essays in Early Modern Culture。New York:Routledge。  new window
8.羅根澤(1984)。中國文學批評史。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王夢鷗(1984)。古典文學論探索。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃景進(20040000)。意境論的形成:唐代意境論研究。臺北:臺灣學生。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡瑜(1998)。唐詩學探索。里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.蕭麗華(19970000)。唐代詩歌與禪學。臺北:東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Bloom, Harold、高志仁、曾麗玲(1998)。西方正典。立緒出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bloom, Harold、徐文博(1990)。影響的焦慮:詩歌理論。久大文化股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.唐.釋玄奘(1924)。《成唯識論》。《大正藏》,31冊。東京。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐.釋窺基(1924)。般若波羅蜜多心經幽贊》。《大正藏》,冊33。東京。  延伸查詢new window
17.唐.王梵志(1982)。《王梵志詩校輯》,任半塘校輯。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.張伯偉(2008)。禪與詩學。北京:人民。  延伸查詢new window
19.彭雅玲(2009)。僧.法.思——中國詩學的越界思考。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.關子尹、Cassirer, Ernst(1980)。人文科學的邏輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉衛林(1999)。中唐以意境論詩之說與佛教思想的關係。中國詩歌與宗教。香港。  延伸查詢new window
22.赤井益久(2006)。唐釋皎然の詩論について—中國詩學「景情交融」の主題に即して—。中國古典文學論集:松浦友久博士追悼紀念。東京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE