:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《奏讞書.獄簿》案例分析
書刊名:東吳中文學報
作者:周敏華
作者(外文):Chou, Min-hwa
出版日期:2011
卷期:21
頁次:頁29-53
主題關鍵詞:奏讞書南郡蒼梧郡奪爵戍邊縱囚新黔首ZouyanshuSouth prefectureCangwu prefectureStrip nobilityBorder conscriptionRelease prisonersNew people
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:115
《奏讞書•獄簿》為秦始皇二十七(220BC),蒼梧郡蒼梧縣利鄉發生叛變,為了消弭這場民變,中央遂指派已統治五十七年,且鄰近利鄉的南郡攸縣前往平叛。由於攸縣的令史義事先並未偵視敵情,導致徵召的新黔首,根本不敵叛民,仍需回攸縣再召集兩撥新黔首以應敵。帶領新黔首平叛的令史義,不幸在平叛役中陣亡,其餘的吏卒見勢,只得驚嚇的各自奔逃;前兩批的新黔首因無人統領,也只能攜帶器械而潛逃山林。攸縣縣令庫了解案情後,以為新黔首敗北逃亡,全是令史義等之過,故除了不忍依法將敗北的新黔首論處死罪外,也未將逃亡的新黔首緝捕歸案。攸縣縣令庫甚至上書,請求准允新黔首減刑為「奪爵戍邊」,這項違反秦時司法程式及執法原則的行徑,引起了御史的關注,而行文予南郡,要求審理此案。顯然此案所要審理的,除了應論罪的敗北新黔首外,最主要的還是不依法執法的攸縣縣令庫。此案最引發爭議者,莫過於御史何以要行文給南郡?及南郡所論攸縣縣令庫觸犯「縱囚」罪,其論處的依據何在?此外,秦始皇才剛一統天下,利鄉便出現叛民,顯示秦對新地域的統治實已發生困境。然新地域的統治困境何以會形成?〈嶽麓書院所藏秦簡〉之若干統治新黔首簡文,或可做為補充史料的重要文獻參考。
The ”Yubu” in Zouyanshu was written in 220 b.c. due to a rebellion that took place in a small town in Cangwu prefecture. In order to suppress the uprising, the imperial government dispatched officials from You county (in the South prefecture), which had been under its rule for 57 years. Yet, the clerk of the prefect, named Yi, in You county didn't first scout out the enemy forces, and as a result those he recruited were sympathetic to the rebels. Thus, he had to go back to You county twice to recruit enough ”new citizens” to combat the rebels. Unfortunately, Yi was killed in the fighting. So, when the government troops saw conditions weren’t favorable for them, they left in a fright. The two groups of new citizens were left without any leaders, and thereupon took their weapons and fled into the mountains and forests. When the You county magistrate learned of this incident, he concluded that Yi and the other officials were responsible for these new citizens fleeing. As such, he didn’t carry out the death penalty on these people, neither did he go and apprehend them. Instead, the You county magistrate, named Tui, sent a memorial requesting permission to alter the sentence of these ”new citizens” to that of ”striping them of nobility and sending them to the frontier for military service.” This was in direct violation of Qin civil law procedure, and as such caught the attention of the imperial censor, who sent an official decree to the South prefecture demanding they adjudicate this case. Clearly this case was less about the crime of these defeated troops and more about Tui who broke civil procedure. The most controversial aspect of the case was why the imperial censor would request the South prefecture to resolve the matter. Also, when Tui was found guilty of ”releasing prisoners” what was the legal basis? The First Emperor of Qin had just unified China. The people of Li's rebellion shows that Qin was experiencing some difficulties in ruling these new territories. What caused these difficulties? The bamboo slips regarding new citizens in the Qin Bamboo Slips at Yuelu Academy can be used to provide answers.
期刊論文
1.陳偉(2003)。秦蒼梧、洞庭二郡芻論。歷史研究,2003(5),168-172。  延伸查詢new window
2.李學勤(1993)。《奏讖書》解說。文物,1993(8),26-31。  延伸查詢new window
3.李均明(2002)。簡牘所反映的漢代訴訟關係。文史,2002(3),59-80。  延伸查詢new window
4.張建國(1997)。漢簡《奏讞書》和秦漢刑事訴訟程序初探。中外法學,1997(2),48-57。  延伸查詢new window
5.張建國(1997)。關於漢簡《奏讞書》的幾點研究及其他。國學研究,4,529-545。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐少華(2005)。從出土文獻析楚秦洞庭、黔中、蒼梧諸郡縣的建置與地望。考古,2005(11)。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡萬進(2007)。張家山漢簡《奏讞書》法律地位探析。南都學壇(人文社會科學學報),27(2)。  延伸查詢new window
8.李學勤(1995)。奏讞書解說下。文物,1995(3)。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳松長(2009)。嶽麓書院所藏秦簡綜述。文物,2009(3),75-88。  延伸查詢new window
10.程政舉(2007)。奏讞書所反映的先秦及秦漢時期的循實情斷案原則。法學論壇,6,143。  延伸查詢new window
11.Zhong, Wei、晏昌貴(2008)。楚秦洞庭蒼梧及源流演變107。  延伸查詢new window
12.CAI, Wan-jin(2008)。秦「所取荊新地」與蒼梧郡設置。鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版),41(5)。  延伸查詢new window
13.YU, Zhen-bo(2009)。秦律令中的「新黔首」與「新地吏」3。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lin, Jianming(1983)。秦漢時代的丞相和御史:居延漢簡解讀筆記。蘭州大學學報,3。  延伸查詢new window
15.Li, Xueqin(1995)。談奏讞書中秦代和東周時期的案例。文物,3。  延伸查詢new window
16.Gao, Min(1981)。秦律所反映的訴訟、審訊和量刑制度。鄭州大學學報,3。  延伸查詢new window
17.LIU, Xiang-ming(2004)。張家山漢簡奏讞書所見漢初對官吏犯罪的懲處。嘉應學院學報(哲學社會科學)。  延伸查詢new window
18.WANG, Huan-lin(2004)。里耶秦簡釋地。社會科學戰線,3。  延伸查詢new window
19.Yang, Zongbing(2004)。里耶秦簡縣「守」、「丞」、「守丞」同義説。北方論叢,6=188。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.He, Youzu(2005)。張家山漢簡二年律令之賊律、盜律、告律、捕律、復律、興律、徭律諸章集釋。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.wang, Huan-lin(2007)。里耶秦簡校詁。北京:中國文聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳壽、裴松之、陳乃乾(1982)。三國志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.張建國(1999)。帝制時代的中國法。北京:法律出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭浩、陳偉、工藤元男(2007)。二年律令與奏讞書--張家山二四七號漢書出土法律文獻釋讀。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.張建國(1997)。兩漢魏晉法制簡說。鄭州:大象出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.班固、顏師古(1962)。漢書。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.司馬遷、裴駰、司馬貞、張守節(1982)。史記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gao, Hen(2009)。秦漢簡牘中法制文書輯考。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.VII Zhangjiashan twenty-four Han finishing group(2001)。張家山漢墓竹簡• 二年律令。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.Tomb Shuihudi bamboo finishing group(2001)。睡虎地秦墓竹簡•封診式•封守。北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.范曄、李賢、司馬彪、楊家駱(1965)。後漢書。楚王英傳。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top