:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Transferring Relation in Metaphor and the Mthat Account
書刊名:東吳哲學學報
作者:古秀鈴 引用關係
作者(外文):Ku, Hsiu-lin
出版日期:2012
卷期:25
頁次:頁43-60
主題關鍵詞:隱喻轉移關係SternMetaphorJosef SternMthatTransferring relation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:11
在解釋隱喻的可理解性時,首要之務為解釋轉移關係—我們如何藉由脈絡資訊,將隱喻中的語詞轉移其語意性質,成為一個適當的性質,應用至所欲描述的對象上以產生隱喻內容。但Stern 所提供的Mthat 旨在分析理解隱喻時的底層結構,而非訴諸語詞意義的分析。然而在分析其Mthat 及其對脈絡主義的批評後,我試圖指出,若不深化轉移關係的研究,Stern 難以成功說明隱喻理解。
In explaining the intelligibility of metaphor, the vital thing to be explained is the transferring relation—how we, with the contextual clues, transfer the semantic property of an object or expression in a metaphorical sentence into a suitable one to arrive at the metaphorical content. Yet, Josef Stern proffers the Mthat account to analyze the underlying structure of understanding metaphor, contrary to those appealing to the analyses of the entry of expressions. Through reviewing Stern’s own Mthat account and his criticism of contextualism in philosophy of language, I point out that his Mthat hardly succeeds in explaining the intelligibility of metaphor without investigating into the transferring relation.
期刊論文
1.Camp, E.(2005)。Review: Metaphor in Context。Noûs,39(4),715-731。  new window
2.Camp, E.(2006)。Contextualism, Metaphor, and What is Said。Mind and Language,21(3),280-309。  new window
3.Stern, J.(2006)。Metaphor, Literal, Literalism。Mind and Language,21(3),243-279。  new window
4.Wearing, C.(2006)。Metaphor and What is Said。Mind and Language,21(3),310-332。  new window
圖書
1.Kittay, E. F.(1987)。Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Fogelin, Robert J.(1988)。Figuratively Speaking。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
3.Ortony, A.(1993)。Metaphor and Thought。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Black, Max(1962)。Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy。Cornell University Press。  new window
5.Camp, E.(2006)。With Marga Reimer (Metaphor)。Handbook of Language of Philosophy \\ E. Lepore ; B. Smith (Eds.)。Oxford。  new window
6.Davidson, D.(1984)。What Metaphors Mean。Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation。Oxford。  new window
7.Guttenplan, S.(2005)。Objects of Metaphor。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
8.Leezenberg, M.(2001)。Contexts of Metaphor。New York。  new window
9.Stern, J.(2000)。Metaphor in Context。Cambridge, Mass。  new window
圖書論文
1.Searle, J.(1979)。Literal meaning。Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts。Cambridge, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Bezuidenhout, A.(2001)。Metaphor and What is Said: A Defense of a Direct Expression View of Metaphor。Figurative Language。Oxford:Blackwell Publishers。  new window
3.Black, M.(1993)。More on Metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE