:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:明末清初淨土思想對戲曲的影響--以《歸元鏡》為探討
書刊名:戲劇學刊
作者:林智莉 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chih-li
出版日期:2012
卷期:16
頁次:頁89-117
主題關鍵詞:明末清初淨土傳奇智達歸元鏡The late Ming dynasty and early Qing dynastyPure LandChuan QiChin DaGuei Yuan Jing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:119
  • 點閱點閱:88
明末清初佛教復興,禪宗因著陽明心學而盛,強調明心見性的自覺,因過度膨脹引來恣意狂妄的行徑,終被譏為「狂禪」。淨土高僧雲棲袾宏試圖以念佛法門革除狂禪弊端,並提出「禪淨一致論」擺脫傳統「禪主淨副」或「實禪虛淨」的說法。但在面臨禪、淨在自性/依他性的修行矛盾、本心/他土的境界矛盾上,仍引來不少爭論。此一爭論也反映在戲曲創作上,屠隆的《曇花記》、《修文記》、黃粹吾的《西廂昇仙記》雖皆為倡導往生西方的淨土之作,但劇中闡發的主旨仍是淨土即在心中,心外無土的禪宗思想,擺脫不了傳統「實禪虛淨」的說法。這些劇作引起淨土信仰者的不滿,於是有葉憲祖作《雙修記》、僧人智達編寫《歸元鏡》駁其禪淨互舉之不當,於劇中專言淨土修行法門。這些作品不但反映當時禪、淨之爭的現象,也開創戲曲新議題。在戲曲理論上,身為淨土大師的雲棲祩宏也利用戲曲說淨土,除了以戲臺上「有無俱非真,只求專心一意」打破禪宗與淨土爭執西方世界有無的執著,指出信心念佛才是正道;又特別撰寫《諺謨曲典》,針對佛門觀戲行為提出見解。其後,淨土弟子智達編寫《歸元鏡》傳淨土之道,更撰寫〈戲劇融通〉、〈問答因緣〉與〈客問決疑〉闡述戲、佛融通之理,尤其站在淨土立場提出「道種說」和五種因緣和合:佛法、世諦、文字、音律和通俗的方便法門,進一步確立戲佛融通、以戲傳教的功能與意義。智達將理論落實於《歸元鏡》創作中:改「傳奇」為「實錄」,改「齣」為「分」,以維持宗教本貌;強調劇本「真實性」,確保內容為真理、真事,以保有作品神聖性格;強調語言、文字「通俗性」,使庸夫俗婦皆能持佛名號、往生西方;將演出過程視為儀式,不但演員、觀眾必須誠心齋戒,尚有「坐著演」的特殊規範,或即淨土讚歌「坐著唱」表演方式的承襲;配合淨土「以音聲為佛事」,在音樂上更自訂曲牌名稱,穿插咒語、讚歌與佛教細樂演奏,並將重要故實、教義及儀式譜曲演唱,透過音樂宣唱淨土樂景。智達《歸元鏡》於淨土宗廣為流傳,其落實五種因緣和合的方便法門,真正達到以戲傳教的目的。
In the late Ming and early Qing dynasties when Buddhism was revived, Zen Buddhism also thrived thanks to the dominance of the Yangming School of Mind. Zen Buddhism highly valued self-consciousness; a clear mind was considered vital to discovering true human nature. However, due to unscrupulous behaviors resulting from following the mind in an unconstrained manner, the school was eventually satirized as “Wild Zen.” In response, Pure Land Buddhism master Yun Qi-zhu-hong (雲棲袾宏) attempted to abolish the corrupt practice of Wild Zen by proposing the method of chanting Amitabha. In addition, to counter the traditional belief that Zen Buddhism was superior to Pure Land Buddhism, he asserted that Zen Buddhism and Pure Land Buddhism should be practiced in tandem. However, these two schools held contradictory opinions toward the practice of Buddhism, i.e. such as whether the practice should rely on one’s true nature/mind or on external objects/other lands, which led to many debates. Such debates were also reflected in the creation of Chinese opera pieces such as Tan Hua Ji (曇花記) and Siou Wun Ji (修文記) written by Tu Long (屠隆) and the Xi Xiang Sheng Xian Ji (西廂昇仙記) by Huang Cui-Wu (黃粹吾) . Although these works promoted the belief of being reborn in a western paradise, the so-called Pure Land, the main idea of the works still involved the Zen Buddhist concept that “the pure land exists in the mind.” Those works consequently aroused contention among the Pure Land Buddhism followers. As a result, Ye Xianzu (葉憲祖) wrote Shuang Xiu Ji (雙修記) and a monk, Chin Da (智達) , wrote Guei Yuan Jing (歸元鏡) to refute the coexistence of Zen Buddhism and Pure Land Buddhism by focusing on the practice of Pure Land Buddhism in their opera pieces. These works reflected the debates of Zen and Pure Land Buddhism while also initiating new issues for Chinese opera. Based on opera theory, Pure Land Buddhism master Yun Qi-zhu-hong used Chinese opera to explicate the doctrine of Pure Land Buddhism, in an attempt to end the debate between Zen Buddhism practitioners and Pure Land Buddhism practitioners as to whether a western paradise exists, by presenting the concept that no matter whether a western paradise exists or not, performances onstage are not reality; full concentration on chanting Amitabha was the only right path. Furthermore, he created Yan Mo Qu Dian (諺謨曲典) to express his opinion on how practitioners of Buddhism appreciated operas. After that, Chin Da wrote Guei Yuan Jing to preach the doctrine of Pure Land Buddhism. He also wrote Xi Ju Rong Tong (戲劇融通) , Wen Da Yin Yuan (問答因緣) and Ke Wen Jue Yi (客問決疑) to elaborate on the fusion of Chinese opera and Buddhism. Stressing the standpoint of Pure Land Buddhism, he proposed “Dao Zhong Shuo” (道種說, meaning that nature possesses the seed of Buddhahood.) and the harmony of five causes: Buddha dharma, common principles, scripture, music and common convenient methods of practicing Buddhism. This further established the function and significance of preaching Buddhist doctrines through Chinese opera. Chin Da incorporated these theories into his creation, Guei Yuan Jing. In order to maintain religious style, he changed “Chuan Qi” (傳奇, meaning short stories.) into “Shi Lu” (實錄, meaning record.) and “Chu” (齣, meaning chapter.) into “Fen” (分, meaning part.) . In order to maintain the holiness of the operas, the contents were all based on truth and facts, emphasizing the authenticity of the script. Also, to enable ordinary people to chant Amitabha so that they could be reborn in the western paradise, common language and writing styles were stressed. In addition, the performance process was deemed a ritual; performers and audiences were to fast with pious minds and special performance rules were to be observed, such as seated performance or seated singing, also known as the anthem of Pure land Buddhism. With the idea of“preaching with music,” he changed the names of tunes, inserting incantation, anthem and Chinese orchestra music performance into the play. Important stories, doctrines and rituals were combined with music to praise the pure land of western paradise, truly implementing a convenient method to the harmony of the five causes.
期刊論文
1.林智莉(20100100)。遍歷諸境、磨練身心--從屠隆《曇花記》看其宇宙觀。國文學報. 高師大,11,95-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玉女(20100900)。晚明僧俗往來書信中的對話課題--心事.家事.官場事。玄奘佛學研究,14,89-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林智莉(2011)。屠隆信仰與生命觀--以《修文記》為探討。師大學報‧語文與文學類,56(2),95-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.康保成(2003)。明清時期的佛教與地方戲。2002兩岸戲曲學術研討會。宜蘭:傳藝中心。569-615。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林仁昱(1995)。唐代淨土讚歌之形式研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林智莉(1999)。現存元人宗教劇研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃文暘(1967)。曲海總目提要。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.荒木見悟、周賢博(2001)。近世中國佛教的曙光:雲棲祩宏之研究。臺北:慧明文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉宗周(1983)。人譜類記。臺灣:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂天成、吳書蔭(19900800)。曲品校註。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.康保成(2004)。中國古代戲劇形態與佛教。東方出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.雲棲祩宏(1987)。雲棲法彙。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.王陽明(1992)。傳習錄。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.屠隆(1983)。曇花記。臺北:天一出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳震(20090000)。明末清初勸善運動思想研究。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.道宣(1988)。續高僧傳。大藏出版株式會社。  延伸查詢new window
11.廖肇亨(20080000)。中邊.詩禪.夢戲:明末清初佛教文化論述的呈現與開展。臺北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.雲棲袾宏(1975)。雲棲淨土彙語。卍新纂續藏經。東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.祁彪佳(2009)。遠山堂曲品。新邊中國古典戲曲論著集成。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
14.覺浪道盛(1987)。天界覺浪盛禪師語錄。臺北:新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
15.釋智達(1990)。歸元鏡。臺中:臺中蓮社。  延伸查詢new window
16.釋際祥(2006)。淨慈寺志。杭州。  延伸查詢new window
17.無名氏(2009)。傳奇匯考標目。歷代戲曲目錄叢刊。揚州。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃粹吾、湯顯祖(1983)。玉茗堂批評續西廂昇仙記。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.湛然圓澄(1975)。湛然圓澄禪師語錄。卍新纂續藏經。東京。  延伸查詢new window
20.鮑宗肇(1987)。天樂鳴空集。臺北:新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1988)。大智度論。大正新脩大藏經。東京。  延伸查詢new window
22.法照(1988)。淨土五會念佛略法事儀讚。大正新脩大藏經。東京。  延伸查詢new window
23.黃仕忠(2006)。戲曲文獻研究叢稿。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.管東溟(1995)。答涂念東書。《問弁牘》元集。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
25.憨山德清(1975)。雲棲蓮池宏大師塔銘。憨山老人夢遊集。東京。  延伸查詢new window
26.孟良胤(1990)。歸元鏡序。歸元鏡。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
27.嚴而和(1990)。歸元鏡序。歸元鏡。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
28.不知撰者(1990)。淨土傳燈歸元鏡跋。歸元鏡。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
29.金蓮凱(1989)。業海扁舟‧自序。中國古典戲曲序跋彙編。濟南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE