:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高中職英語教師多元評量實施現況之研究:以臺中縣市為例
書刊名:弘光學報
作者:楊存莉郭玲均曾舜慈張蕙芬
作者(外文):Yang, Tsun-lihKuo, Ling-chunZeng, Shun-cihChang, Hui-fen
出版日期:2011
卷期:64
頁次:頁111-125
主題關鍵詞:多元評量高中職英語教育第二語言教學英語教學Multiple assessmentVocational/senior high school English educationSecond language educationEnglish-as-a-foreign-language educationEFL education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:29
近年英語評量趨勢提倡以多元評量方式來評估學生的學習狀況,因此英語老師如何使用多元評量為一重要之研究課題。然對於臺灣高中職英語教師實施多元評量之實證研究闕如。因此,本研究針對目前高中職英語教師的多元評量施行現況作深入探討。研究樣本包含台中縣市58位高中職英語教師參與紙筆問卷調查,資料分析後以描述性統計資料呈現。研究結果顯示各種評量類型的使用多寡頻率有明顯差異。在傳統評量各項類型中,使用選擇題和填充題的頻率比其他題型高;在另類評量中,最常使用的為非正式提問與觀察。本文提出數個重要可能的影響因素,例如外來標準化測驗、班級學生人數、學生年齡及知識程度、家長態度、評量資源、教師的評量專業知能等,並針對教學實務和未來研究的方向提出建議,期研究結果對於高中職英語教師的評量實施現況及學生英語學習有所助益。
Recent educational trends promote multiplism approach to evaluate student learning. Teachers´ use of multiple assessments has been an important research issue. However, how multiple assessments have been implemented by senior high school EFL teachers remains unknown. This study explores senior high school EFL teachers´ multiple assessment practices. The sample consists of 58 vocational/senior high school EFL teachers in Taichung. Survey method and descriptive statistics analysis are employed. The results show that the frequency of each test technique used varied to a great extent. In traditional assessment, multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions were used more often than others. While in alternative assessment, the more often used tasks were informal questioning and informal observations. A number of potential factors for these practices are proposed, such as external large-scale testing, class size, students´ age and levels, parents´ attitude, assessment resources, teacher assessment competency and so on. Pedagogical implications and recommendations for future research are provided to facilitate EFL teachers´ informed implementation of multiple assessments as well as students´ English learning.
期刊論文
1.Green, K. E.、Stager, S. F.(1987)。Differences in teacher test and item use with subject, grade level taught, and measurement coursework。Teacher Education & Practice,4(1),55-61。  new window
2.Green, K. E.、Stager, S. F.(1987)。Testing: Coursework, attitudes, and practices。Educational Research Quarterly,11(2),48-55。  new window
3.Gullickson, A. R.(1984)。Teacher perspectives of their instructional use of tests。Journal of Educational Research,77(4),244-248。  new window
4.柳雅梅(2002)。檔案評量在高職英文戲劇教學運用之個案研究。師大學報.教育類,47(2),159-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳亮伃(20020600)。如何落實多元評量--專訪稻江科技暨管理學院郭生玉校長。教育研究,98,11-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lynch, Brian K.(2001)。Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective。Language Testing,18(4),351-372。  new window
7.楊存莉(20081100)。EFL Teachers' Multiple Classroom Assessment Practices of Young Language Learners。弘光人文社會學報,9,139-176。new window  new window
學位論文
1.Granados, A. R.(2004)。Standards-based classroom assessment for foreign language in North Carolina public high schools: A statewide survey of teachers(博士論文)。University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill。  new window
2.Greenstein, L.(2004)。Finding balance in classroom assessment: High school teachers' knowledge and practice(博士論文)。Johnson & Wales University。  new window
3.陳秀美(2003)。國小英語教師多元評量信念與實施概況研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳秀美(2003)。A study of primary school English teachers' beliefs and practices in multiple assessments: A case study in Taipei City(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北。  new window
圖書
1.Gillham, B.(2000)。Developing a questionnaire。London:Continuum。  new window
2.McMillan, J. H.(2007)。Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standardized-based instruction。Boston, MA:Pearson/Allyn & Bacon。  new window
3.Stiggins, R. J.(2001)。Student-involved Classroom Assessment。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/ Prentice Hall。  new window
4.教育部(2008)。普通高級中學必修科目「英文」課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Airasian, Peter W.(2005)。Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. 5th edition。New York:McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Mertler, C. A.(1998)。Classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers(ED428085)。  new window
其他
1.邱靖雅(2006)。運用合作評量與團體獎勵於線上寫作與合作評量系統對高中生英語寫作成效與態度之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2008)。職業學校群科課程綱要--英文領域。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭鳳美(2005)。國小英語教師如何實施多元評量之個案觀察研究--以一位台南市國小英語教師為例。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳玉美(2006)。多元英語課室評量:一個師生學習發展的行動研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳秋蘭(2005)。以多元評量提昇學生英語學習動機。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.楊存莉(2008a)。英語教師實施多元教室評量之現況探究。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊存莉(2008b)。影響國小英語教師實施多元課室評量之因素探究。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊政坤(2004)。國小英語學習檔案評量網路系統之設計與實施成效。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡媛琪(2004)。寫作檔案評量運用於高中英語教學之研究。  延伸查詢new window
10.魏毓瑩(2006)。國中英語教師多元評量實施現況之研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.Alsarimi, A. M.(2000)。Classroom assessment and gradding practices in the sultanate of Oman。  new window
12.Chan, Y. C.(2007)。Elementary school EFL teachers´ beliefs and practices of multiple assessments in the northern Taiwan。  new window
13.Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H.(2004)。ESL/EFL instructor’s classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures。  new window
14.Hsu, Y. K.(2005)。Developing and researching multiple assessment: An action research。  new window
15.Shohamy, E.(1998)。Alternative Assessment in Language Testing: Applying a Multiplism Approach。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nunan, D.(2010)。Teaching English to young Learners: Theory, Research and Practice。The Program Book and Collection of papers from the Invited Speakers and Winners of Paper Awards。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE