臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：治理「文化治理」：傅柯、班奈特與王志弘
書刊名：臺灣社會研究季刊
作者：吳彥明
作者(外文)：Wu, Yen-ming
出版日期：2011
卷期：82
頁次：頁171-204
主題關鍵詞：治理性；文化治理；文化政治；傅柯；Governmentality；Cultural governance；Cultural politics；Foucault
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:131
  • 點閱點閱:186
就理論或是實踐的層面上，傅柯本人並沒有正面發想「文化治理」這個概念，主要是涉及政治上的自由主義以及新自由主義，而這也是現有文獻著力甚深的面向。當然，傅柯或多或少也指涉了宗教、家庭、性別以及主體建構的治理，但「文化」這個字彙始終不在他或是目前主流治理性文獻的理論議程之中。歐美學術圈之所以會有「文化治理」的概念，當然是受到Tony Bennett的影響甚鉅，而在台灣的人文社會學科之中，論及「文化治理」的討論，王志弘一系列的作品也必然是對話的對象。因此本文的書寫策略就是從傅柯、Bennett與王志弘三位學者的著作來依序進行討論。總的來說，本文試圖想做的，並非是對傅柯式的「治理性」或是Bennett的「文化治理」這兩個概念進行系譜學的分析，畢竟前者已有學者多有著墨了，後者目前也有一些退燒了；而是，在他們的基礎上，試圖對「文化治理」在台灣這個既是研究領域也是研究方法的概念進行反思與檢討。 本文發現，傅柯本身有三種版本的治理性解讀。而Bennett與王志弘兩位學者，基於不同的學術生產脈絡，對於文化治理的理論化工程則是大相逕庭，前者主動與傅柯進行對話，對於文化治理的理論化比較偏向傅柯第二版本的治理性，並將文化治理與文化政治切割開來；而後者基於與都市治理研究的對話成果，則是認為文化治理與文化政治兩者是相互指涉的。鑑於以上這點，本文作者進一步指出，文化治理在台灣的理論化工程是發散而不明確的，無法突顯出文化與治理之間的歷史性與理論關係性。
Theoretically or practically, Foucault himself didn't elaborate the “cultural governance”. Rather, both his main focus and the current literature are linked to the liberalism and neo-liberalism. Without any question, Foucault more or less referred to the government of religion, family, gender and subject, but the “cultural”is eventually excluded from his or mainstream theoretical agenda. Tony Bennett enacted the “cultural governance” as a research agenda. And in Taiwan, the pilot scholar was Chih-hung Wang. Therefore, logically, the author tries to elaborate the “cultural governance” based on these three scholars' writings sequentially. In doing so, this article's main problematic is to introspect and criticize the “cultural governance” as a rising sub-field of cultural studies or sociology in Taiwan. This article concludes that Foucault himself had three distinct but intrinsically related versions of governmentality. Bennett and Chih-hung Wang, based on different intellectual context, theorized two contrasted versions of cultural governance. Bennett actively involved and dialogued with Foucault, his interpretation contrasted the cultural governance with cultural politics and was much more linked to the second version of Foucault. Conversely, Chih-hung Wang, who was trained in urban governance and political economy school, argued that cultural governance and cultural politics is mutual-reference. Accordingly, the author argues that the theorization of cultural governance in Taiwan is blurring and defocusing, unable to the highlight the historical-ness and theoretical connection between culture and governmentality.
期刊論文
1.王志弘、沈孟穎(20060600)。誰的「福爾摩沙」？--展示政治、國族工程與象徵經濟。東吳社會學報，20，1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bennett, T.(2000)。Acting on the social: art, culture, and government。The American Behavioral Scientists，43(9)，1412-1428。  new window
3.廖世璋(20021000)。國家治理下的文化政策：一個歷史回顧。建築與規劃學報，3(2)，160-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Foucault, Michel(1982)。The subject and power。Critical Inquiry，8(4)，777-795。  new window
5.姚人多(20020500)。傅柯[Michel Foucault]的工具箱--國家篇。當代，59=177，84-95。  延伸查詢new window
6.柯朝欽(20050400)。生命政治與主權決斷--「治理性」與「例外狀態」的比較。當代，94=212，36-55。  延伸查詢new window
7.林淑芬(20040300)。傅柯論權力與主體。人文及社會科學集刊，16(1)，117-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bennett, T.(2005)。Civic laboratories: museums, cultural objecthood and the governance of the social。Cultural Studies，19(5)，521-547。  new window
9.姚人多(20031200)。傅柯、殖民主義、與後殖民文化研究。臺灣社會學，6，223-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.古明君(20081200)。文物之用？：中國文物體制的形構與轉變。臺灣社會學，16，149-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Rose, Nikolas、O'Malley, Pat、Valverde, Mariana(2006)。Governmentality。Annual Review of Law and Social Science，2，83-104。  new window
12.王志弘(20031200)。臺北市文化治理的性質與轉變1967-2002。臺灣社會研究季刊，52，121-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王志弘(20050200)。記憶再現體制的構作：臺北市官方城市書寫之分析。中外文學，33(9)=393，9-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王志弘(20050600)。地方意象、地域意義與再現體制：1990年代以降的文山地區。臺灣社會研究，58，135-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.王志弘(2003)。影像城市與都市意義的文化生産：《台北畫刊》之分析。城市與設計學報，13/14，13/14。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳彥明(2011)。「社會」出代誌？另一種社會想像。文化研究月報，114，2-21。  延伸查詢new window
17.Lemke, T.(2001)。'The birch of bib-politics'：Michel Foucault's lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality。Economy and Society，30(2)，190-207。  new window
18.Luckhurst, R.(2003)。Cultural governance, New Labour, and the British SF Boom。Science Fiction Studies，30(3)，4l7-435。  new window
19.Lemke, T.(2007)。An indigestible meal? Foucault, goverruriencality and state theory。Distinktion：Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory，15。  new window
20.Dillon, M.、Valentine, J.(2002)。Introduction：Culture and Governance。Cultural Values，6(l/2)，35-9。  new window
21.Yue, A.(2006)。Tlie regional culture of new Asia cultural governance and creative industries in Singapore。Imernational Journal of Cultural Policy，72(1)，17-33。  new window
22.Bang, H. P.(2004)。Culture governance：governing self-reflexive modernity。Public Administration，82(1)，157-190。  new window
23.Bennett, T.(1992)。Useful culture。Cultural Studies，6(3)，395-408。  new window
24.Bennett, T.(2002)。Archaeological Autopsy：Objectifying Time and Cultural Governance。Cultural Values，6(1/2)，29-47。  new window
25.Bennett, T.(2007)。The work of culture。Ctdtural Sociology，1(l)，31-47。  new window
26.Bennett, T.(2007)。Making culture, changing society：the perspective of culture studies。Cultural Studies，22(4/5)，610-629。  new window
27.Donzeloc, J.、Gordon, C.(2008)。Governing Liberal Societies：the Foucault Effect in the English? speaking World。Foucault Studies，5，48-62。  new window
28.Eiden, S.(2007)。Rethinking governmentality。Political Geography，26，29-33。  new window
29.Foucault, M.(1993)。About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self：Two Lectures at Dartmouth。Political Theory，22(2)，198-227。  new window
30.Gane, Mike(2008)。Foucault on governmentality and liberalism。Theory, Culture & Society，25(7/8)，353-363。  new window
31.Jin, Huimin(2008)。The intellectual genealogies and possible futures of cultural studies：an interview with Tony Bennett。Cultural Politics，4(2)，161-l82。  new window
32.Tierney, T. F.(2008)。Review essay。Foucault Studies，5，90-100。  new window
會議論文
1.王志弘(2009)。文化治理：一個城市研究概念的探討。第一屆城市學研究學術研討會。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳彥明、沈岱樺(2007)。矛盾（或衝突）即是轉機？「文化」政策與文化「政策」的論辯。高雄。361-377。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lemke, T.(2000)。Foucault, governmentality, and critique。  new window
研究報告
1.王志弘(2006)。都市社會運動與文化治理：1990年代迄今的台北經驗。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.王志弘(2003)。1990年代台北市的文化治理：庶民記億、地方塑造與節慶奇観。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Foucault, Michel、Senellhart, Michael、Burchill, Graham(2007)。Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1954-1984。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
2.畢恆達(2005)。教授為什麼沒告訴我？論文寫作的枕邊書。臺北市：學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bennett, Tony(1998)。Culture: A Reformer's Science。Sage。  new window
4.Foucault, Michel、Bertani, Mauro、Fontana, Alessandro、Macey, David(2003)。"Society Must be Defended": lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976。Picador。  new window
5.Dean, M.(2010)。Governmentality : power and rule in modern society。Los Angles, Calif.：London：SAGE。  new window
6.詹姆斯‧米勒、高毅(1995)。傅柯的生死愛慾。臺北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Wynne, D.(1992)。The Culture Industry: The Arts in Urban Regeneration。Ashgate Publishing Company。  new window
8.Bennett, Tony(1995)。The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics。Routledge。  new window
9.Gros, Frédéric、龔卓軍、楊凱麟、何乏筆(2006)。傅柯考。麥田。  延伸查詢new window
10.Foucault, Michel、Gros, Frédéic、Ewald, François、Fontana, Alessandro、Burchell, Graham(2005)。The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981-1982。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
11.Morris, M.、Patton, P.(1979)。Michel Foucault：Power, Truth, Strategy。Sydney：Feral Publications。  new window
12.鐘宜樺(2006)。文化進站：文化公民的12堂課。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.謝強、馬月(2007)。知識考古學。北京：三聯。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bennett, T.(2003)。Culture and governmenrality。Foucault, Cultural Studies, and Govrnmentality。Albany。  new window
15.Bennett, T.(2010)。'Culture studies' and ehe culture complex。Handbook of Cultural Sociology。Oxon。  new window
16.Brown, W.(1998)。Genealogical polirics。The Later Foucault：Politics and Philosophy。London。  new window
17.Gordon, C.(1980)。Afterword。Power/Knowledge。New York。  new window
18.Keenan, T.(1995)。Foucault on government。Michel Foucault：Critical Assessment IV。London。  new window
19.Callahan, W. A.(2006)。Cultural Governance and Resistance in Pacific Asia。London。  new window
20.Dean, M.(2003)。Culture governance and individualisation。Governance as social and political communication。UK and New York。  new window
21.Foucault, M.(1988)。Politics and Reason。Michel Foucault：Politics, Philosophy, Culture。London。  new window
22.Foucault, M.(1988)。Truth, power, self：an interview with Michel Foucault by Rux Martin。Technologies of the Self. A seminar with Michel Foucault。Amhersc。  new window
23.Foucault, M.(1991)。Quesrions of method。The Foucault Effect：Studies in Governmentality。Hemel Hempstead。  new window
24.Foucault, M.(1996)。What our present is。Foucault Live。New York。  new window
25.Foucault, M.(1997)。On the government of the living。Ethics：Subjectivity and Truth。New York。  new window
26.Foucault, M.(2003)。So is it important to think?。The Essential Foucault。New York。  new window
27.Foucault, M.(2003)。Truth and power。The Essential Foucault。New York。  new window
28.Rabinow, P.(1984)。Introduction。The Foucault Reader。Harmondsworth。  new window
29.Shapiro, M.(2004)。Methods and Nations：Cultural Governance and the Indigenous Subject。New York and London。  new window
30.Foucault, M.(2008)。The Birth of Biopolitics at the College de France 1978-1979。New York。  new window
31.Miller, T.(1998)。Technologies of Truth：Cultural Citizenship and the Popular Media。London。  new window
32.Packer, J.(2003)。Mapping the Intersections of Foucault and Cultural Studies ：An Interview with Lawrence Grossberg and Toby Miller。Foucault, Cultural Studies, and Govemmentaliiy。Albany。  new window
33.Perri 6(1997)。Governing by Cultures。Life after Politics：New Thinking for the Twenty-first Century。London。  new window
34.吳彥明(2007)。政治如同一種通俗文化：一個文化霸權的觀點。中華傳播學會 2007年會論文。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Foucault, M.(1997)。Subjectivity and truth。Michel Foucault: Ethics, the essential works。London：Allen Lane。  new window
2.蘇峰山(1996)。傅柯對於權力之分析。歐洲社會理論。臺北市：中央研究院歐美研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Foucault, Michel(1988)。The Political Technology of Individuals。Technologies of the Self。Am-herst：University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
4.Harvey, D.(2001)。From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformatiom in urban governance in late capitalism。Space of Capital: Toward a Critical Geography。Edinburgh：New York：Edinburgh University Press：Routledge。  new window
5.Gordon, Colin(1991)。Governmental Rationality: An Introduction。The Foucault Effect: Studies in Govemmentality。London：Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
6.Burchell, Graham(1996)。Liberal government and techniques of the self。Foucault and political reason: liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Foucault, Michel(1988)。Technologies of the Self。Technologies Of The Self: A Seminar With Michel Foucault。Amherst, MA：University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
8.Foucault, Michel(1991)。Governmentality。The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Bennett, Tony(1992)。Putting policy into cultural studies。Cultural Studies。Routledge。  new window
10.Foucault, M.(1997)。The ethics of concern for self as a practice of freedom。Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth。New York：The New Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：908（臺灣：906，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67706282
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上