:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:道德生活主體與公民教育
書刊名:大葉大學通識教育學報
作者:蕭揚基 引用關係唐瓊妹
作者(外文):Shiau, Young-keyTang, Chiung-mei
出版日期:2011
卷期:7
頁次:頁145-168
主題關鍵詞:主體主體性道德公民教育SubjectSubjectivityMoralCivic education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:23
摘 要 本文探究主旨在增進公民教育的教學效能,以培育學生成為道德生活主體。現行公民教育與社會發展的諸多不適應之處,筆者認為根本問題在於個體主體性價值的喪失。傳統上,公民教育較偏重於政治化、工具化,片面強調社會適應性,而忽視主體性。因而,把學生視為純粹的教育客體,使他們處於被動服從的學習地位。展望公民教育改革與任務,根本的出路在於培育學生成為道德生活主體。 就公民教育實施而言,應注重學生的主體性,承認和尊重學生的主體地位和主體人格,並在培養與提高學生的自主性、能動性、創造性等個體主體性的基礎上,引導學生自覺地成爲社會活動的主體。
Abstract This study aims to increase the teaching effectiveness of civic education to nurture students to become the subjects of the moral life. Many of the existing civic education and social development was inadaptable.The author believed that the fundamental problem was the loss of individual subjective value. Traditionally, civic education attached more importance to politicalization, instrumentalization, and put more emphasis on social adaptation but ignored subjectivity. Therefore students were considered as the pure objects of education, and the passive and obedient learners. Prospects for the task and the reform of civic education, the fundamental way was to nurture students to become the subject of the moral life. Civic education should focus on the students’ subjectivity. It should recognize and respect for the subjectivity status and the subjectivity character of students. On the basis of the individual subjectivity to nurture and enhancestudents’ autonomy, activity, and creativity; and then to guide students consciously become the subjects of social activities.
期刊論文
1.郭湛(1987)。人的主體性進程。中國社會科學,2,55-64。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hahn, C. L.(1998)。Becoming political: Comparative perspectives on citizenship education。New York, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
2.張天寶(1999)。主體性教育。北京市:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cogan, John J.、Derricott, Ray(1998)。Citizenship for the 21st century: An international perspective on education。London:Kogan。  new window
4.孫效智(1999)。當宗教與道德相遇。臺北:臺灣書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Ichilov, O.(1998)。Citizenship and citizenship education in a changing world。London:Woburn Press。  new window
6.馮朝霖、薛化元(1997)。主體性與教育權。教育改革的民間觀點 \\ 林本炫 (主編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃 崴(1997)。主體性教育論。貴陽。  延伸查詢new window
8.瞿葆奎、吳慧珠、蔣曉(1991)。教育學文集(11):課外校外活動。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.豐子義(1994)。主體論--新時代新體制呼喚新人類。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kennedy, Kerry(1997)。Citizenship education and the modern state。London。  new window
11.Leicester, M.、Modigil, C.、Modigil, S.(2000)。Politics, Education and Citizenship。London。  new window
12.Montgomery, John D.(1997)。Values in education: Social capital formation in Asia and the Pacific。New Hamsphire。  new window
13.Torney-Purta, Judith、John Schwille、Jo-Ann Amadeo(1999)。Mapping the distinctive common features of civic education in twenty-four countries。Civic education across countries: twenty-four national case studies from the IEA civic education project \\ Judith Torney-Purta ; John Schwille ; Jo-Ann Amadeo (eds.)。Amsterdam。  new window
其他
1.冀劍制(2011)。「主體性」不是主觀的。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE