The current land registration in Taiwan adopted both the Germany ”Right Registration System” and Australia ”Torrens Registration System”. One of the features in the land registration is: the registration officer must be ”substantive examine (review)” on the application case. ”Substantive examine (review)” means that the registration officer must take the following measurements: 1.the matter contained in the application are the same with the certificate documents/ register; 2.certificate documents are true; 3.rights of land are not dispute; and 4. the registration case violates the injunction/ prohibition or not, and so on. Then Published in the land register only after reviewing is correct. Therefore, this article gave an example on the apply review conditions of ”Prescriptive Superficies Right”, the resolution of The Supreme Administrative Court Judges joint conference in September, 2006 considered that: land registration apply of Prescriptive Superficies Right, it need to attached related documents about ”possessed based on the meaning of exercise the superficies right”. In other words, the Applicant needs to bear the burden of proof in the meaning of exercise the superficies right. Otherwise, the land office could reject the application according to the law. The section 118 of Land Registration Rules amendments also complied with the aims. Nevertheless, is it correct that the Registration authority rejects the case and do not examine as long as the case involving ”private rights dispute”? If so, it will be contrary to the intention of the ”substantive review”. Therefore, this article tries to analyze the German land-registration system, and summarized the following four suggestions for the competent authorities: 1. use the ”alternative matters” rule of the relevant principles of land registration law; 2. Land registration staff keep in the relevant provisions of the Civil Law and the Land Registration law; 3. Use notary profession and auxiliary measures to ensure the correctness that matters of land registration records consistent with the physical legal relationship. 4. To determine principle of registration consensus more important than the principle of legally registered.