:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電子資源整合查詢系統使用者接受度與使用行為之研究
書刊名:教育資料與圖書館學
作者:李靜宜柯皓仁 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Ching-yiKe, Hao-ren
出版日期:2012
卷期:49:3
頁次:頁369-404
主題關鍵詞:整合查詢科技接受模式使用者研究Federated searchTechnology acceptance modelUser study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:61
本研究探討使用者對電子資源整合查詢系統的認知情形、系統接受度與使用行為。本研究以科技接受模式為框架,發展適用於評量使用者對整合查詢系統之接受度與使用行為的問卷,繼而以交大圖書館之MetaLib系統為個案,探討該館讀者使用整合查詢系統的接受程度與使用行為,探討影響整合查詢系統使用行為的相關因素,分析本研究所提出之科技接受模式外部變項「教育訓練認知」和該模式之「易用性認知」、「有用性認知」、「態度」、「使用意願」及「使用行為」等變項間的關係。研究結果發現,整合查詢系統有助於使用者找尋所需的資源,使用者對於整合查詢系統功能的認同程度頗高,絕大多數會推薦他人使用該系統,但在系統功能、介面設計與使用者教育訓練方面仍有改善空間。結果證實教育訓練認知、有用性認知、易用性認知、態度、使用意願確實會影響使用者對整合查詢系統之認知情形、系統接受度與使用行為。
This study aims at investigating the perceptions, acceptance and usage behavior of users on federated search systems. The research method involved the development of a questionnaire on users’ satisfaction and acceptance of federated search systems based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The federated search system implemented in National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) was used as a case system. In addition to the six constructs of TAM, i.e. perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, behavioral intention, and actual use, the construct user training is proposed as the external variable. After the development of the questionnaire was finished, an online survey was conducted. 403 effective responses were collected. Through Pearson-product moment correlation and structural equation modeling, the correlation and causal relationships between factors which influence the acceptance of library SMS services were identified. The results show that federated search systems are helpful to obtain needed resources for users. Users recognize the functions of systems and most of them will recommend it to others. But there are still great improvements to be done on functions, interface design and user training. It is proved that user training, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes and intentions affect the perceptions, acceptance and usage behavior of federated search systems indeed.
期刊論文
1.林佳穎、吳明德(20110900)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統之好用性評估:以國立臺灣大學圖書館MUSE電子資源整合查詢系統為例。大學圖書館,15(2),1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.姜義臺(20101100)。圖書館電子資源整合檢索系統優使性之研究--以靜宜大學為例。圖書與資訊學刊,2(4)=75,25-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Efron, B.(1979)。Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife。The Annals of Statistics,7,1-26。  new window
4.Igbaria, Magid、Guimaraes, Tor、Davis, Gordon B.(1995)。Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model。Journal of management information systems,11(4),87-114。  new window
5.Goodhue, Dale L.、Thompson, Ronald L.(1995)。Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance。MIS Quarterly,19(2),213-236。  new window
6.Davis, Fred D.、Bagozzi, Richard P.、Warshaw, Paul R.(1989)。User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models。Management Science,35(8),982-1003。  new window
7.Davis, Fred D.(1989)。Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, & User Acceptance of Information Technology。MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340。  new window
8.Thong, J. Y. L.、Hong, W.、Tam, K. Y.(2002)。Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,57(3),215-242。  new window
學位論文
1.羅嵐(2006)。數位圖書館異質整合檢索系統評析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Davis, Fred D.(1986)。A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and result(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
圖書
1.Ajzen, I、Fishbein, M.(1975)。Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour。New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.吳明隆(2008)。SPSS操作與應用--問卷統計分析實務。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.吳樹華(2008)。圖書館異質資源整合檢索系統之使用者介面評估研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.Breeding, M.(2011)。Automation marketplace 2011: The new frontier。  new window
3.Cox, C(2006)。An analysis of the impact of federated search products on library instruction using the ACRL standards。  new window
4.George, C. A(2008)。Lessons learned: Usability testing a federated search product。  new window
5.Haya, G., Nygren, E., & Wildmark, W.(2007)。Metalib and google scholar: A user study。  new window
6.Helfer, D. S., & Wakimoto, J. C.(2005)。Metasearching: The good, the bad, and the ugly of making it work in your library。  new window
7.Highsmith, A. L., & Ponsford, B. C.(2006)。Notes on MetaLib implement at Texas A&M University。  new window
8.Jasco, P.(2004)。Thoughts about federated searching。  new window
9.Jin, Y., & Peng, J.(2009)。Information portal development and practice at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library。  new window
10.Korah, A., & Cassidy, E. D.(2010)。Students and federated searching: A survey of use and satisfaction。  new window
11.Labelle, P. R.(2007)。Initiating the learning process: A model for federated searching and information literacy。  new window
12.Luther, J.(2003)。Trumping Google: Metasearching's promise。  new window
13.Spacey, R., Goulding, A., & Murray, I. R.(2004)。The power of influence: What affects public library staff’s attitudes to the Internet。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sobel, M. E.(1982)。Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models。Sociology methodology 1982。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE