:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後現代主義下婆婆適應機制之探討
書刊名:社會發展研究學刊
作者:楊秋燕廖淑娟 引用關係謝玉玲 引用關係張世宏彭政樹
作者(外文):Yang, Chiu-yenLiao, Shu-chuanHsieh, Yu-lingChang, Shih-honPeng, Cheng-su
出版日期:2011
卷期:9
頁次:頁41-64
主題關鍵詞:後現代主義角色適應機制Post-modernismRoleAdaptation mechanisms
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:199
  • 點閱點閱:103
1980 年代解嚴後的台灣社會,從政治的多元化逐漸發展為社會多元化,展現出在後現代主義社會下的家庭的多元價值觀,婆媳關係自然也不同於以往的傳統社會,擁有尊卑觀念文化結構的婆婆,與面對無法曲就的後現代媳婦;如何走過此種艱困適應機制是值得探討的議題。本研究之研究目的是探討後現代主義社會中婆婆的角色認知感受;也期望了解分析後現代主義下婆婆家務角色之改變及其適應類型。本研究以鮑威爾(Douglas H. Powell)在適應機制中的自我保護反應為理論架構,採取探索性之質化研究方式,並運用深度訪談法完成本項研究。本研究結果發現,在自我防衛部分,婆婆中有反向作用,採用此以達到測試子媳的孝心的目的。在因應措施部分,婆婆們採用扺消作用、壓制作用與昇華作用;在調適機轉部分,婆婆採認同作用、同理心、預期心理與認同與壓抑等。顯示後現代社會下的婆婆,在傳統權力消失後,對現實的了解與認知是其良好的適應機制重要關鍵議題。本文的最大期望是對在後現代主義社會下的社會工作者之工作技巧有更多的啟發。
After abolishing martial law in 1987, Taiwan society has gone through not only political liberalization but also social diversification. It has demonstrated the family multi-values of the post-modern society; consequently, relationships between mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law are different from those of the past. Mothers-in-law who own the beliefs of traditional respectful culture face the post-modern daughters-in-law who do not show obedience have to learn how to go through difficulties. Thus, the issues of adjustment mechanisms are worth to be explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate cognition and feeling as the role of mother-in-law in the post-modernism society as well as to understand and analyze mothers-in-law's role changes and adjustment models. Theoretical underpinning is based on Powell's three-level self protection response of adaptation mechanisms. This study utilized exploratory qualitative research, which was conducted with in-depth interviews. There were three major findings from this study. First, in the level of ego defenses, mothers-in-law showed reversion to test daughters-in-law for their filial piety. Second, in the level of coping devices, mothers-in-law used undoing, suppression and sublimation. The third finding is in the level of adjustment mechanisms, in which mothers-in-law demonstrated identification, empathy, anticipation, identification and repression. These findings manifest that understanding and recognizing reality of mothers-in-law in the postmodern society is the important issue for their good adjustment after their losing traditional power. Great expectations lie on giving implications to social workers for their better techniques and skills practiced in the post-modern society.
期刊論文
1.趙善如、黃松林、陳武宗(2009)。後現代主義下老人福利服務需求觀點--以高雄市爲例。台灣健康照顧硏究學刊,6,56-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.古允文(20010600)。平等與凝聚:臺灣社會福利發展的思考。社會政策與社會工作學刊,5(1),145-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡文山(20031200)。後現代主義思潮對臺灣當前課程改革的影響與啟示。臺中師院學報,17(2),113-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許詩淇、黃囇莉(20060800)。「情同母女」之外:婆媳關係的多元和諧。本土心理學研究,26,35-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.孔祥明(19991200)。婆媳過招為哪樁?:婆婆、媳婦與兒子(丈夫)三角關係的探討。應用心理研究,4,57-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Semmler, P. L.、Williams, C. B.(2000)。Narrative Therapy: A storied context for multicultural counseling。Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development,28(1),51-62。  new window
會議論文
1.利翠珊(2000)。親子情感、家庭角色與個人界域:已婚女性代間情感糾結的經驗與內涵。第五屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會,(會議日期: 2000年12月8日至10日)。中研院。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Bradley, D. B.(2007)。Working with older adults in the community。Bowling Green, KY:Western Kentucky University。  new window
學位論文
1.邱文彬(1993)。三代同住家庭中代間婦女關係之探討(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊彗君(2003)。婆媳衝突與調適心路歷程之硏究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭玉秀(2004)。從婆媳互動看臺灣中產階層婦女覺知的家庭圖像(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘福來(2005)。國中校長營造學校團隊凝聚力之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳嘉瑜(2002)。代間矛盾經驗之分析:成年子女婚後與父母之關係研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.車先蕙(1997)。內、外之間:婆媳間的關係與權力(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.俞彼鈞(2000)。適應與心理衛生人生週期之常態適應。台北:揚智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldfarb, Jeffrey C.(1998)。Civility and Subversion: The Intellectual in Democratic Society。London:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hinsie, J.、Campbell, R.(1970)。Psychiatric Dictionary。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Homan, R.(1991)。The Ethics of Social Research。London:Longman。  new window
5.Pillari, V.(1998)。Human Behavior in the Social Environment。Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc.。  new window
6.Powell, D. H.(1983)。Understanding Human Adjustments。NY:Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.。  new window
7.Vaillant, G. E.(1977)。Adaptation to life: How the best and brightest come of age。Boston:Little Brown。  new window
8.蔡篤堅、梁妃儀、洪德仁(2003)。協助社群認同發展的口述歷史實踐--結合理論與實務的操作手冊。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Sawicki, Jana(1991)。Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body。Routledge。  new window
10.Fook, J.(2002)。Social work: Critical theory and practice。London:Sage。  new window
11.高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:揚帆再航之旅。高雄:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.Healy, K.(2000)。Social Work Practices: Contemporary on Change。London:Sage。  new window
13.Healy, K.(2005)。Social Work Theories in Context: Creating frameworks for practice。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
14.蔡清田(20040000)。課程發展行動研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.Patton, Michael Quinn(1987)。How to use qualitative methods in evaluation。Newbury Park:CA:Sage。  new window
17.Loevinger, J.,、Wessler, R.(1970)。Measuring ego development I: Construction and use of a sentence completion test。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳清山(2007)。後現代思潮與教育改革。後現代思潮與教育發展。臺北市:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(1999)。Establishing Trustworthiness。Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE