Factors in Using Workbooks and/or Worksheets for English Classroom Assessment_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Factors in Using Workbooks and/or Worksheets for English Classroom Assessment
書刊名：	課程與教學
作者：	謝麗雪
作者(外文)：	Hsieh, Li-hsueh
出版日期：	2011
卷期：	14:3
頁次：	頁199-238
主題關鍵詞：	教室評量；英語教學；多元評量；Classroom assessment；English teaching；Multiple assessment
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:36 點閱:30

依據學生能力所設計的課堂評量能促進學習，而使用書面評量又比其他方式更有效率。但是不同因素，例如時間、人力等限制，可能會影響老師課堂使用的評量方式。因此本文之研究目的為探討教室評量使用的情形，包括：1.作業本或學習單是否為受試者喜歡的評量方式；2.英文老師是否使用作業本或學習單作為課堂評量；3.受試者背景是否影響其作決定使用作業本或學習單的過程；4.三個最明顯影響使用作業本或學習單的因素。研究情境及方式為要求1472研究所考生寫一篇英文作文，題目為：如果他們是英文老師時，是否會使用作業本或學習單，原因為何？作者收集及分析1442 有效受試者之答案。結果顯示：1.比起作業本，受試者較喜歡使用學習單；2.共14種理由可解釋受試者使用的作業評量因素；3.欲就讀之不同研究所的考生表達喜歡不同的作業評量方式；其中4.教學、練習及感覺為最明顯的作業評量因素。有鑑於此，作者提出一些英語教學上之建議。

以文找文

Classroom assessment can facilitate students' learning process by assessing their competencies, and using written forms is substantially more efficient than the alternatives, such as performance assessment or portfolio assessment. However, various factors, such as time and labor constraints, may encourage or hinder teachers' use of classroom tests. The aims of this paper are to explore the use of classroom assessment, including (1) to identify a favorable assessment form (workbooks (WBs) or worksheets (WSs)); 2) to discover possible factors underlying English teachers' decisions to use WBs or WSs in class; 3) to explore whether test takers' backgrounds influence their decision-making process; and 4) to justify the three most prevalent reasons for using WBs or WSs. For this study, 1,472 students taking a graduate school entrance examination wrote an English essay discussing whether they would use WBs or WSs if they were English teachers. Hand-written notes from 1,442 valid passages were collected and analyzed. The responses indicated a preference for teaching with WSs rather than WBs, and the candidates' reasons for using the forms were classified into 14 categories. Candidates interested in different graduate programs expressed varying preferences. Above all, pedagogy, practice and emotion emerged as the top three categories, and suggestions are offered to improve educational curriculum design.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Klenowski, V.(2009)。Editorial: Assessment for learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective。Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice，16(3)，263-268。
2.	Beghetto, R. A.(2005)。Preservice teachers’ self-judgments of testing taking。The Journal of Educational Research，98(6)，376-380。
3.	陳玉美(20060100)。Toward Student and Teacher Development: Applying a Multiple Approeach to English Classroom Assessment。英語教學，30(3)，1-22。
4.	Foyle, H.、Bailey, G.(1988)。Homework experiments in social studies: Implications for teaching。Social Education，52(4)，292-294。
5.	Gill, B.、Schlossman, S. L.(2003)。Parents and the politics of homework: Some historical perspectives。Teachers College Record，105(5)，846-871。
6.	Green, K. E.(1992)。Different opinions on testing between preservice and inservice teachers。The Journal of Educational Research，86，37-42。
7.	Hsieh, L. H.、Hsiao, Y. P.(2004)。On the background and assessment perception of elementary school English teachers in Kaohsiung County。The Journal of National Tainan Teachers College，55(1)，237-261。
8.	Lee, J. F.、Pruitt, K. W.(1979)。Homework assignments: Classroom games or teaching tools?。Clearinghouse，53，31-35。
9.	Marzano, R. J.、Pickering, D. J.(2007)。Errors and allegations about research on homework。Phi Delta Kappan，88(7)，507-517。
10.	Marzano, R. J.、Pickering, D. J.(2007)。The case for and against homework。Educational Leadership，74-79。
11.	McCalman, L.、Adeyemi, M.(2001)。Homework: Pupils' views from Botswana and England。Curriculum and Teaching，16(1)，75-86。
12.	Murphy, J.、Decker, K.(1990)。Homework use at the high school level: Implications for principles。NASSP Bulletin，74，40-43。
13.	Sachs, J.、Chan, C.(2003)。Dual scaling analysis of Chinese students，conceptions of learning。Educational Psychology，23(2)，181-193。
14.	Stefanou, C.、Parkes, J.(2003)。Effects of classroom assessment on student motivation in fifth-grade science。The Journal of Educational Research，96(3)，152-162。
15.	Tavares, L.(1998)。Changing homework habits: Rethinking attitudes。English Teaching Forum (Jan-Mar)，36-37。
16.	Trautwein, U.、Köller, O.(2003)。The relationship between homework and achievement: Still much of a mystery。Educational Psychology Review，15(2)，115-145。
17.	Voorhis, E. V.(2003)。Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family involvement and science achievement。The Journal of Educational Research，96(6)，323-338。
18.	Wallinger, L. M.(1998)。The impact o f alternative scheduling practices on students' performance in French I.。dissertation Abstracts International，59(9)，3315A。
19.	Xu, J.(2004)。Family help and homework management in urban and rural secondary schools。Teachers College Record，106(9)，1786-1803。
20.	Xu, J.(2005)。Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students。The Journal of Educational Research，99(1)，46-55。
21.	Xu, J.、Como, L.(1998)。Case studies of families doing third-grade homework。Teachers College Record，100(2)，402-436。
22.	Xu, J.、Como, L.(2003)。Family help and homework management reported by middle school students。The Elementary School Journal，103(5)，503-517。
23.	Xu, Jianzhong、Yuan, Ruiping(2003)。Doing homework: Listening to students’, parents’, and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community。School Community Journal，13(2)，25-44。
24.	Yang, T. L.(2008)。Factors affecting EFL teachers' use of multiple classroom assessment practices with young language learners。English Teaching &. Learning，32(4)，85-123。
25.	何宜康(20060700)。學習單的美麗與哀愁。師友月刊，469，78-81。延伸查詢
26.	劉安彥(20031100)。The theory and practice of teaching assessment。Bimonthly Journal of Educational Resources and Research，55，100-108。
27.	Cool, V. A.、Keith, T. Z.(1991)。Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement。Contemporary Educational Psychology，16，28-44。
28.	Cha, Y. C .(2004)。Teachers, ability grouping instruction, assessments, and materials: A study of primary school English teaching of the nine-year integrated curriculum。Journal of National Taipei Teachers College，17(1)，167-196。
29.	廖柏森(20070300)。Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching English to Elementary School Children。英語教學，31(1)，43-76。
30.	Tsai, Chih-hsin(20050700)。Junior College Students' Perceptions of English Vacation Homework。英語教學，30(1)，69-91。
31.	吳裕益、林堂馨(20020600)。多元評量之發展與改進--專訪高雄師範大學特殊教育學系吳裕益教授。教育研究，98，18-23。延伸查詢
32.	Cheng, Hsing-Fu、Dörnyei, Zoltán(2007)。The Use of Motivational Strategies in Language Instruction: The Case of EFL Teaching in Taiwan。Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching，1(1)，153-174。
33.	Brophy, J. E.(1987)。Synthesis of research on strategies for motivation students to learn。Educational Leadership，45(2)，40-48。
34.	Hsu, Yueh-kuei(20030700)。Researching Multiple Assessment: Evidence from EFL Elementary School Classrooms。英語教學，28(1)，29-60。
35.	Paschal, R. A.、Weinstein, T.、Walberg, H. J.(1984)。The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis。Journal of Educational Research，78(2)，97-104。
36.	李坤崇(20020600)。多元化教學評量理念與推動策略。教育研究月刊，98，24-36。延伸查詢
37.	陳亮伃(20020600)。如何落實多元評量--專訪稻江科技暨管理學院郭生玉校長。教育研究，98，11-17。延伸查詢
38.	Epstein, J. L.、Van Voorhis, F. L.(2001)。More than minutes: Teachers' roles in designing homework。Educational Psychologist，36(3)，181-193。
39.	Wallinger, Linda M.(2000)。The role of homework in foreign language learning。Foreign Language Annals，33(5)，483-497。
40.	Bada, E.、Okan, Z.(2000)。Students’ language learning preferences。TESL-EJ，4(3)，1-15。
41.	Warton, P. M.(2001)。The forgotten voices in homework: views of students。Educational Psychologist，36(3)，155-165。

學位論文
1.	陳仕芳(2005)。國小教師教學信念之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。延伸查詢
2.	Hong W. H.(2007)。Taipei City English teachers’ attitude and teaching action for the Basic English Learning Assessment in Taipei City(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。
3.	Wallinger, L. M.(1998)。The impact of alternative scheduling practices on students’ performance in French I.(博士論文)。College of William and Mary，Williamsburg, VA。
4.	陳秀美(2003)。國小英語教師多元評量信念與實施概況研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院，台北。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Patton, M. Q.、吳芝儀、李奉儒(2005)。質的評鑑與研究。台北：桂冠出版社。延伸查詢
2.	Birdsall, M.(2003)。Time saver cross-curricular English activities 1~3。Taipei：Shider。
3.	Brown, H. D.(2007)。Teaching by principle: An interactive approach to language pedagogy。Pearson Education。
4.	Cooper, H.(2001)。The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。
5.	Heaton, J. B.(1990)。Writing English language tests。London：Longman。
6.	Heaton, J. B.(1991)。Classroom testing。London：Longman。
7.	May, P.(1997)。Exam classes。New York：Oxford University Press。
8.	Nunan, D.(1987)。The teacher as curriculum developer。Sydney：National Center for English Language Teaching and Research。
9.	Thomas, A. H.(1992)。Homework: How effective? How much to assign? The need for clear policies。Eugene, OR：Oregon School Study Council。
10.	Yalden, J.(1987)。Three levels in a balanced system. The communicative syllabus: Evaluation, design and implementation。Englewood Cliffs：Prentice-Hall。
11.	Lee, K. C.(2004)。多元化教學評量。臺北市：心理。延伸查詢
12.	Lin, C. T.(2000)。有效数學--理論與策略。臺北市：五南。延伸查詢
13.	(1995)。Longman dictionary of contemporary English。London：Longman。
14.	Gower, R.、Phillips, D.、Walters, S.(1995)。Teaching practice handbook。New York：Heinemann。
15.	McKay, P.(2006)。Assessing young language learners。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
16.	Harmer, J.(1998)。How to teach English。Longman。
17.	Brown, D.(2004)。Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices。New York：Longman。
18.	Cooper, H.(1989)。Homework。Longman。
19.	Klenowski, V.(2002)。Developing Portfolios for Learning and Assessment: Processes and Principles。Routledge Falmer。
20.	Cohen, D.(1994)。Assessing language ability in the classroom。Boston：Heinle & Heinle。
21.	教育部(2001)。教學創新--九年一貫課程問題與解答。台北市：教育部。延伸查詢
22.	Sinclair, J.(2001)。Collins COBUILD English dictionary for advanced learners。Glasgow：HarperCollins Publishers。
23.	Ioannou-Georgiou, S.、Pavlou, P.(2003)。Assessing young learners。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
24.	吳毓瑩、桂怡芬(1997)。形成性評量效度的驗證及教師的角色－以自然科平時評量為例。當代師資培育的課程教材教法。臺北：漢文。延伸查詢
25.	葉錫南(2001)。多元化評量。國民中小學英語教學活動設計及評量指引。臺北：教育部。延伸查詢
26.	廖曉青(2002)。英語教學法。台北：五南圖書公司。延伸查詢

單篇論文
1.	Hsieh, L. H.，Hsiao, Y. P.(2003)。The perceived assessment concepts of elementary school English teachers in Tainan City。
2.	Wallinger, L. M.(1997)。Foreign language homework from beginning to end: A case study of homework practices in foreign language classes，Williamsburg, VA：College of William and Mary。

其他
1.	Wolf, N.(2003)。Functions of worksheets。
2.	Chen, S. W.(20030625)。快樂學習與恐怖評量。延伸查詢

圖書論文
1.	Rea-Dickins, P.、Rixon, S.(2000)。Assessment of young learners’ English: Reasons and means。Young learners of English: Some research perspectives。Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex：Pearson Education。
2.	Huang, C. C.(1997)。教學硏究與教學革新。教學原理。臺北市：師大書苑。延伸查詢
3.	You, C. N.(2007)。多元評量的實施困境與因應策略。教育改革的挑戰與省思。高雄市：麗文。延伸查詢
4.	Smith, D. B.(1996)。Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom。Teacher learning in language teaching。New York：Cambridge University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣中小學音樂課程目標變革之批判論述分析
2.	設計行動研究在空間美化的實務應用
3.	檔案評量於國中英語教學應用之個案研究
4.	幼兒園教師教學信念與正向管教之研究
5.	多元評量實施之理論與實務--以健康教育為例
6.	大學英語主修生暑期英語學習經驗與看法之探究
7.	高中職英語教師多元評量實施現況之研究：以臺中縣市為例
8.	教師評鑑之理念、實務與分析及系統研製--以建國科技大學為例
9.	畫中有話--低年級看圖作文創意教學之行動研究
10.	Teacher and Student Perceptions of the Teacher's Role in the CLT Conversation Classroom
11.	以直笛教學輔助國小學童音樂表現能力之探討--相關文獻之回顧與分析
12.	建構社區文化圖像之藝術行動課程：「行動學習」導向在大學通識藝術教育上的應用
13.	大學通識課程之教學評量新思維：以通識能力指標為評量基準
14.	體育教學多元評量之探討
15.	「數Fun興中，舞動數學生命力」學校本位課程的發展與實踐

1.	模糊德菲法與層級分析法在國中資優生研究作品評量指標建構之應用
2.	高中校長校務經營未來力影響因素之研究
3.	從全人教育觀點探討台南市國小低年級實施多元評量之研究
4.	教師課程實施關注階段與使用層次之研究--以二所國民小學為例
5.	國小六年級學生對體育教師教學策略知覺之研究
6.	以徑路搜尋法表徵內隱與外顯知識結構的效度探討

1.	「行動-反思」做中學教學模式於連鎖企業管理課程之應用
2.	綜合活動學習領域教學與評量
3.	認知情意技能教育目標分類及其在評量的應用
4.	教學目標、能力指標與評量
5.	百年來教學生態的蛻變與突破

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫