:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:審議民主中的性別差異--2007年青年國是會議的經驗分析
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:張譽馨
作者(外文):Chang, Yu-hsin
出版日期:2010
卷期:27
頁次:頁275-316
主題關鍵詞:性別平等性別差異審議民主女性公共參與Gender differencesGender inequalityDeliberative democracyThe public participation of women
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:48
長久以來,女性參與公共領域始終面臨兩個問題,亦即她們容易被安排在競爭性弱或次要的職位,而且相較於男性,女性更不容易接近權力核心。審議民主作為新興的公民參與模式,能否突破上述兩個問題?本文主要想探討的是,審議民主是否存有性別差異和性別不平等?此外,女性如何在參與過程中發揮影響力?為了清楚瞭解女性實際參與的情形,作者以2007年青年國是會議為研究個案,透過影像紀錄來觀察並分析會議參與者的互動情形。另外,作者也深度訪談十一位參與者,試圖瞭解女性對於開會過程的主觀感受。研究結果發現,相較之下,女性的發言次數與意見都只有男性的二分之一,而且女性改變他人意見的比率也只有男性的三分之一,因此審議民主確實有性別差異和不平等的情形。此外,作者也發現,會議決策其實是由不同的「結盟」所形成,而這些結盟的領導者都是男性。參與結盟的女性,其發言比較容易獲得重視,而跑單幫的女性參與者即便擁有豐富知識,也不易與他人產生互動。因此,結盟一方面有助於提升女性影響力,另一方面也可能擠壓女性的影響力。最後,作者試著以Iris M. Young的排除概念(exclusion)解釋審議會議中,會議環境與結盟如何交織成性別不平等。
For a long time, women's public participation are confronted with two problems: firstly, they tend to be assigned to subordinate or less competitive positions. Secondly, compared with men, women have more difficulties in accessing the power center. Can the new model of public participation, deliberative democracy, solve the problems above? In this article, I want to discuss two questions: does deliberative democracy have the elements of gender differences and gender inequality? How do women influence the decision-making process? In order to understand the process of women's participation clearly, I did a case study of the 2007 Youth Forum by observing and analyzing the participants' interactions based on video recording. In addition, I interviewed in-depth 11 participants to know how they felt about the forum. Consequently, I found that women's participation was 50% less than men's, in terms of how many times they spoke up and how many points they made. In addition, the chances for women to change others' opinions were only one third of men's. As a result, gender differences and gender inequality still exist in deliberative democracy. Besides, I also found that the decision-making was formed by different "alliances," which were led by men, and only those women participating in the alliances could be treated seriously. On the contrary, even though being outstanding in terms of knowledge of certain issues, a woman excluded from the alliances would find it difficult to interact with others. Therefore, "alliances" did improve some women's influence on the one hand, while hampering the others' on the other hand. In conclusion, I try to explain how the interaction between alliances and the environment of the forum causes gender differences and gender inequality by employing Iris M. Young's concept of exclusion.
期刊論文
1.Schudson, M.(1997)。Why conversation is not the soul of democracy。Critical Studies in Mass Communication,14(4),297-309。  new window
2.楊婉瑩(200012)。婦女的政治機會結構析論。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,2(4),65-95。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾國祥(20041200)。憲政主義與民主的衝突:美國政治思想的一個側面。政治與社會哲學評論,11,35-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林祐聖(20070900)。我們沒有臺上臺下之分--代理孕母公民共識會議中的專家與常民關係。臺灣民主,4(3),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林國明(20090600)。國家、公民社會與審議民主:公民會議在臺灣的發展經驗。臺灣社會學,17,161-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃東益、施佳良、傅凱若(20070900)。地方公共審議說理過程初探:2005年宜蘭社大公民會議個案研究。公共行政學報,24,71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.杜文苓、陳致中(20070900)。民眾參與公共決策的反思--以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例。臺灣民主季刊,4(3),33-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃競涓(20080900)。女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判。臺灣民主季刊,5(3),33-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林國明、陳東升(20050900)。審議民主、科技決策與公共討論。科技、醫療與社會,3,1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gutmann, Amy、Dennis Thompson(2004)。Why Deliberative Democracy?。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.行政院青年輔導委員會(2007)。台灣的夢想從我們開始:北會議手冊(小冊子)。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.林國明(2007)。2007青年國是會議辦理成果報告。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Habermas, Jürgen(1990)。Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft。Suhrkamp Verlag。  new window
5.Mansbridge, Jane S.(1980)。Beyond Adversary Democracy。New York:Basic Books。  new window
6.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis、謝宗學、鄭惠文(2005)。商議民主。臺北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gilligan, Carol、王雅各(2002)。不同的語音:心理學理論與女性的發展。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Young, Iris Marion(2000)。Inclusion and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Gilligan, Carol(1982)。In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.曹衛東、王曉珪、劉北城、宋偉杰、Habermas, Jurgen(2002)。公共領域的結構轉型。台北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Young, Iris M.(1996)。Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy。Democracy and Difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Young, Iris Marion(2003)。Activist challenges to deliberative democracy。Debating Deliberative Democracy。Blackwell Publishing。  new window
3.Fraser, Nancy(1992)。Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy。Habermas and the Public Sphere。MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE