:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:北平行都司的設置、內徙及其影響
書刊名:政大史粹
作者:尤淑君
作者(外文):You, Shu-chun
出版日期:2011
卷期:20
頁次:頁1-50
主題關鍵詞:北平行都司大寧北邊邊防永樂皇帝兀良哈三衛Beiping XingdusiDaningDefense of northern frontierYongle EmperorWuliangha Sanwei
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:32
本文主旨,即探討北平行都司的設置、內徙及其影響,並分析明代北邊邊防敗壞的根本原因。全文分為三個部分。首先,討論洪武朝的國防策略與邊防布置,可知北平行都司在明初北邊邊防的地位,相當重要。其次,說明「靖難」對北平行都司的影響,可知北平行都司內徙的真正原因,即燕王朱棣發起「靖難」時,寧王響應,盡調北平行都司的兵力,支助燕王,卻讓大寧一地殘破不堪,無法再作為軍事重鎮,只好內徙。第三,分析北平行都司內徙的連鎖效應,可知北平行都司內徙保定後,大寧不再設防,兀良哈部得佔據大寧,讓遼東、宣府無法聯絡,也讓北京以北、西、東三邊防衛出現漏洞。此後,蒙古、女真得乘隙而入,不時騷擾,讓明政府顧此失彼,疲於奔命,也使九邊邊鎮左支右絀,難以協防。最終,明帝國的長城與邊鎮,仍檔不住八旗鐵騎,明朝遂亡於女真之手。
The proposed research is aimed to discuss the influences of the establishment of Beiping Xingdusi and its moving inward from Daning to Baoding in later years, and to reach a better understanding of the fundamental causes that corrupted the defense of Northern frontier in Ming Dynasty. This research consists of three sections. The first section of the paper, by looking into the defense strategy and border layout during the reign of Hongwu, shows the significant role Beiping xingdusi played in the defense of Northern frontier in early Ming Dynasty. The second section analyzes the impacts of the Jingnan Campaign (靖難) on Beiping xingdusi and the truth of relocating Beiping xingdusi in Baoding after the campaign. As what is observed, during the coup d'etat initiated by Zhu Di, the prince of Yan (燕王朱棣), in response to the call of Zhu di, the prince of Ning(寧王) sent all the forces of Beiping xingdusi to support him, leaving Daning unguarded. As a result, Daning was so severely damaged that it could not remain a strategic post after the campaign, and consequently resulted in the relocation of Beiping xingdusi. The last section deals with a series of chain reactions triggered by the relocation. Once the government moved Beiping xingdusi to Baoding, Wuliang habu(兀良哈部) took over Daning, which was then no longer fortified, and broke the communication between Liaodong (遼東) and Xuanfu (宣府). inevitably causing the defenses in north as well as in east and west of Peking to fall vulnerable to external forces. Henceforth, the Mongolians and the Manchus, recognizing the weakness of Ming authority in the north, invaded and harassed the border even more frequently, and made the Ming government and the nine border cities too exhausted to cope with the difficult situation. In the end, neither the Great Wall nor the border cities stood the attacks of the Eight Banner cavalry; the fate of the dynasty ended at the hand of the Manchus.
期刊論文
1.吳緝華(19810200)。論明代邊防內移與長城修築。東海大學歷史學報,4,25-47。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳緝華(19631200)。明初東勝的設防與棄防。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,34(下),649-660。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.于志嘉(20081200)。明北京行都督府考。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,79(4),683-747。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.范中義(1995)。明代九邊形成的時間。大同高等專科學校學報(綜合版),1995(4),25-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.Xu, Wei-dong(2004)。明代皇位繼承中的監國。明史研究論叢,6,501-510。  延伸查詢new window
6.Wu, Qi-hua(1980)。論明代邊防內移及影響。新亞學報,13,363-408。  延伸查詢new window
7.Xie, Zhao-zhi(2000)。五雜俎。四庫禁燬書叢刊. 子部,冊37。  延伸查詢new window
8.Wu, Qi-hua(1971)。明代皇室中的洽和與對立。明代制度史論叢,下,265-327。  延伸查詢new window
9.Li, Shu-fang(1936)。明代邊牆沿革史略。禹貢半月刊,5(1),3-17。  延伸查詢new window
10.Guo, Hong(2000)。大寧都司建置沿革考實。歷史地理,16,145-156。  延伸查詢new window
11.Tan, Qi-xiang(1972)。釋明代都司衛所制度。禹貢半月刊,3(10),459-464。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hagiwara, Junpei(1967)。明朝の政治體制。京都大學文學部研究紀要,11,49-125。  延伸查詢new window
13.Shimizu, Taiji(1918)。大寧都司の內徙につきて。東洋學報,8(1),125-141。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hsu, Hong(1982)。明洪武年間的人口移徙。臺北。235-293。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙現海(2005)。明代九邊軍鎮體制研究(博士論文)。東北師範大學,長春。  延伸查詢new window
2.Du, You-ning(2009)。從屯堡到邊牆——明代北邊防務研究。國立成功大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chen, Ling(1984)。明初北方邊防的經營與邊患的研究。中國文化大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張德信(2001)。明朝典章制度。長春:吉林文史出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文、黃彰健(1966)。明英宗實錄。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.孟森、包遵彭(1968)。明代邊防。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭曉、李致忠(1997)。今言。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊士奇(1966)。明太宗實錄。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭紅、靳潤成、周振鶴(2007)。中國行政區劃通史:明代卷。上海:復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊士奇(1966)。明宣宗實錄。中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.夏燮(1999)。明通鑑。長沙:岳麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
9.和田清、潘世憲(1984)。明代蒙古史論集。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.周振鶴(1990)。體國經野之道--新角度下的中國行政區劃沿革史。香港:中華書局有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃瑜、魏連科(1999)。雙槐歲鈔。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.談遷(1988)。國榷。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭曉(1997)。吾學編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.余英時(1987)。宋明理學與政治文化。台北:允晨文化。  延伸查詢new window
15.章潢(1983)。圖書編。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.顧祖禹、施和金、賀次君(2005)。讀史方輿紀要。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.谷應泰、中華書局(1977)。明史紀事本末。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.賴建誠(20080000)。邊鎮糧餉:明代中後期的邊防經費與國家財政危機,1531-1602。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張廷玉(1997)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.(1966)。明太祖實錄。明實錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Péng, Yong(2009)。明代北邊防禦體制研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
22.Hua, Xia-zi(1988)。明長城考實。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.Yang, Shou-qian(1993)。大寧考。中國野史集成。成都。  延伸查詢new window
24.Wang, Chong-wu(1992)。明靖難史事考證稿。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.Zhu, Hou-cong(1969)。敕議或問。記錄彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.Lu, Qiong(1985)。東戍見聞錄。(嘉靖)遼東志。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
27.Gu, Yan-wu(1981)。天下郡國利病書。四部叢刊廣編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
28.Li, Dong-yang、Shen, Ming-xing(1963)。大明會典。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
29.Lang, Ying(1965)。七修類稿。紀錄彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
30.Ma, Wen-sheng(1991)。撫安東夷記。叢書集成初編。北京。  延伸查詢new window
31.Li, Ting-ji(1962)。李文節文集.宣府鎮總圖說。明經世文編。北京。  延伸查詢new window
32.Gao, Dai(1965)。鴻猷錄。紀錄彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
33.Wan, Si-tong(1988)。新樂府。叢書集成續編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
34.Kawagoe, Yasuhiro(2003)。明代長城の群像。東京。  延伸查詢new window
35.Kawagoe, Yasuhiro(1997)。明代建文朝の史研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
36.松本隆晴(2001)。明代北邊防衛體制の研究。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
37.He, li(2005)。定都北京,歷史的選擇——論金及其後各朝均都北京的原因與意義。薊門集:北京建都850週年論文集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
38.Wu, Qi-hua(1971)。論明代封藩與軍事職權之轉移。明代制度史論叢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
39.Hibino, Takeo(1988)。居庸關の歷史地理。中國歷史地理研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
40.Tamura, Jitsuzou(1963)。明代の北邊防衛體制。明代滿蒙史研究。京都。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE