:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:李贄與許筠的女性觀
書刊名:東吳中文線上學術論文
作者:玄柄勳
作者(外文):Hyun, Byung-hun
出版日期:2011
卷期:14
頁次:頁71-92
主題關鍵詞:李贄許筠女性觀見識情慾Li ZhiHeo GyunAffectionLustTalent
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
傳統社會女性的地位甚低,而且從本質上歧視女性,以為不堪學道,因此女性的角色僅限於賢妻良母。 李贄與許筠都是萬曆年間且在思想史上被視為異端的人物,雖然一是明朝,另一是朝鮮,但他們均因具有反傳統思想而被社會排斥,其中對女性的觀點更是與眾不同。李贄與許筠都注重男女之「情」,強調男女之間自然所生的情愛。然而李贄所主張的男女之「情」止於觀念上的言詞,許筠之「情」則全不避諱身體情欲,且言行合一,以自然真情為立身之準則。兩人十分肯定女性之才識,故以獨創的眼光來認定女性的真價值,不管是身分高下、貴賤,不因性別差異而有差別。兩人的女性觀雖然不能完全脫離傳統的樊籬,但可說是傳統趨向近代啟蒙思的重要橋樑。
In traditional society, women's status is low. With a strong discrimination against women, their role is strictly limited as housewives and mothers. Despite the fact that Li Zhi was born in China and Heo Gyun was born in Chosun during Wan-li of the Ming Dynasty, they both had thoughts that were considered as heterodoxy in history of ideas. For example, they had anti-traditional concepts that were most likely to be excluded from the society. Particularly, their views of women were different from most of the other people around that time. Both Heo Gyun and Li Zhi focused on "affection" and on love –which naturally occurred– between men and women. Li Zhi, however, only limited himself to the concept of emotional claims on the words. On the other hand, when Heo Gyun stated about "affection", he did not evade the issue of lust; he united his actions and words to practice what he believed was right. This way, Heo Gyun completely broke the Confucian ethic’s point of view, but regarded the truth of nature as the criteria for life. Unique among the society long time ago, Heo Gyun and Li Zhi believed that identifying women’s true value was very crucial; they consistently thought that women’s abilities and insights should be recognized at a greater extent. In fact, they also claimed that men and women are no different in terms of lust and talent. Their point of view for women, although was not able to revolutionize the ideas and beliefs back then, can still be recognized as an important bridge between the traditional beliefs and the modern enlightenment.
期刊論文
1.李永浩(200812)。李卓吾與朝鮮儒學。陽明學,21集,299-323。  延伸查詢new window
2.朴現圭(2005)。許筠導入李贄書籍。中國語文學。  延伸查詢new window
3.金東旭(1968)。許筠和女性。亞細亞女性研究,6。  延伸查詢new window
4.禹尚烈、林香蘭(2007)。李贄與許筠比較論。中國學研究,41,227-242。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周振甫(199104)。周易譯注。台北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅貫中(1971)。三國演義。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.程顥、程頤、潘富恩(2000)。二程遺書。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.許蘇民(1998)。李贄的真與奇。南京市:南京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱熹、黎靖德、王星賢(1986)。朱子語類。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.李贄(2000)。焚書。社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.溝口雄三、索介然、龔穎(1997)。中國前近代思想的演變。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊天宇(1997)。禮記譯注。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.戴德、王聘珍、王文錦(1983)。大戴禮記解詁。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭玄、賈公彥、彭林、王文錦(2000)。儀禮注疏。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭玄、賈公彥、趙伯雄、王文錦、陸德明、孔穎達、李學勤、十三經注疏編委會(2000)。周禮注疏。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱熹(2004)。盂子集注。四書集注。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
13.耿定向(1997)。耿天臺先生文集。四庫全書存目叢書. 集部。臺南縣。  延伸查詢new window
14.朱憙(2004)。論語集注。四書集注。長沙。  延伸查詢new window
15.神宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
16.李滉(1971)。退溪全書。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
17.許筠(1967)。國譯惺所覆瓿藁。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
18.李植(2000)。國譯澤堂集。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
19.金中清(1997)。苟全先生文集。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
20.安鼎福(1996)。國譯順庵集。韓國:民族文化推進會。  延伸查詢new window
21.尹國一(2005)。新編經國大典。  延伸查詢new window
22.李家源(2000)。儒家叛徒許筠。韓國:延世大學校出版部。  延伸查詢new window
23.金東旭(1981)。許筠研究。韓國:새문社。  延伸查詢new window
24.許筠(2000)。乙丙朝天錄。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
25.姜明官(2000)。책벌레들조선을만들다。韓國。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top