:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:是壟斷智慧?還是創造財產?--從勞動財產權理論論智慧財產權擴張之趨勢
書刊名:財產法暨經濟法
作者:胡心蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Hsin-lan
出版日期:2011
卷期:26
頁次:頁85-127
主題關鍵詞:智慧財產權洛克勞動理論財產權理論財產權化智慧財產權擴張Intellectual property rightsLocke's Labor TheoryProperty rights theoryPropertizationExpansion of intellectual property rights
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:69
期刊論文
1.Risch, Michael(2008)。Everything is Patentable。Tennessee Law Review,75。  new window
2.張懿云、賴曉君(20090700)。球類運動轉播之法律問題研究--以美國法為中心。公平交易季刊,17(3),1-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(20070400)。論美國數位千禧年著作權法中反規避濫用原則之發展。科技法學評論,4(1),103-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Hughes, Justin(1988)。The Philosophy of Intellectual Property。Geo. L. J.,77,287-365。  new window
5.Carrier, Michael A.(2004)。Cabining Intellectual Property through a Property Paradigm。Duke Law Journal,54(1),1-58。  new window
6.Boyle, James(2003)。The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems,66(1/2),33-74。  new window
7.Moore, Adam D.(1997)。A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property。Hamline Law Review,21,65-108。  new window
8.Mossoff, Adam(2005)。Digital Copyright Conferences : Is Copyright Property?。SAN DIEGO L. REV.,42,29。  new window
9.Samuelson, Pamela(1999)。Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Regulations Need to Be Revised。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,14(2),519-566。  new window
10.李智仁(20041100)。人格權經濟利益之保障--個人公開權(Right of Publicity)之探討。法令月刊,55(11),28-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Hughes, Justin(20061009)。Copyright and Incomplete Historiographies: Of Piracy, Propertization,and Thomas Jefferson。Southern California Law Review,79,993。  new window
12.胡心蘭、蔡岳勳(20091000)。促進抑或是阻礙創新?從法律經濟學角度審視美國商業方法專利之適格性爭議--以In Re Bilski案為例。政大智慧財產評論,7(2),125-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Lemley, Mark A.(2005)。Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding。Texas Law Review,83(4),1031-1075。  new window
14.蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(20050600)。從法律與經濟學的角度分析美國著作權法之科技保護措施及合理使用原則。中原財經法學,14,157-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Nimmer, Melville B.(1954)。The Right of Publicity。Law and Contemporary Problems,19(2),203-223。  new window
16.謝銘洋(201008)。從美國法上之商業利用權(Right of Publicity)探討肖像權之財產權化--最高法院九十七年憂上字第一三九六號民事判決解析。月旦裁判時報,4,102-108。  延伸查詢new window
17.Dabney, James W.(2007)。KSR: It was not a Ghost。Santa Clara and High Technology Law Journal,24(1),131-165。  new window
18.Damstedt, Benjamin G.(200302)。Limiting Locke: A Natural Law Justification for the Fair Use Doctrine。The Yale Law Journal,112(5),1179-1221。  new window
19.Easterbrook, Frank H.(1990)。Intellectual Property is Still Property。Harvard Journal of Law & Public Pol'y,13,108-118。  new window
20.McGowan, David(200405)。Copyright Nonconsequentialism。Missouri Law Review,69(1)。  new window
21.Moore, Adam D.(2003)。Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Social Progress: The Case Against Incentive Based Arguments。The Hamline Law Review,26,602-630。  new window
會議論文
1.胡心蘭(2010)。其一不是唯一--美國最高法院Bilski判決評析」。國立雲林科技大學2010 科技法律發展趨勢國際研討會,國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所、中區技職院校區域教學資源中心、國立雲林技大學國際事務處、雲林地方法院檢察署、雲林縣觀護志工協進會 (會議日期: 2010/11),127-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Hughes, Justin(20061001)。Locke 's 1694 Memorandum (and More Incomplete Copyright Historiographies)。  new window
圖書
1.施文高(1993)。比較著作權法制。台北市:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝銘洋(2008)。智慧財產權法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.Locke, John、Laslett, Peter(1988)。Two Treatises of Government。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Robert, Cooter、Thomas, Ulem(2000)。Law and Economic。  new window
5.Halbert, Debora J.(19990130)。Intellectual Property in the Information Age: the Politics of Expanding Ownership Rights。  new window
其他
1.章忠信(2011)。著作人格權於美國之保護狀況簡析,http://www .copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=5&act=read&id=27, 2011/04/06。  延伸查詢new window
2.章忠信(2011)。智慧財產權基本概念,http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board= 1 &act=read&id=3 7http://homepage.acer.com/rdr.aspx?, 2011/04/21。  new window
3.經濟部智慧財產局。http://www.tipo.gov.tw 2011/04/08。  延伸查詢new window
4.維基百科,自由的百科全書,約翰洛克,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wikil%E7%BA %A6%E7%BF%BO%C2%B7%E6%B4%9B%E5%85%8B#, 2011/04/06。  new window
5.Moore, Adam D.。A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property,http://facuIty.washington.eduJmoore2/moore.htm, 2011/04/18。  new window
6.Carter, Stephen L.(1993)。Does it Matter Whether Intellectual Property is Property?,http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers。  new window
7.Duffy, John F.。KSR’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari, April 6, 2005,http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/4_2D06_2D05Certpetition formatted.pdf, 2011/04/21。  new window
8.Electronic Frontier Foundation。Unintended Consequences: Seven Years Under the DMCA,http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCAIDMCA_unintended_v4.pdf, 2011/04/21。  new window
9.Epstein, Richard A.(200404)。Liberty versus Property? Cracks in the Foundations of Copyright Law,http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/workingpapers.html, 2011/04/21。  new window
10.Epstein, Richard A.(200803)。A response to Peter Menell, The Property Rights Movement and Intellectual Property,http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv30n4/v30n4-7.pdf, 2011/04/21。  new window
11.Fisher, William W. III(1999)。The Growth of Intellectual Property: A History of the Ownersh of Ideas in the United States,http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property99/history.html, 2011/04/21。  new window
12.Fisher, WilIiam W. III(2001)。Theories of Intellectual Property, New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property,Cambridge University Press。,http://cyber. law.harvard.edu/people/tfisherIIPlFishe.-o1020IP%20Theory .pdf, 2011/04/21。  new window
13.Menell, Peter S.(2007)。Should intellectual property be accorded the same protections as tangible forms of property? Intellectual Property and the Property Rights Movement,http://www.cato.orglpubs/regulationl/egv30n3/v30n3-6.pdf, 2011/04/10。  new window
14.Stallman, Richard M.(2004)。Did You Say “Intellectual Property "? It 's a Seductive Mirage, GNU,http://www.gnu.org/phi1osophy/not-ipr.xhtml, 20110410。  new window
圖書論文
1.蔡岳勳、胡心蘭(2010)。從法律與經濟學的角度分析美國著作權法之科技保護措施及合理使用原則。智慧財產權之擴張與公共利益之衡平。Airiti Press。  延伸查詢new window
2.Locke, John(1997)。His Observation on the Censorship。Political Essay。Cambridge Univ. Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE