期刊論文| 1. | 尹守信(20061200)。由Agfa v. Creo案談美國專利法上之揭露義務。智慧財產權，96，66-91。 延伸查詢 |
| 2. | Mammen, Christopher E.(2009)。Controlling the "Plague": Reforming the Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，24，1329-1397。  |
| 3. | Dolak, Lisa A.(2010)。The Inequitable Conduct Gyre Widens。IDEA，50，215-216。 |
| 4. | Murphy, Nicole M.(2009)。Inequitable-Conduct Doctrine Reform: Is the Death Penalty for Patents Still Appropriate?。MINN. L. REV.，93，2274-2280。 |
| 5. | Peter, Elizabeth(2008)。Are We Living in a Material World?: An Analysis of the Federal Circuit's Materiality Standard Under the Patent Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct。IOWA L. REV.，93，1519-1535。 |
| 6. | Hricik, David(2003)。Wrong about Everything: The Application By the District Courts of Rule 9(B) to Inequitable Conduct。MARQ. L. Rev.，86，895-896。 |
| 7. | Chisum, Donald S.(1997)。Best Mode Concealment and Inequitable Conduct in Patent Procurement: A Nutshell, a Review of Recent Federal Circuit Cases and a Plea for Modest Reform。Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal，13(2)，277-299。 |
| 8. | Mills, Alicia Griffin(2009)。Protecting Yourself from Your Assertions: Navigating Multiple Regulatory Schemes and Disclosure。Journal of HEALTH & Life Sciences Law，2(2)，111-123。 |
| 9. | Fanelli, Dean L.、Balancia, Victor N.、Smyth, Robert J.、Bretscher, Carl P.、Antonelli, Arthur M.、Sullivan, Mark J.、Basson, Kent E.(2008)。A Review of Recent Decisions of The United States Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit: Area Summaries: 2007 Patent Law Decisions of The Federal Circuit。Am. U. L. Rev.，57，821-889。 |
| 10. | Cotropia, Chritopher A.(2009)。Modernizing Patent Law's Inequitable Cinduct Dontrine。Berkeley Tech. L. J.，24，723-766。 |
| 11. | Lynch, JOHN F.(1988)。An Argument for Eliminating the Defense of Patent Unenforceability Based on Inequitable Conduct。AIPLA Q. J.，16，7-8。 |
| 12. | Sobel, GERALD(2008)。Reconsidering the Scope of the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine in View of Supreme Court Precedent and Patent Policy。FED. ClR. B. J.，18，169-170。 |
| 13. | Elder, Gina(1985)。Note: A Practical Guide For Proving Fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office: J.P. Stevents & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.。Am. U. L. Rev.，34(3)，729-734。 |
| 14. | Bender, Karen G.、Griffen, Susan Haberman、Lipsey, Charles E.(1986)。Patent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: The Year 1985 in Review。Am. U. L. Rev.，35(4)，995-1022。 |
| 15. | Cronin, JAMES(2006)。Inequitable Conduct And The Standard of Materiality: Why The Federal Circuit Should Use The Reasonable Patent Examiner Standard。ST. LOUIS L. J.，50，1327-1339。 |
| 16. | Kayton, LYNCH、Stern(1975)。Fraud in Patent Procurement: Genuine and Sham Charges。Geo Wash. L. Rev.，43，1+32-33。 |
| 17. | Cochran, William(1970)。Historical Review of Fraud in Patent Procurement: The Standards and Procedures for Doing Business Before the Patent Office。J. PAT. OFF. SOC'Y，52，71-79。 |
| 18. | Chisum, Donald S.(1992)。Patent Law Developments In The United States Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit During 1991。Am. U. L. Rev.，41(3)，869-910。 |
| 19. | Simpson, Alexis N.(2009)。The Monster In The Closet: Declawing The Inequitable Conduct Beast In The Attorney-Client Privilege Arena。GA. ST. U. L. REV.，25，735-736。 |
| 20. | Irving, Thomas L.、Kaminski, Michael D.、Evans, Linda S.、McPhail, Donald R.(1994)。A Year in Review: The Federal Circuit's Patent Decisions of 1993。American University Law Review，43(4)，1259-1416。 |
| 21. | Puknys, Erik R.、SCHUETTENHELM, Jared D.(2009)。Applicatiob of The Inequitable Conduct Doctrine After Kingsdown。Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J.，5，839-850。 |
| 22. | Thompsen, BRETT J.(2010)。Resolving Inequitable Conduct Claims According to Kingsdown。Tex. Intell. Prop. L. J.，18，269-275。 |
| 23. | Tyler, LYNN(2009)。Kingsdown Twenty Years Later: What It Takes To Prove Inequitable Conduct Is No Clearer。Wake Forest Intell. Prop. L. J.，10，30-31。 |
| 24. | Tyler, LYNN(2003)。Kingsdown Fifteen Years Later: What Does It Take To Prove Inequitable Conduct?。Fed. Cir. B. J.，13，267-278。 |
| 25. | NOLAN-Stevaux, KATHERINE(2005)。Inequitable Conduct Claims in the 21st Century: Combating the Plague。Berkeley Tech. L. J.，20，147-154。 |
| 26. | Carmichael, Jim、Weiffenbach, Cameron(2009)。Inequitable Conduct, Gross Negligence And The Kingsdown Decision。THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW，8，18-33。 |