臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：程序主義與反思 (身) 法典範之爭：從哈伯馬斯對韋伯法理論之批判談起
書刊名：歐美研究
作者：李俊增 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Chiun-tseng
出版日期：2012
卷期：42:1
頁次：頁83-165
主題關鍵詞：形式法律；實質法律；反思法律；反身法律；程序主義法典範；社會法；Formal law；Deformalized law；Reflexive law；Proceduralist paradigm；Social law
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:142
在《經濟與社會》乙書中，韋伯討論現代法律隨著社會理性化出現之形式性質，並強烈質疑福利國家出現導致之法律的實質化。韋伯此一有關形式法律與實質法律之原創性的分析引發了此後數十年的論戰。面對福利國家法律實質化產生之問題，法律社會學家屠布涅亦從系統論之觀點，提出反思 (身)法之法律形式，企圖以之取代實質法律。哈伯馬斯則提出程序主義法典範，希望能有效解決其中之論爭。本文從哈伯馬斯對於韋伯法社會學之詮釋、批判與回應為起點，進一步以程序主義法典範為中心，來探討程序主義與反思 (身)法典範之論爭。
With the emergence and development of the modern welfare state, classical liberal conceptions of the legal norm have been undermined to a great extent. This trend has provoked a heated debate between sociologists, political scientists and legal scholars. Since publication, Max Weber’s famous discussion of antiformal tendencies in modern law, in Economy and Society, has defined the terms of the debate over welfare state law. In response to the problems resulting from the law’s materialization, G. Teubner proposes a reflexive law model. J. Habermas offers his proceduralist paradigm of law and hopes it will satisfactorially answer the debates between the liberal, social-welfare and reflexive models. This paper hopes to show that Habermas’s paradigm proves to be a creative force while raising some questions.
期刊論文
1.李俊增(20090900)。法律、規訓與治理--現代權力關係中之法律形式。政治與社會哲學評論，30，1-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Teubner, Gunther(1983)。Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law。Law & Society Review，17(2)，239-286。  new window
3.Habermas, J.(2001)。Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?。Political Theory，29(6)，766-781。  new window
4.顏厥安(20010500)。溝通、制度與民主文化--由哈伯瑪斯的法理論初探社會立憲主義。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，30(3)，1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李俊增(20041200)。多元分歧與正當性：對Habermas程序主義法理論之檢證。政治與社會哲學評論，11，83-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hung, L.-T.(2002)。從反思法到自生法--屠布涅法律社會學之解析。問題與研究 \=Issues and Studies，41(3)，1-43。  延伸查詢new window
7.Black, J.(1996)。Constitutionalizing self-regulation。The Modern Law Review，59(1)，24-55。  new window
8.Blankenburg, E.(1984)。The poverty of evolutionism: A critique of Teubner’s case for “reflexive law”。Law & Society Review，18(2)，273-290。  new window
9.Bohman, J.(1994)。Complexity, pluralism and the constitutional state: On Habermas’s faktizität und geltung。Law & Society Review，28(4)，897-930。  new window
10.Chen, C.(2007)。The new legal paradigm of Jean Cohen and its implication for public online dispute resolution。EurAmerica，37(4)，513-533。  new window
11.Teubner, Gunther(1992)。The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism。Cardozo Law Review，13(5)，1442-1462。  new window
學位論文
1.林佳和(2005)。勞動關係去管制的憲法界限--以德國法為中心之國家學嘗試(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cohen, Jean L.(2002)。Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm。Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Teubner, Gunther(1993)。Law as an Autopoietic System。Blackwell Publishers。  new window
3.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston：Beacon Press。  new window
4.Habermas, Jürgen、林朝成、沈力(1990)。溝通與社會演化。臺北：結構群文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Habermas, Jürgen、Burger, Thomas、Lawrence, Frederick(1989)。The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
6.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
7.Arato, A.(1998)。Procedural law and civil society: Interpreting the radical democratic paradigm。Habermas on law and democracy: Critical exchanges \\ M. Rosenfeld ; A. Arato (eds.)。Berkeley, CA。  new window
8.Cohen, J. L.、Arato, A.(1994)。Civil society and poltical theory。Cambridge, MA。  new window
9.Deflem, M.(1996)。Introduction: Law in Habermas’s theory of communicative action。Habermas, modernity and law \\ M. Deflem (ed.)。London。  new window
10.Eder, K.(2002)。Critique of Habermas’s contribution to the sociology of law。Jürgen Habermas \\ D. M. Rasmussen ; J. Swindal (eds.)。London。  new window
11.Fitzpatrick, P.(2001)。Abiding the world: Globalism and the lex mercatoria。Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesis \\ J. Přibáň ; D. Nelken (eds.)。Aldershot。  new window
12.Guibentif, P.(1996)。Approaching the production of law through Habermas’s concept of communicative action。Habermas, modernity and law \\ M. Deflem (ed.)。London。  new window
13.Luhmann, N.(1992)。Some problems with “reflexive Law”。State, law and economy as autopoietic systems \\ G. Teubner ; A. Febbrajo (eds.)。Milan。  new window
14.McCormick, J. P.(2007)。Weber, Habermas, and transformation of the European State: Constitutional, social, and supranational democracy。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Orts, E. W.(2001)。Autopoiesis and the natural environment。Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesis \\ J. Přibáň ; D. Nelken (eds.)。Aldershot。  new window
16.Rasmussen, D. M.(2002)。How is valid law possible?: A review of between facts and norms by J. Habermas。Jürgen Habermas \\ D. M. Rasmussen ; J. Swindal (eds.)。London。  new window
17.Rehg, W.(1996)。Translator’s introduction。Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy \\ J. Habermas。Cambridge, MA。  new window
18.Rogowski, R.(2001)。The concept of reflexive laber law: Its theoretical background and possible applications。Law’s new boundaries: The consequences of legal autopoiesis \\ J. Přibáň ; D. Nelken (eds.)。Aldershot。  new window
19.Rogowski, R.、Wilthagen, T.(1994)。Reflexive labour law: Studies in industrial relations and employment regulation。Deventer。  new window
20.Scheuerman, W. E.(1994)。Between norm and the exception: The Frankfurt school and the rule of law。Cambridge, MA。  new window
21.Scheuerman, W. E.(2004)。Liberal democracy and the social acceleration of time。Baltimore and London。  new window
22.Scheuerman, W. E.(2008)。Neumann v. Habermas: The Frankfurt school and the case of the rule of law。Frankfurt school perspectives on globalization, democracy and the law。New York & London。  new window
23.Scheuerman, W. E.(2008)。Prospects and perile of proceduralist law。Frankfurt school perspectives on globalization, democracy and the law \\ W. E. Scheuerman。New York & London。  new window
24.Smismans, S.(2005)。Reflexive law in support of directly deliberative polyarchy: Reflexive-deliberative polyarchy as a normative frame for the OMC。Social rights and market forces: Is the open coordination of employment and social polices the future of social Europe \\ O. De. Schutter ; S. Deakin (eds.)。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
25.Teubner, G.(1986)。After legal instrumentalism? Strategic models of post-regulatory law。Dilemmas of law in the welfare state \\ G. Teubner (ed.)。Berlin & New York。  new window
26.Teubner, G.(1998)。De collisione discursuum: Communicative rationalities in law, morality and politics。Habermas on law and democracy: Critical exchanges \\ M. Rosenfeld ; A. Arato (eds.)。Berkeley, CA。  new window
27.Willke, H.(1986)。Three types of legal structure: The conditional, the purposive and the relational program。Dilemmas of law in the welfare state \\ G. Teubner (ed.)。Berlin & New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃瑞祺(1998)。理性討論與民主：哈伯馬斯之溝通理論的民主涵義。多元主義。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.林遠澤(20100000)。論哈伯馬斯溝通理性建築學的法權定位。溝通、批判和實踐：哈伯馬斯八十論集。臺北：允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張桐銳(20020000)。合作國家。當代公法新論：翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李俊增(2007)。對哈伯馬斯論辯倫理學中普遍化原則之證立的檢證--兼論此項原則之有效性的限度。現代性的政治反思。台北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Habermas, J.(1988)。Law and morality。The Tanner lectures on human values。Salt Lake City, UT：University of Utah Press。  new window
6.Habermas, J.(1998)。Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state。The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
7.Teubner, G.(1987)。Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions。Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law。Berlin：De Gruyter。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：778（臺灣：770，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67793850
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上