:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Psych Predicates and Causation in Hakka: A Constructional Approach
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:黃漢君 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Han-chun
出版日期:2012
卷期:30:1=68
頁次:頁309-340
主題關鍵詞:構式語法心理謂語致使感事者主語起事者主語客語Construction grammarPsych predicatesCausationExperiencer-subjectStimulus-subjectHakka
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:71
  • 點閱點閱:105
本文探討客語心理謂語的性質,特別著重於詞彙語意與句法的互動關係。根據句法表現,心理謂語可分為兩類:感事者主語(如英語動詞fear)以及起事者主語(如英語動詞frighten)。客語的「惜」(xiag4)、「愁」(seu5)、「惱」(nau1)、「驚」(giang1)、「譴」(kien2)為前者,而「嚇」(hag4)為後者。本文所有的語料皆取自客語語料庫,力求反映客語心理謂語的真實用法。感事者主語類心理謂語具有類似的句法分布,例如接受程度修飾,以及可以出現在結果或程度構式中。起事者主語類心理謂語以各種方式表達致使:詞彙手段如「嚇」,構詞手段如「V-死」複合詞,句法手段如「分+NP+V」以及「得+人+V」(但後者已形成詞彙化之固定用法)。構詞性致使與句法性致使具有將感事者主語類心理謂語轉換成起事者主語類心理謂語之功能。因此兩者皆可視為一種對客語中起事者主語類心理謂語遠少於感事者主語類心理謂語的不平衡現象加以調整之機制。我們採納Goldberg(1995)所主張的「構式語法」(Construction Grammar)理論。該理論認為語法的基本組成單位為構式(形式與意義的配對)。其優點為合理解釋客語心理謂語與本文中所討論的七種句式(其中三種為感事者主語類,四種為起事者主語類)的互動關係,而不需要去設立額外且特殊個案式的心理謂語意義。
This paper investigates the properties of Hakka psych predicates with a focus on the interaction of lexical semantics and syntax. Based on syntactic realization, psych predicates in Hakka are divided into two types: experiencersubject (such as the verb fear), including xiag4 "to like," seu5 "to worry," nau1 "to dislike," giang1 "to fear," and kien2 "to get angry," and stimulus-subject (such as the verb frighten), including hag4 "to frighten." All data in this paper are corpus-based and reflect real-world usage of Hakka psych predicates.Psych predicates of the experiencer-subject type have similar syntactic distributions such as allowing degree modification and occurring in result/extent constructions. Psych predicates of the stimulus-subject type express causation in terms of lexical (e.g. hag4 "to frighten"), morphological (e.g. V-xi2 compounds), or analytic (i.e. periphrastic, syntactic) means (e.g. [bun1+NP+V] and [ded4+ngin5+V], though the latter is fossilized, or lexicalized). The morphological and analytic causatives have the function of converting psych predicates of the experiencer-subject type into those of the stimulus-subject type. Thus they may be viewed as a kind of mechanism to counteract the asymmetry that lexical psych predicates of the stimulus-subject type are outnumbered by those of the experiencer-subject type in Hakka.We adopt the theory of Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995) which argues that the basic building blocks in grammar are constructions (form-meaning pairings). It has the advantage of explaining the interaction of the psych predicates and the seven sentential constructions (three of the experiencer-subject type and four of the stimulus-subject type) discussed in this paper, without having to resort to additional, ad hoc senses of the psych predicates.
期刊論文
1.Belletti, Adriana、Rizzi, Luigi(1988)。Psych-verbs and θ-theory。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,6(3),291-352。  new window
2.賴惠玲(20010700)。On Hakka BUN: A Case of Polygrammaticalization。語言暨語言學,2(2),137-153。new window  new window
3.Cheng, Robert L.(1985)。Sub-syllabic morphemes in Taiwanese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,13(1),12-43。  new window
4.Li, Yafei(1990)。On V-V compounds in Chinese。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,8(2),177-207。  new window
5.Cheng, Lisa L.-S.、Huang, C.-T. James、Li, Y.-H. Audrey、Tang, C.-C. Jane(1999)。Hoo, Hoo, Hoo: Syntax of the Causative, Dative and Passive Constructions in Taiwanese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics (Monograph): Contemporary Studies on the Min Dialects,14,146-203。  new window
6.鄭良偉(1974)。Causative Constructions in Taiwanese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,2(3),279-324。  new window
7.Dowty, David R.(1991)。Thematic proto-roles and argument selection。Language,67(3),547-619。  new window
8.Goldberg, Adele E.(2003)。Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7(5),219-224。  new window
9.Jackendoff, Ray(1997)。Twistin' the Night Away。Language,73(3),534-559。  new window
10.Michaelis, Laura、Lambrecht, Knud(1996)。Toward a Construction-based Theory of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition。Language,72(2),215-247。  new window
11.Fillmore, Charles J.、Kay, Paul、O'Connor, Mary Catherine(1988)。Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone。Language,64(3),501-538。  new window
12.Huang, C.-T. James(1988)。Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure。Language,64(2),274-311。  new window
13.張麗麗(20050500)。從使役到致使。臺大文史哲學報,62,119-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.連金發(19991200)。A Typological Study of Causatives in Taiwanese Southern Min。清華學報,29(4),395-422。new window  new window
15.Li, Yafei(1995)。The thematic hierarchy and causativity。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,13(2),255-282。  new window
16.李詩敏、賴惠玲(20110900)。臺灣客語表完成貌與持續貌「著」之探討--詞彙語意與構式互動的觀點。漢學研究,29(3)=66,191-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Kay, Paul、Fillmore, Charles J.(1999)。Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What's X Doing Y? Construction。Language,75(1),1-33。  new window
18.湯廷池(20020700)。漢語複合動詞的「使動與起動交替」。語言暨語言學,3(3),615-644。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Chang, Li-li、Chen, Keh-jiann、Huang, Chu-ren(2000)。Alternation across Semantic Fields: A Study on Mandarin Verbs of Emotion。Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing,5(1),61-80。  new window
20.江敏華(2006)。“Grammatical Characteristics of Tung mid Bun in Dongshi Hakka and the Relatedness of the Two Markers。Language and Linguistics,7,339-364。  new window
21.Huang, Shuan-fan.(1974)。“Mandarin Causatives.”。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,2(3),354-369。  new window
22.Van Voorst, Jan.(1992)。The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs。Linguistics and Philosophy,15,65-92。  new window
23.江敏華(2007)。Verb complement construction in Dongshi Hakka。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,35(2),225-266。  new window
學位論文
1.楊素芬(2000)。漢語心理動詞(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳秀枝(1993)。漢語的心理動詞(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lai, Wei-jong.(2004)。“Chinese Psychological Predicates: Interactions between Constructions and Semantics.”。  new window
圖書
1.Jackendoff, Ray(2007)。Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure。MIT Press。  new window
2.劉美君(2001)。Mandarin Verbal Semantics: A Corpus-based Approach。Mandarin Verbal Semantics: A Corpus-based Approach。Taipei:Grane Publishing。new window  new window
3.Levin, Beth、University of Chicago(1993)。English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation。Chicago, IIl。  new window
4.Talmy, Leonard(2000)。Toward a Cognitive Semantics。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
5.Comrie, Bernard(1989)。Language Universals and Linguistic Typology。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Grimshaw, Jane B.(1990)。Argument Structure。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
7.Goldberg, Adele Eva(1995)。Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure。University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.Goldberg, Adele E.(2006)。Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Rey, Charles.(1926)。Dictionnaire Chinois-Français Dialecte Hac-ka。Hong Kong。  new window
10.何石松、劉醇鑫(2006)。Keyu Ciku。Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
11.Dixon, R. M. W.(2000)。“A Typology of Causatives: Form, Syntax and Meaning.”。Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity。Cambridge。  new window
12.MacIver, D.、Mackenzie, M. C.(1991)。A Chinese-English Dictionary, Hakka Dialect。  new window
13.Shibatani, Masayoshi.(1976)。“The Grammar of Causative Constructions: A Conspectus.”。Syntax ana Semantics: The Grammar of Causative Constructions。New York。  new window
14.Teng, Shon-hsin.(1989)。“The Semantics of Causatives in Chinese.”。Functionalism and Chinese Grammar。South Orange, NJ。  new window
其他
1.黃漢君(2009)。On Conceptual Structure and Argument Realization of Hakka Psych Predicates,Sapporo, Japan。  new window
2.黃雪貞(1998)。Meixian Fangyan Cidian,Nanjing。  new window
3.徐兆泉.(2009)。Hakka Dictionary of Taiwan,Taipei。  new window
4.中原週刊社客家文化學術硏究會(1992)。Kehua Cidian,Miaoli。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen、Huang, C.-T. James(1994)。On the argument structure of resultative compounds。In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change。Pyramid Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE