:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以靜思語教學提升國民小學學生個人責任感之行動研究
書刊名:教育科學期刊
作者:林秀蓮陳慧芬林秀貞
作者(外文):Lin, Hsiu-lienChen, Hui-fenLin, Hsiu-chen
出版日期:2011
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁81-104
主題關鍵詞:靜思語教學責任感品格教育Jing-Si aphorisms teachingResponsibilityCharacter education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究採行動研究法,以靜思語教學做爲提升學生個人責任感的方案,探討教師以靜思語教學提升學生個人責任感的實施成效、歷程中遭遇的困境與因應之道及教師在教學中的省思與成長。本研究針對青春國小五年級天使班(化名)的學生,進行六週三階段的靜思語教學,教導學生從責任感的認知層面進入實踐層面,透過觀察、訪談、文件分析與記錄省思札記,蒐集相關資料。研究發現:靜思語教學能確實提升學生個人責任感的認知程度和實踐程度;家長的支持與配合有助於提升靜思語教學的實施成效;以靜思語教學爲主的品格教育尚存宗教疑慮,有賴教師與家長進行充分溝通;本行動研究歷程,有助於提升教師課程設計與教學實踐之專業成長。
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects, problems and solutions of using Jing-Si Aphorisms teaching as an action program to improve personal responsibility of the elementary school students. The introspection and growth of the teacher in aphorism teaching process were also discussed.The subjects were the fifth-grade students of angel class (a pseudonym) who attended six-week aphorisms teaching. There are three stages to teach students the cognition and practice of responsibility. The data collected from observation, interview, document analysis, and reflective journal were analyzed to understand the changes in students' cognition and performance of responsibility.The findings of the study were as following: 1. Jing-Si Aphorisms teaching actually improved the cognition of students' personal responsibility; 2. Jing-Si Aphorisms teaching helped the practice of students' personal responsibility; 3. the support and cooperation of parents helped to promote the effects of aphorisms teaching; 4. religious concerns existed in aphorisms teaching, and the communication between teachers and parents was needed; 5. this action research helped the teacher's professional growth in curriculum designing and teaching practice.
期刊論文
1.何琦瑜、李宜蓁(20090623)。親師挑戰--管教的危機。親子天下,6,148-155。  延伸查詢new window
2.Howard, R. W.、Berkowitz, M. W.、Schaeffer, E. F.(2004)。Politics of character education。Educational policy,18(1),188-215。  new window
學位論文
1.張琬琴(2004)。靜思語教學對增進國小學童孝道實踐之成效研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹允文(2007)。美國新品格教育理論取向與實施方案之探究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.慈濟教師聯誼會(1999)。大愛引航:靜思語教學指引。臺北:靜思文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.何琦瑜、吳毓珍(2007)。教出品格力。臺北市:天下。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳秀英、呂素琴(1996)。妙語生華:靜思語教學故事。臺北市:靜思文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Smiles, S.、劉曙光、宋景堂、劉志明(2009)。品格的力量。臺北市:立緒文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bennett, W. J.(1993)。The book of virtues: A treasury of great moral stories。New York, NY:Simon and Schuster。  new window
6.Canfield, J.、Siccone, F.(1993)。101 ways to develop student self-esteem and responsibility。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.Glassman, B. S.(2008)。Responsibility。San Diego, CA:Bearing Books。  new window
8.吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育小辭書。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.詹楝樑(1997)。德育原理。臺北市:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.張春興(1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃德祥(2001)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20101124)。甚麼是責任感,http://www.hkedcity.net/article/parent_ad_ethics/050824-002/。  new window
2.Josephson, M.(20110111)。The six pillars of character,http://josephsoninstitute.org/sixpillars.html。  new window
3.Ryan, K.(20110109)。The six Efs of character education,http://www.bu.edu/education/caec/files/6E.htm。  new window
4.教育部(2009)。教育部品德教育促進方案,http://ce.naer.edu.tw/index3-l.html, 2014/01/27。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.周慧菁(2004)。品格要怎麼教。品格決勝負--未來人才的秘密。臺北市:天下。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mecca, A. M.(1989)。Foreword。The social importance of self-esteem。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE