:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:法蘭茲.李斯特的「交響詩」釋義:對「Dichtung」做為一種樂種的思考
書刊名:中山人文學報
作者:劉彥玲
作者(外文):Liu, Annie Yen-ling
出版日期:2012
卷期:33
頁次:頁181-202
主題關鍵詞:李斯特交響詩Franz LisztSymphonische DichtungDichtung
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:31
Symphonic poem(交響詩),係譯自德文術語symphonische Dichtung。透過這個於十九世紀中期掀起爭議的新興樂種,李斯特企圖躋身於前衛交響作曲家之列。李斯特為其交響全集冠以symphonische Dichtung之名而出版,而非一開始所用的法文poèmes symphoniques。Dichtung比poèmes顯現出更多的優勢嗎?一八五五年時,李斯特發表以白遼士的《哈羅德交響曲》為引子,以「標題交響樂」(program symphony)而非symphonische Dichtung為名,來捍衛其交響作品的美學地位的文章。若將該文做為理解symphonische Dichtung的主要依據,poem僅能單薄地對應德文所蘊涵的意義。筆者將對弗里德里希‧施萊格爾這位代表德國浪漫派思潮對Dichtung的論述,李斯特的標題音樂理論,與其音樂如何處理文學結構這三者之間做相互的參照與檢視。施萊格爾所謂「反省的片刻」與綜合的文體,可釐清李斯特理論中的「現代英雄」與「哲學史詩」,亦能為他如何用聲音超越文學作品所設定的框架做出詮釋。
The Symphonische Dichtung, the innovative and controversial orchestral genre of the mid-nineteenth century through which Liszt presented himself as an avant-garde composer, is usually translated into English as ”symphonic poem.” Liszt used the term poèmes symphoniques early in the development of the genre and only later used the term symphonische Dichtung when publishing the works. This terminological variability raises the question of what, precisely, Liszt understood as a ”poem” or ”poetry” and its relevance to the formation of this symphonic genre. In his article ”Berlioz und seine Harold Symphonie” (”Berlioz and his Harold Symphony”), published in 1855, Liszt presented the essential concepts informing his conception of programmatic or ”poetic” music. The essay suggests that the ideas invoked by the term Symphonische Dichtung go beyond its English translation to encompass ”poetry” in broader terms. The purpose of this article is to examine this larger conception of ”poetry,” considering Friedrich Schlegel's account of Dichtung, Liszt's theoretical writings on the program symphony, and related compositional issues in Liszt's symphonic works. Certain of Schlegel's ideas, such as the ”moment of reflection” and the ”mixture of different literary genres,” can clarify the somewhat ambiguous concepts of ”modern heroes” and ”philosophical epopoeias” Liszt developed in his account of program music. Schlegel's writings also provide a context in which to understand the way Liszt surpasses the framework provided by literary structures in developing his compositional ideas.
期刊論文
1.Eichner, Hans(1956)。Friedrich Schlegel’s Theory of Romantic Poetry.。Modern Language Association,71(5),1018-1041。  new window
2.Micznik, Vera(1999)。The Absolute Limitations of Programme Music: The Case of Liszt’s 'Die Ideale'。Music and Letters,80(2),207-240。  new window
3.Schabert, Tilo(1979)。A Note of Modernity。Political Theory,7(1)。  new window
4.Walker, Alan(1979)。Schumann,Liszt and the C Major Fantasie,Op.17: A Declining Relationship。Music and Letters,60(2),156-165。  new window
5.Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich(1982)。Dichtung, Symphonie,Programmusik。Archive fur Musikwissenschaft,39(4),223-233。  new window
圖書
1.Schlegel, Friedrich、Firchow, Peter(1991)。Philosophical Fragments。Minneapolis:U of Minnesota P。  new window
2.Dahlhaus, C.(1987)。Ludwig Van Beethoven Und Seine Zeit。Laaber:Laaber-Verlag。  new window
3.Burnham, Scott(1995)。Beethoven Hero。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Rehding, Alexander(2009)。Music and Monumentality: Commemoration and Wonderment in Nineteenth-Century Germany。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Dahlhaus, Carl、Robinson, J. Bradford(1989)。Nineteenth-Century Music。University of California Press。  new window
6.Conrad, Peter(1977)。Romantic Opera and Literary Form。California University Press。  new window
7.Szondi, Peter、Mendelsohn, Harvey(1986)。On Textual Understanding and Other Essays。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
8.Herder, Johann Gottfried、Moore, Gregory(2006)。Selected Writings on Aesthetics。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Liszt, Franz.、Evans, Edwin([185)。The Gypsy in Music。London。  new window
10.Marston, Nicholas(1992)。Schumann, Fantasie, Op. 17.。Cambridge。  new window
11.(2007)。Prometheus in Music: Representations of the Myth in the Romantic Era。Burlington。  new window
12.Daverio, John(1997)。Robert Schumann: Herald of a “New Poetic Age”。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Taruskin, Richard(2005)。The Oxford History of Western Music.。Oxford。  new window
14.Wagner, Richard、Ellis, William Ashton(1995)。Judaism in Music and Other Essays。Lincoln NE and London。  new window
15.Walker, Alan.(1989)。Franz Liszt: The Weimar Years, 1848-1861。NY。  new window
16.Agawu, Kofi(2009)。Music as Discourse: Semiotic Adventures in Romantic Music。Oxford。  new window
17.Schlegel, Friedrich、Barnett, Stuart(2001)。On the Study on Greek Poetry。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
18.Schlegel, Friedrich、Herbert, May(1888)。Early Letters of Robert Schumann。London。  new window
19.Altenburg, Detlef(1997)。Franz Liszt und das Erbe der Klassik。Liszt und die Weimarer Klassik。Laaber。  new window
20.Altenburg, Detlef(2006)。Die Neudeutsche Schule—eine Fiktion der Musikgeschichtsschreibung?。Liszt und die Neudeutsche Schule。Laaber。  new window
21.Angerer, Manfred(1987)。Liszts‘Hunnenschlacht’und die Aporien der symphonischen Dichtung。Studien zur Musikwissenschaft。  new window
22.Bekker, Paul(1918)。Die Sinfonie von Betthoven bisMahler。Berlin。  new window
23.Bertagnolli, Paul.(1998)。Liszt, Goethe, and a Musical Cult Prometheus。Liszt and the Birth of Modern Europe: Music as a Mirror of Religious, Political, Cultural, and Aesthetic Transformation。Hillsdale, NY。  new window
24.Dahlhaus, Carl(1975)。Liszts Bergsymphonie und die Idee der sytnphonischen Dichtung。Jahrbuch des Staatlichen Instituts fur Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz。Berlin。  new window
25.Dahlhaus, Carl(1983)。Symphonie und symphonischer Stil um 1850。Jahrbuch des Staatlichen Instituts fur Musikforschung Preussischer Kulturbesitz。Berlin。  new window
26.Danuser, Hermann(2008)。Symphonischer Geschichtsmythos。Liszt und Europe。Laaber。  new window
27.Miller, Norbert(1975)。Musik als Sprache: Zur Vorgeschichte von Liszts Symphonischen Dichtung。Beitrage zur musikalischen Hermeneutik。Regensburg。  new window
28.Liszt, Franz(1978)。Robert Schumann’s Klavierkompositionen: Opus 5, 11,14。Gesammelte Schriften。Hildesheim:Breitkopf und Härtel。  new window
29.Liszt, Franz.(1950)。From Berlioz and His ‘Harold’Symphony。Source Readings in Music History。NY。  new window
30.Wagnqer, Richard(1894)。Uber Franz Liszt’s symphonische Dichtung。William Ashton Ellis in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works。London。  new window
31.Marston, Nicholas.(2000)。‘The Sense of an Ending’: Goal-Directedness in Beethoven’s Music。The Cambridge Companion to Beethoven。Cambridge。  new window
32.Schlegel, Friedrich(2005)。Liszt’s Symphonic Poems and Symphonies。The Cambridge Companion to Liszt。Cambridge。  new window
33.Liszt, Franz(1897)。Berlioz und seine ‘Harold Symphonie。Gesammelte Schriften。Leipzig。  new window
34.Altenburg, Detlef。Eine Theorie der Musik der Zukunft zur Funktion des Programs in symphonischen Werk von Franz Liszt。Liszt Studien。Graz。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE