:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:結合情境與情緒:人機互動理論沿革與發展
書刊名:傳播與管理研究
作者:周書暉林佑全
作者(外文):Zhou, Shu-huiLin, Yo-quan
出版日期:2011
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁29-68
主題關鍵詞:使用情境活動理論情緒設計資訊處理使用者經驗Activity theoryContextEmotional designInformation processingUser experience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
《摘要》 《摘要》 《摘要》 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 綜覽人機互動的理論發展與流變,源自於認知心學提供基礎藉以瞭 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 解使用者的認知模式,將人類資訊處理視作電腦號過程主要探討任務 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 執行時資訊在人類與機器之間的傳遞,藉以形塑使用者概念模式。然而過去 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 人機互動研究引用認知心理學取徑時,多數僅限於探討使者如何處介面資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 訊,忽略人們如何在所身處的環境與其他互動以及電腦外資 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 源進行互動,以致於依賴使用性問題作為設計決策無法確切瞭解者在真實 環境中 x所面臨到的問題。 所面臨到的問題。 所面臨到的問題。 所面臨到的問題。 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 另一方面,傳統人機互動研究關注產品功能和使用者 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 效能的局限性,導致忽略情緒經驗互動議題。 本文根據活動理論 本文根據活動理論 本文根據活動理論 (activity theory) (activity theory)(activity theory) (activity theory) 以及 Norman Norman所提出的情緒設計 所提出的情緒設計 所提出的情緒設計 (emotional design) (emotional design) (emotional design) 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 觀點,嘗試為人機互動研究提出未來建議。應 結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性結合情緒與經驗的 理論概念,擴張認知層次至。運用活動全觀性觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 觀點,探索情境影響之下各元素相互作用所形塑的意義詮釋。與此同時將緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 因素納入社會互動的考量層面,分析使用者對於產品、系統或介所引發情緒 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 反應,瞭解社會互動所形塑的情緒意義藉此 建構使用者經驗的全貌。 建構使用者經驗的全貌。 建構使用者經驗的全貌。 建構使用者經驗的全貌。 建
《Abstract》 In the oIn the o In the oIn the o In the overview verview verview verview verview of the developmentthe development the developmentthe development the development the development the development and evolution of human evolution of human evolution of human evolution of humanevolution of human evolution of humanevolution of human evolution of humanevolution of human evolution of human -computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction computer interaction research,research, research,research, research, thethe cognitive p cognitive p cognitive pcognitive pcognitive pcognitive p cognitive psychology sychology sychology sychology provides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to underprovides a theoretical basis to under provides a theoretical basis to under stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's stand the user's cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and cognitive model. For exploring the information transferred between humans and machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, machines while implementing the task, the the the cognitive approach cognitive approach cognitive approachcognitive approachcognitive approachcognitive approach cognitive approach cognitive approachcognitive approach cognitive approach regards regards regards regards regards human human human information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as information processing as a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage a critical stage of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's of signal processing to shape the user's co nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. nceptual model. However,However, However, However, However, nowadays nowadays nowadays nowadays human computer interaction studies human computer interaction studies human computer interaction studies human computer interaction studies human computer interaction studies human computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studies human computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studies human computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studies human computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studies human computer interaction studieshuman computer interaction studies employing employing employing employing employing employing thethe cognitivecognitive cognitive cognitivecognitivecognitivecognitive psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which psychology, which is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how is limited to discuss how deal with deal with deal withdeal withdeal withdeal withdeal with the information the information the information the information the information the information the information the information the information the information the information the information of user interface, of user interface,of user interface, of user interface,of user interface,of user interface,of user interface, of user interface, of user interface,of user interface, of user interface,of user interface, ignoringignoringignoring ignoringignoring how people how peoplehow people how people interactinteract interactinteractinteractinteract with other people and resourcewith other people and resourcewith other people and resourcewith other people and resource with other people and resource with other people and resource with other people and resourcewith other people and resourcewith other people and resource with other people and resource with other people and resource with other people and resourcewith other people and resourcewith other people and resource with other people and resource s in the the the the env ironmentironmentironment ironment . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, . That is to say, employing employing employing employing employing employing the usabilitythe usability the usability the usabilitythe usabilitythe usabilitythe usabilitythe usabilitythe usability as a as aas a design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot design guideline cannot realize therealize the realize therealize therealize therealize the realize therealize therealize the problem problem problemproblem s which the s which thes which the s which the s which thes which thes which the user users would s woulds would s woulds would face in the real world.face in the real world.face in the real world. face in the real world.face in the real world.face in the real world. face in the real world.face in the real world.face in the real world. face in the real world.face in the real world. face in the real world.face in the real world.face in the real world.face in the real world. face in the real world.face in the real world. On the other handOn the other hand On the other handOn the other hand On the other handOn the other handOn the other hand On the other handOn the other handOn the other hand , the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional the traditional human human -computer computercomputercomputer computer interactioninteractioninteractioninteractioninteractioninteraction interactioninteractioninteractioninteraction researchresearch researchresearch research es focufocu sing sing on product features and product features and product features and product features andproduct features andproduct features andproduct features and product features andproduct features andproduct features and product features andproduct features and its its its its performance performanceperformanceperformanceperformanceperformanceperformance performance, leading , leading, leading , leading, leading, leading thethethe researchresearchresearch researchresearchresearch ersersers to to overlook overlook overlookoverlook thethethe interactioninteractioninteractioninteraction interaction interactioninteractioninteraction issues aboutissues about issues about issues about issues about issues about human human human emotional emotional emotionalemotional experience. experience.experience.experience. experience.
期刊論文
1.Engeström, Y.(2000)。Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work。Ergonomics,43(7),960-974。  new window
2.Leont'ev, A. N.(1974)。The problem of activity in psychology。Soviet Psychology,13(2),4-33。  new window
3.Bilal, D.、Bachir, I.(2007)。Children's interaction with cross-cultural and multilingual digital libraries. II. Information seeking, success, and affective experience。Information processing & management,43(1),65-80。  new window
4.David, D.、Miclea, M.、Opre, A.(2004)。The information-processing approach to the human mind: Basics and beyond。Journal of Clinical Psychology,60(4),353-368。  new window
5.Guiard, Y.、Beaudouin-Lafon, M.(2004)。Preface: Fitts' law 50 years later: Applications and contributions from human-computer interaction。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,61(6),750。  new window
6.Logan, G.(2004)。Cumulative progress in formal theories of attention。Annual review of Psychology,55(1),207-234。  new window
7.Nahl, D.(2004)。Measuring the affective information environment of web searchers。Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,41(1),191-197。  new window
8.Nardi, B.(1998)。Concepts of cognition and consciousness: Four voices。ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation,22(1),31-48。  new window
9.Nardi, B. A.(1998)。Activity theory and its use within human-computer interaction: Response to Jeremy Roschelle's review of Context and Consciousness。Journal of the Learning Sciences,7(2),257-261。  new window
10.Norman, D. A.、Ortony, A.、Russell, D. M.(2003)。Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines。IBM Systems Journal,42(1),38-44。  new window
11.Partala, T.、Surakka, V.(2004)。The effects of affective interventions in human computer interaction。Interacting with Computers,16(2),295-309。  new window
12.Picard, R.、Klein, J.(2002)。Computers that recognise and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications。Interacting with computers,14(2),141-169。  new window
13.Tzeng, J. Y.(2004)。Toward a more civilized design: studying the effects of computers that apologize。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,61(3),319-345。  new window
14.Ward, R. D.、Marsden, P. H.(2003)。Physiological responses to different WEB page designs。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,59(1/2),199-212。  new window
15.Hassenzahl, M.(2004)。Emotions can be quite ephemeral; we cannot design them。interactions,11(5),46-48。  new window
16.Hudlicka, E.(2003)。To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,59(1/2),1-32。  new window
17.Kaptelinin, V.、Nardi, B.、Macaulay, C.(1999)。Methods & tools: The activity checklist: a tool for representing the space of context。interactions,6(4),27-39。  new window
18.Law, E. L. C.、Van Schaik, P.(2010)。Editorial: Modelling user experience-An agenda for research and practice。Interacting with Computers,22(5),313-322。  new window
19.Bedny, G. Z.、Harris, S. R.(2005)。The Systemic-Structural Theory of Activity: Applications to the Study of Human Work。Mind, Culture & Activity,12(2),128-147。  new window
20.Bedny, G. Z.、Karwowski, W.(2004)。Activity theory as a basis for the study of work。Ergonomics,47(2),134-153。  new window
會議論文
1.Cluts, M.(2003)。The evolution of artifacts in cooperative work: constructing meaning through activity。Florida, USA。  new window
2.Dumais, S.、Czerwinski, M.(2001)。Building bridges from theory to practice。New Orleans, LA, USA。  new window
3.Buur, J.、Bodker, S.(2000)。From usability lab to 'design collaboratorium': reframing usability practice。New York, USA。  new window
4.Hornof, A.、Halverson, T.(2003)。Cognitive strategies and eye movements for searching hierarchical computer displays。Lauderdale, Florida, USA。  new window
5.Bodker, S.(2006)。When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges。Oslo, Norway。  new window
6.Boehner, K.、DePaula, R.、Dourish, P.、Sengers, P.(2005)。Affect: from information to interaction。Aarhus, Denmark。  new window
7.Obrist, M.、Tscheligi, M.、de Ruyter, B.、Schmidt, A.(2010)。Contextual user experience: how to reflect it in interaction designs?。Atlanta, GA, USA。  new window
8.Arapakis, I.、Jose, J. M.、Gray, P. D.(2008)。Affective feedback: An investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process。Singapore。  new window
9.Laarni, J.(2004)。Aesthetic and emotional evaluations of computer interfaces。Aarhus N:Department of computer science, University of AARHUS。28-30。  new window
10.Kuutti, K.(1991)。The concept of activity as a basic unit of analysis for CSCW research。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
11.Lopatovska, I.(2011)。Researching emotion: challenges and solutions。Seattle, WA, USA。  new window
12.Zaman, B.、Shrimpton-Smith, T.(2006)。The FaceReader: Measuring instant fun of use。Oslo, Norway。  new window
13.Gomez, R. E.、Popovic, V.、Blackler, A. L.(2010)。Emotional experience with portable health devices。Chicago, Ill。  new window
14.Mahlke, S.、Minge, M.、Thuring, M.(2006)。Measuring Multiple Components of Emotions in Interactive Contexts。Montréal, Québec, Canada。  new window
15.Mandryk, R. L.、Atkins, M. S.、Inkpen, K. M.(2006)。A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments。Montréal, Québec, Canada。  new window
16.Miller, D.(1981)。Depth/breadth tradoff in hierarchical computer menus。Rochester, NY, USA。  new window
17.Larson, K.、Czerwinski, M.(1998)。Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval。Los Angeles, CA, USA。  new window
18.Geven, A.、Tscheligi, M.、Noldus, L.(2009)。Measuring Mobile Emotions: Measuring the Impossible?。Bonn, Germany。  new window
學位論文
1.Lopatovska, I.(2009)。Emotional aspects of the online information retrieval process。State University of New Jersey,New Jersey。  new window
圖書
1.Winograd, Terry、Flores, Fernando(1986)。Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design。Norwood, N. J..:Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
2.Card, S. K.、Moran, T. P.、Newell, Allen(1983)。The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Sharp, Helen、Preece, Jenny、Rogers, Yvonne(2007)。Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Nardi, B. A.(1996)。Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Norman, Donald A.(2004)。Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) Everday Things。New York:Basic Book。  new window
7.Findlay, J.、Gilchrist, I.(2003)。Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing。New York。  new window
8.Blythe, M. A.、Overbeeke, K.、Monk, A. F.、Wright, P. C.(2003)。Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Press。  new window
9.Leont'ev, A.(1981)。Problems of the development of the mind。Moscow, Russia:Progress Publishers。  new window
10.Proctor, R.、Vu, K.(2006)。Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application。Boca Raton, FL, USA。  new window
11.Lindsay, P.、Norman, D.(1977)。An introduction to psychology。New York。  new window
12.Bertelsen O.(2006)。Tertiary artefactness at the interface。Aesthetic computing。Cambridge, MA。  new window
13.Tractinsky, N.、Zmiri, D.(2006)。Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI。Aesthetic computing。Boston, MA。  new window
14.Wright, P.、Blythe, M.、McCarthy, J.(2006)。User experience and the idea of design in HCI。Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification。Berlin。  new window
15.Bannon, L.(1991)。From human factors to human actors: The role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design。Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems。Hillsdale。  new window
16.Bertelsen, O.、Bodker, S.(2003)。Activity theory。HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science。Amsterdam。  new window
17.Hassenzahl, M.(2005)。The quality of interactive products: Hedonic needs, emotions and experience。Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction。Hershey, London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scherer, K. R.(1984)。On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach。Approaches to emotion。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.。  new window
2.Kuutti, K.(1996)。Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research。Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction。MIT Press。  new window
3.Brave, T.、Nass, C.(2002)。Emotion in human-computer interaction。The Human Computer Interaction Handbook。Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
4.Nardi, B.(1996)。Activity theory and human-computer interaction。Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
5.Landauer, T.(1990)。Relations between cognitive psychology and computer system design。Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
6.Kaptelinin, V.(1996)。Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction。Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE