:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:差異政治的形成:1946年婦女保障名額制訂的歷史過程
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:黃長玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chang-ling
出版日期:2012
卷期:52
頁次:頁89-116
主題關鍵詞:差異政治保障名額婦女參政公民權憲法The politics of differenceReserved seatsWomen's political participationCitizenshipConstitution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:93
選舉中的婦女保障名額是中華民國橫跨海峽兩岸的歷史中,最具有歷史延續性的體制之一。就體制設計的精神而言,婦女保障名額的設定,和當代差異政治的觀點非常相符。然而,差異政治的相關理論,是1960年代西方第二波婦女運動與新社會運動發展後的產物。相比之下,中華民國憲法本文中婦女保障名額的規定,就差異政治的實踐而言,有先驅性的意義。過去的歷史研究,往往將憲法本文中婦女保障名額的制定,視為婦女爭取參政權的一個連續過程,並未細究兩者之間的區別。然而,女性爭取成為平等的公民,和女性爭取成為政治代表的機會,無論在概念上或是實踐上,都並不完全相同。兩者之間,非但不見得同時出現,也不存在必然的歷史連續性。婦女保障名額的訴求為什麼會出現?在目前關於民國時期婦女參政的研究中,學界並沒有清楚或一致的看法,但是多半認為差異政治的思維是1930年代中期出現。本文重新檢視辛亥革命到制憲時期婦女參政運動的歷史,並且主張1920年初期五四運動的影響及孫中山聯俄容共的政策,使得政治代表應如何產生出現關鍵性的變化。1924年孫中山呼籲召開國民會議時,建議以9種社會團體產生代表,此一建議打破了辛亥革命以來以地域為基礎產生政治代表的慣例,也使得社會身份與政治代表之間產生聯結。這使得1924年到1925年間婦女爭取參與國民會議的運動,促成了婦女應成為一個社會類別的思維,也因此開啟差異政治的論述,最終形成對婦女保障名額的爭取。
Reserving seats for women in elections was stipulated in the Constitution of the Republic of China in 1946, and this constitutional practice has enjoyed historical continuities after the Republic of China government moved to Taiwan. As an institutional design, the reserved seats stipulation fits the contemporary discourse on the politics of difference. Theories of the politics of difference, however, are products of the new social movement of the 1960s in Western countries. The reserved seats stipulation in the Republic of China's constitution therefore, comparatively speaking, was a pioneering practice of the politics of difference. Previous studies on how the reserved seats became a constitutional stipulation tends to regard it as part of the struggle for women's suffrage. However, fighting for the rights to vote is different from fighting to have the opportunity to be political representatives.How did the idea of reserved seats emerge as a political appeal? The current literature does not have a clear answer for this question, but most studies show the emphasis of the difference between men and women emerged as a political discourse in the mid-1930s. This paper traces the history of the women's suffrage movement since 1911, when the Republic of China was established, and argues that the critical moment came in 1924. Influenced by the socialist thinking since the May Fourth movement and his policy on accommodating the Chinese Communist Party, in the mid-1920s Sun Yat-sen came to a different view on how political representatives should be elected. In 1924, when Sun called for a national conference and suggested that the conference should have delegates from nine different social groups, he made a major departure from the previous practice whereby representatives were mainly elected on a regional basis. It was the linkage between the social groups and political representation that prompted feminist activists to campaign on recognizing women as a social group. The campaign led to the emergence of the discourse on the politics of difference, and eventually to the constitutional stipulation on reserved seats for women in elections.
期刊論文
1.李南海(19980200)。制憲時期婦女爭取代表名額始末--以國民大會代表之選舉為例。近代中國,123,170-190。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究,40(3),69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gilmartin, Christina(1995)。Engendering the Chinese Revolution: Radical Women, Communist Politics and Mass Movements in the 1920s。  new window
4.Krook, Mona Lena(2009)。Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Seletion Reform Worldwide。  new window
圖書
1.Elster, Jon(1996)。The Round Table Talks and the Breakdown of Communism。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.簡笙簧(1992)。中國近百年憲政大事年表。台北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
3.談社英(1936)。中國婦女運動通史。南京:婦女共鳴社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dworkin, Ronald(1985)。A Matter of Principle。Cambridge, MA:New York, NY:Harvard University Press:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Kymlicka, Will(1989)。Liberalism, Community and Culture。Oxford, England:Clarendon Press。  new window
6.李劍農(1957)。中國近百年政治史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.胡春惠(1978)。民國憲政運動。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Young, Iris Marion(1990)。Justices and the politics of difference。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.洪宜媜(2010)。中國國民黨婦女工作之研究 (1924-1949)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳茹玄(1933)。中國憲法史。上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔣永敬(2003)。國民黨興衰史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.謝振民、張知本(1937)。中華民國立法史。上海:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.中華全國婦女聯合會婦女運動歷史研究室(1984)。中國婦女運動歷史資料,1921-1927。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.顧秀蓮(2008)。20世紀中國婦女運動史。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.Edwards, Louise(2008)。Gender, Politics, and Democracy。Stanford。  new window
16.Phillips, Anne(1998)。The Politics of Presence。Oxford。  new window
17.中國共產黨(1984)。中國共產黨第二次全國代表大會關於婦女運動的決議。中國婦女運動歷史資料:1921-1927。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.向警予(1984)。國民會議與婦女。中國婦女運動歷史資料:1921-1927。北京。  延伸查詢new window
19.柯臨清(2007)。共產黨早期組織中的性別和性別政治。共和時代的中國婦女。台北。  延伸查詢new window
20.高君寧(1984)。女權運動者應當知道的。中國婦女運動歷史資料:1921-1927。北京。  延伸查詢new window
21.張玉法(2003)。二十世紀前半期中國婦女參政權的演變。近代中國的婦女與國家 *1600-1950)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
22.梁雙蓮、顧燕翎(1995)。婦女與政治參與--體制內與體制外的觀察。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北。  延伸查詢new window
23.鮑羅廷(1996)。鮑羅廷的扎記和通報。聯共 (布)、共產國際與中國國民革命運動 (1920-1925)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
24.鮑羅廷(1996)。鮑羅廷關於華南形勢的扎記。聯共 (布)、共產國際與中國國民革命運動 (1920-1925)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.國民大會秘書處(1946)。國民大會實錄,國民大會秘書處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lewis, Jone Tohnson(2011)。International Woman Suffrage Timeline-2,http://womenshistory.about.com/od/suffrage/a/intl_timeline_2.htm, 20110903。  new window
圖書論文
1.梁惠錦(2000)。婦女爭取參政代表保障名額的經過。蔣夫人宋美齡女士與近代中國學術討論集。臺北:中正文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.王家儉(1988)。民初的女子參政運動。中國婦女史論文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE