:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:年輕婦女接受乳房攝影篩檢之現況及其影響因素--以桃園某地區為例
書刊名:護理暨健康照護研究
作者:賴思妤王美治朱麗陵謝泉發
作者(外文):Lai, Su-yuWang, Mei-chinChu, Li-lingHsieh, Chuan-fa
出版日期:2011
卷期:7:3
頁次:頁224-232
主題關鍵詞:乳癌乳房攝影年輕婦女Breast cancerMammographyYoung women
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:57
背景 : 近二十年來,乳癌的發生率及死亡率逐年攀升,罹患年齡層卻逐年下降,乳房攝影術已被證實是一有效乳癌篩檢工具,然而目前國家政策僅提供 45歲(含)以上婦女免費施作, 44歲(含)以下年輕婦女須自費接受乳房攝影檢查。 目的 : 探討 30-44歲年輕婦女執行乳房攝影篩檢之現況及其影響因素。 方法 : 本研究使用次級資料分析,分析 2002年至 2007年間,首次參與壢新醫院之世代研究(Li-Shin Outreaching Neighboring Screening, LIONS),且年齡介於 30-44歲共 1853位之女性為調查對象,過往是否接受乳房攝影檢查,與其人口學特徵、乳癌高危險因子等資料之相關性,並以多變項邏輯式迴歸估算調整後勝算比與 95%信賴區間。 結果 : 在 1,853位女性中有 220位願意自費接受乳房攝影,其平均年齡為 38.5 ± 4.2歲,在其影響執行乳房攝影之動機調查發現,定期執行乳房自我檢查者比未定期執行乳房自我檢查者多出 1.96倍( 95% CI = 1.34-2.87);過往有乳房疾病者較無乳房疾病者會執行乳房攝影篩檢多出 2.27倍( 95% CI = 1.61-3.20);而過往有家族乳癌病史者比無家族乳癌病史者執行乳房攝影篩檢則有 2.34倍( 95% CI = 1.25-4.36)。 實務應用 : 研究結果提供政府相關機構,對於乳癌攝影篩檢之醫療保險給付政策之參考依據,並能針對年輕但處於高危險之婦女族群有更多之保險措施。
Background: Incidence and mortality rates for breast cancer have increased dramatically in the past two decades, while average onset age has fallen. Mammography is accepted as an effective screening tool for breast cancer. However, as the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) only pays for mammography tests in women over 45 years of age, women under this age must pay for elective mammography examinations out-of-pocket. Purpose: This study examined factors that encouraged women under 45 years to have a mammography examination despite lack of NHI reimbursement. Methods: We used secondary data analysis in this study. We enrolled a total of 1853 subjects aged 30-44 years who participated in a Li-Shin Outreaching Neighboring Screening (LIONS) program for the first time between 2002 and 2007. Prior mammography utilization, demographic profiles and risk factors for breast cancer were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression model was applied to estimated an adjusted the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: A total of 220 women with an average age of 38.5 ± 4.2 years had elective mammography. In terms of analyzed factors, women regularly practicing breast self-examination showed a higher mammography usage rate (OR 1.96, 95% CI = 1.34-2.87) and those with a prior history of breast disease were more often to use mammography (OR 2.27, 95% CI = 1.61-3.20). In addition, relatively more individuals with a family history of breast cancer had regular mammography tests than those without (OR 2.34, 95% CI = 1.25-4.36). Implications: Results provide the information to help further promote mammography screening in women aged 30 to 44 years. Acquired data will also help mammography insurance reimbursement policy makers to review and revise relevant healthcare strategies.
期刊論文
1.張金堅、郭文宏、王明暘(20080400)。臺灣乳癌之流行病學。中華民國癌症醫學會雜誌,24(2),85-93。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃志中、王秀紅(20031000)。女性與醫療環境。護理雜誌,50(5),16-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.文羽苹、許玫玲(20051200)。預防保健的成本效益評估:以乳癌篩檢為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,24(6),519-528。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王秀紅、黃志中(2010)。婦女的健康促進與疾病預防。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(20101213)。歷年惡性腫瘤死亡人數、死亡率。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳崑池(2006)。推估篩檢模式之參數以Gompertz分配運用在馬可夫鏈式上,台南市。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳美燕、楊瑞珍、毛潤芝(2003)。從研究資料分析我國女性乳癌篩檢之政策。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃獻樑、程劭儀(2006)。乳癌的篩檢。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡金妹、趙婉純、魯承章、陳秋如、戴龍戎(2005)。婦女對篩檢性X光乳房攝影應有的認知。  延伸查詢new window
7.Armstrong, K., Chen, T. M., Albert, D., Randall, T., & Schwartz, J. S.(2001)。Cost-effectiveness of Raloxifene and hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: Impact of breast cancer risk。  new window
8.Bainbridge, J.(2007)。A new direction for breast cancer research。  new window
9.Chang, H. C., Kung, Y. Y., Hsieh, C. F., Hsiung, L. H., Chang, S. H., & Chen, T. H.(2008)。Biological risk factors relevant to chronic disease in three ethnic groups in Taiwan: Results from Li-Shin Outreaching Neighborhood Screening (LIONS A1)。  new window
10.Cohen, M.(2006)。Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer。  new window
11.Hanson, K., Montgomery, P., Bakker, D., & Conlon, M.(2009)。Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: An integrative review of the literature。  new window
12.Hemminki, K., Forsti, A., Sundquist, J., & Ji, J.(2008)。Risk of familial breast cancer is not increased after pregnancy。  new window
13.Humpel, N., & Jones, S. C.(2004)。“I don’t really know, so it’s a guess” : Women’s reasons for breast cancer risk estimation。  new window
14.Humphrey, L. L., Helfand, M., Chan, B. K. S., & Woolf, S. H.(2002)。Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive service taskforce。  new window
15.Machia, J.(2001)。Breast cancer: Risk, prevention, Tamoxifen。  new window
16.Matloff, E., Moyer, A., Shannon, K. M., Niendorf, K. B., & Col, N. F.(2006)。Health women with a family history of breast cancer impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making。  new window
17.McElmurry, B. J., Norr, K. F., & Parker, R. S.(1993)。Women’s health and development,Boston:Jones and Bartlett。  new window
18.Park, N. J., & Kang, D. H.(2006)。Breast cancer risk and immune responses in healthy women。  new window
19.Sivell, S., Iredale, R., Gray, J., & Coles, B.(2008)。Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer。  new window
20.Sinicrope, P. S., Brockman, T. A., Patten, C. A., Frost, M. H., Vierkant, R. A., Petersen, L. R., et al.(2008)。Factors associated with breast cancer prevention communication between mothers and daughters。  new window
21.Underwood, S. M., Richards, K., Bradley, P. K., & Robertson, E.(2008)。Pilot study of the breast cancer experiences of African American women with a family history of breast cancer: Implications for nursing practice。  new window
22.Yin, L. Y., Wai, K. L., Chuan, T. N., & Guani, R. B. A.(2007)。Factors influencing women undertaking mammography in primary care in Singapore。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE